Skip to content

Fentanyl Versus Dexmedetomidine as an Adjuvant to Bupivacaine in Spinal Anesthesia ; Peritoneal Symptomatic Effects

Fentanyl Versus Dexmedetomidine as an Adjuvant to Bupivacaine in Spinal Anaesthesia for Appendectomy Patients; Peritoneal Symptomatic Effects: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06386783
Enrollment
148
Registered
2024-04-26
Start date
2023-07-01
Completion date
2025-02-25
Last updated
2025-02-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dexmedetomidine, Fentanyl

Keywords

Peritoneal symptoms, Spinal ansthesia, Appendectomy

Brief summary

To compare whether 5 μg dexmedetomidine with 25 μg fentanyl added to 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine as adjuvants in spinal anaesthesia in patients undergoing appendectomy could reduce intraoperative peritoneal related symptoms.

Detailed description

Acute appendicitis is among the most common causes of lower abdominal pain leading patients to attend the emergency department and the most common diagnosis made in young patients admitted to the hospital with an acute abdomen . In intracavitary abdominal surgery (e.g. Appendectomy),general anesthesia is conventionally chosen as it provides a higher safety profile with respect to the risk of aspiration, abdominal discomfort, and better exposure secondary to muscle relaxation however, at present it is considered safe to do spinal anesthesia in various abdominal procedures, even where significant muscle relaxation is required in certain complex cases such as peritonitis many patients with complicated conditions were operated under spinal anesthesia, which did not significantly interfere with surgical technique or exposure. Additional advantages of spinal anesthesia include faster recovery, better oral tolerance, and shorter hospital stay compared to general anesthesia. The Covid-19 pandemic currently affects almost every aspect of healthcare. The risk to the operating room team from the contaminated aerosols produced by intubation and positive pressure ventilation may be reduced by performing suitable open operations with neuraxial anaesthesia instead of General anesthesia . Neuroaxial anesthesia is commonly preferred for surgeries of lower abdomen, perineal and lower limb. It is easy to administer and very economical but needs skills. Intrathecal local anesthetics are limited by short duration of action and needs early use of rescue analgesia postoperatively. Adjuvants are added to improve quality and duration, provide better postoperative analgesia and patient comfort. A common problem during abdominal surgeries under spinal anesthesia is peritoneal related symptoms as visceral pain, nausea, vomiting, vagal symptoms like bradycardia and hypotension. Many adjuvants like fentanyl, morphine, ketamine, neostigmine, and clonidine are being used to prolong the analgesic effects of local anaesthetic for many years. These drugs including opioids are usually results in several side effects include itching, decrease respiratory rate, difficulty in urination, postoperative gastrointestinal disturbance which can be overcome by preferring them as adjuvant with other analgesics. Intraoperative peritoneal related symptoms as visceral pain, nausea, vomiting, vagal symptoms like bradycardia and hypotension are a common problem and there are some intrathecal adjuvants can solve these symptoms. Fentanyl is µ receptor agonist 80 times more potent than morphine as an analgesic added to spinal 0.5% heavy bupivacaine improves quality of spinal analgesia, reduces visceral and somatic pain. However, their addition may have side effects like pruritus, respiratory depression, urinary retention, postoperative nausea and vomiting which limits their use. Dexmedetomidine is highly selective α2-agonist, S-enantiomer of veterinary sedative medetomidine. Food and Drug Administration has approved its use for short-term ICU sedation, it is reported to provide sedation that parallels natural sleep, anxiolysis, analgesia, sympatholytic, and anaesthetic-sparing effect with minimal respiratory depression. α2- agonists produce clinical effects. It was reported in a previous study that intraoperative dexmedetomidine can reduce the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV)in patients undergoing thoracic surgery and a dose-response relationship between intraoperative dexmedetomidine and PONV was Observed; and the optimal dose range for antiemetic effects of PONV is 50-100 μg. Previous small Some meta-analyses demonstrated that intraoperative dexmedetomidine significantly lowered post-operative pain scores and opioid consumption, which could lead to a reduced opioid-related adverse events, including PONV. Dexmedetomidine prevents and reduces peritoneal related symptoms Intraoperative, and it can significantly lower the demand for opioids and inhalation anesthesia during and after operation, which could help to reduce opioid-related adverse events, including PONV.

Interventions

DRUGDexmedetomidine Injection [Precedex]

Compare between the efficacy of dexmedetomidine and fentanyl as adjuvants on decreasing the intraoperative peritoneal symptoms such as abdominal discomfort or visceral pain, nausea and vomiting, vagal symptoms like bradycardia and hypotension during appendectomy.

Compare between the efficacy of dexmedetomidine and fentanyl as adjuvants on decreasing the intraoperative peritoneal symptoms such as abdominal discomfort or visceral pain, nausea and vomiting, vagal symptoms like bradycardia and hypotension during appendectomy.

Sponsors

Aswan University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

concealed based on study drugs assigned to each group & to conduct this double -blinded clinical trials, our study drugs will be prepared by the senior anesthesiologist who won't be involved in further observations of the patients and neither patients nor outcome assessor will be aware of which drugs they will receive.

Intervention model description

This randomized double blinded study will be conducted at Aswan university hospitals at patients scheduled for emergency appendectomy

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. ASA physical status class I and II. 2. Age between 18 - 60 years of either sex.

Exclusion criteria

1. ASA grade III and IV. 2. Infection at the site of injection. 3. Coagulopathy or anticoagulation. 4. Congenital anomalies of lower spine. 5. Active disease of CNS. 6. History of allergy to local anesthetics or the adjuvants. 7. Complicated appendicitis.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
intraoperative peritoneal symptoms during appendectomy.Intraoperative period in minutesCompare between the efficacy of dexmedetomidine and fentanyl as adjuvants on decreasing the intraoperative peritoneal symptoms such as abdominal discomfort or visceral pain, nausea and vomiting, vagal symptoms like bradycardia and hypotension during appendectomy.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Assessment of motor block with Modified Bromage scale1,6,12,18 and 24 hoursAssessment of motor block with Modified Bromage scale; Bromage Scale: 1. Bromage 0 - patient can move the hip, knee, and ankle. 2. Bromage 1 - patient is unable to move the hip but can move the knee and ankle. 3. Bromage 2 - patient is unable to move the hip and knee but able to move the ankle. * Onset of Bromage 3 (min), Regression to bromage 0 (min). Bromage Scale: 1. Bromage 0 - patient can move the hip, knee, and ankle. 2. Bromage 1 - patient is unable to move the hip but can move the knee and ankle. 3. Bromage 2 - patient is unable to move the hip and knee but able to move the ankle.
Degree of post-operative analgesia1,6,12,18 and 24 hoursVI. The postoperative pain score will be assessed using visual analogue scale (VAS; scored from 0-10, where 0=no pain and 10=the worst pain imaginable) during the recovery room(T0) and at 1,6,12,18 and 24 hours (T1, T6, T12,T18 and T24) in the postoperative period
Assessment of sensory block by using pin prick methodTime in minutesAssessment of sensory block by using pin prick method; Time from injection to T10(min) and Time from injection to highest Sensory cephalad spread, Resolution to T10 (min)

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

Primary ContactSoudy S Hammad, MD
soudi.salah@aswu.edu.eg+201014761523
Backup ContactAhmed M Hagag, MSc
01141097536

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026