Skip to content

Safety-Enhancing Motor Vehicle Child Safety Seat

Phase II - Safety-Enhancing Motor Vehicle Child Safety Seat

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06384989
Enrollment
50
Registered
2024-04-25
Start date
2024-05-22
Completion date
2024-07-29
Last updated
2025-04-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Motor Vehicle Injury, Safety Issues

Keywords

child restraint system

Brief summary

This study aims to assess the usability of a load leg design for caregivers who must install the child safety seat into a vehicle. The specific aims are to quantify any errors committed by the participants while installing the car seat and to assess participants' opinions on the car seat's load leg design.

Detailed description

A descriptive study will be conducted to determine whether human subjects are able to install the new feature of the prototype car seat correctly. Participants will be presented with the prototype car seat and a set of basic written instructions and labels to guide their installations. The percentage of participants who use the new feature and use it correctly will be reported. Any installation errors on other parts of the child seat (seat belt, lower anchors, top tether) will also be reported.

Interventions

OTHERChild restraint system with load leg feature

The primary objective is to assess the usability of the load leg design for caregivers who must install the child safety seat into a vehicle. The specific aims are to quantify any errors committed by the participants while installing the car seat (especially related to the use of the load leg) and to assess participants' opinions on the car seat's load leg design.

Sponsors

Minnesota HealthSolutions
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Age 18 or older * Be a care provider to a child who is up to 4 years of age * Have installed a child safety seat in the last 2 years * Able to lift and install a child safety seat into a vehicle * English-speaking (because consent forms and explanation will be given in English)

Exclusion criteria

* Not meeting any of the above

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall Correct Use of Load Leg1 study visit, an average of 30 minutesNumber of participants who correctly install the load leg independently, without needing any prompt to use it.
Attempt to Use Load Leg Without Prompting1 study visit, an average of 30 minutesNumber of participants who noticed the load leg on their own, unfolded it from storage, and attempted to use it without being prompted by the researcher.
Correct Load Leg Length1 study visit, an average of 30 minutesNumber of participants who set the load leg to the correct length, including those who needed prompted to use it
Correct Load Leg Angle1 study visit, an average of 30 minutesNumber of participants who set the load leg to the correct angle, including those who needed prompted to use it.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Correct Understanding of Load Leg's Purpose1 study visit, an average of 30 minutesThe number of participants who correctly understood the purpose of the load leg by using words such as security, safety, stability, etc. in their survey responses.
Participants Who Like Having the Load Leg1 study visit, an average of 30 minutesNumber of participants who overall reported that they would like having the load leg feature on a child seat.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Single-group Study
All 50 participants were part of a single group. Their interactions with/installations of the prototype child seat with a load leg were observed.
50
Total50

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSingle-group Study
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
50 Participants
Age, Continuous35.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.2
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
1 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
47 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
7 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
37 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
50 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
36 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
14 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 50
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 50
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 50

Outcome results

Primary

Attempt to Use Load Leg Without Prompting

Number of participants who noticed the load leg on their own, unfolded it from storage, and attempted to use it without being prompted by the researcher.

Time frame: 1 study visit, an average of 30 minutes

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Single-group StudyAttempt to Use Load Leg Without Prompting27 Participants
Primary

Correct Load Leg Angle

Number of participants who set the load leg to the correct angle, including those who needed prompted to use it.

Time frame: 1 study visit, an average of 30 minutes

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Single-group StudyCorrect Load Leg Angle37 Participants
Primary

Correct Load Leg Length

Number of participants who set the load leg to the correct length, including those who needed prompted to use it

Time frame: 1 study visit, an average of 30 minutes

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Single-group StudyCorrect Load Leg Length35 Participants
Primary

Overall Correct Use of Load Leg

Number of participants who correctly install the load leg independently, without needing any prompt to use it.

Time frame: 1 study visit, an average of 30 minutes

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Single-group StudyOverall Correct Use of Load Leg18 Participants
Secondary

Correct Understanding of Load Leg's Purpose

The number of participants who correctly understood the purpose of the load leg by using words such as security, safety, stability, etc. in their survey responses.

Time frame: 1 study visit, an average of 30 minutes

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Single-group StudyCorrect Understanding of Load Leg's Purpose48 Participants
Secondary

Participants Who Like Having the Load Leg

Number of participants who overall reported that they would like having the load leg feature on a child seat.

Time frame: 1 study visit, an average of 30 minutes

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Single-group StudyParticipants Who Like Having the Load Leg28 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026