Skip to content

HIIT on Overweight Middle-aged Adults

Effects of Different Types of High Intensity Intermittent Training Combined With Resveratrol Supplementation on Oxidative Stress, Metabolic Adaption and Fat Loss in Aged and Overweight Groups

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06383442
Acronym
HIIT
Enrollment
36
Registered
2024-04-25
Start date
2021-05-25
Completion date
2023-11-22
Last updated
2024-04-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Overweight or Obesity

Brief summary

36 middle-aged with overweight adults were divided into three groups: 1. L-HIIT group: the long-interval HIIT group (4 × 4 min Exercise/4 min Rest), 2. M-HIIT group: the medium-interval HIIT group (8 × 2 min Exercise/2 min Rest), 3. Control group: no exercise intervention. All groups carried out the training stage for 8 weeks (three sessions per week) and the detraining stage for 4 weeks in order to investigate the effects induced by different HIIT interventions on inflammation, metabolic adaptation, anti-fatigue and exercise performance, and fat loss.

Detailed description

Aging, obesity, have been shown to lead to higher oxidative stress and chronic inflammation. However, high-intensity interval training (HIIT) has anti-inflammatory and anti-obesity benefits. Different training prescriptions may also affect improvements. Therefore, this study will explore the optimal HIIT prescription to improve fat, inflammation, metabolism, and exercise performance in overweight middle-aged and older adults. Thirty-six middle-aged with overweight adults were divided into three groups: 1. L-HIIT group: the long-interval HIIT group (4 × 4 min Exercise/4 min Rest), 2. M-HIIT group: the medium-interval HIIT group (8 × 2 min Exercise/2 min Rest), 3. Control group: no exercise intervention. All groups carried out the training stage for 8 weeks (three sessions per week), then the detraining stage for 4 weeks in order to investigate the effects induced by different HIIT interventions on inflammation, metabolic adaptation, anti-fatigue and exercise performance, and fat loss.

Interventions

OTHERL-HIIT

the long-interval HIIT group (4 × 4 min Exercise/4 min Rest)

OTHERM-HIIT

the medium-interval HIIT group (8 × 2 min Exercise /2 min Rest)

Sponsors

Taipei Medical University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Participants were evenly distributed according to a counterbalanced design and divided into three different groups by the body fat percentage of subjects: 1. L-HIIT group: the long-interval HIIT group (4 × 4 min Exercise/4 min Rest), 2. M-HIIT group: the medium-interval HIIT group (8 × 2 min Exercise /2 min Rest), 3. Control group. Target intensities of each interval bout, exercise and rest (Ex./R.), were 85-90% VO2peak/65-70% VO2peak zones, respectively.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Recruit people who are overweight or obese (BMI between 24-35) who are 20-65 years old and have no exercise habits in a sitting lifestyle.

Exclusion criteria

* If there are any of the following circumstances, they are not allowed to participate in this research and are included in the listing conditions of this case: 1. Have smoking and drinking habits. 2. People who have stroke, type 1 and type 2 diabetes, neuromuscular disease, so that they cannot participate in physical activities. 3. Chronic obstructive lung disease, asthma, interstitial lung disease or alveolar cyst fibrosis. 4. Metabolic diseases include thyroid disease, kidney disease (kidney, bladder stones) or liver disease. 5. Those with arrhythmia, a rhythm regulator, severe cardiovascular disease, peripheral vascular disease or cerebrovascular disease. 6. People with epilepsy and rheumatoid arthritis. 7. Those who have implanted artificial joints in the past six months and have had recent surgery. 8. Migraine, acute thrombosis and hernia. 9. Those who have engaged in strenuous exercise or have muscle aches within 24 hours before the experiment. 10. People who feel unwell due to other reasons during the experiment. 11. People with severe food allergies. 12. Have hospitalization records within three months. 13. People with cognitive impairment. 14. Take any drugs that affect the function of the nervous system.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Aerobic Capacity TestPrimary Outcomes were measured before the intervention (at week 0), after eight weeks of HIIT intervention (at week 8), and after the following four weeks of detraining (at week 12).a graded exercise test (GXT) was performed using a stationary bike ergometer (ergo\_bike Premium 8i, Flugplatzstr, Germany) to assess the subject's VO2peak
Anti-fatigue performancePrimary Outcomes were measured before the intervention (at week 0), after eight weeks of HIIT intervention (at week 8), and after the following four weeks of detraining (at week 12).After a standard warm-up, all subjects were assessed with the classical Wingate (WAnT) on a cycloergometer (Monark 894E, Varberg, Sweden) in a 30 s go all out ultramax test. The seat height was adjusted to the satisfaction of each participant, and toe clips prevented the feet from slipping off the pedals. Before the initial test, the subjects warmed up for 5 min, and the power was approximately 50 W. After the warm-up, two preparation exercises lasting 3 s, during which the actual test load was 3% of their own body weight, were applied to accustom the participant to resistance. The test started, and the resistance was set on the friction belt of the dynamometer. External loading was estimated individually at 5% body weight. The average relative mean power parameters were recorded.
skinfold thicknessPrimary Outcomes were measured before the intervention (at week 0), after eight weeks of HIIT intervention (at week 8), and after the following four weeks of detraining (at week 12).The sum of skinfold thickness at seven sites (triceps, chest, subscapular muscle, upper ilium, abdomen, front thigh, and leg) was measured by using a skinfold caliper (Beta Technology, Santa Cruz, California, USA).
Body composition_body fatPrimary Outcomes were measured before the intervention (at week 0), after eight weeks of HIIT intervention (at week 8), and after the following four weeks of detraining (at week 12).The multi-frequency principle was applied to measure body composition by using a bioelectrical impedance analyzer (BIA) on an InBody 570 device (In-body, Seoul, South Korea). To perform the measurements, after the subjects' palms and soles were removed from the sensors, the subjects stood on the footing electrodes and held the sensing handles with two hands. During the measurements, the subjects kept their arms open and left their bodies at an angle of 30° without speaking or moving. The subjects also fasted for at least 8 h before the test. The body fat were meansure

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
creatine kinase (CK) levelwere measured before the intervention (at week 0), after eight weeks of HIIT intervention (at week 8), and after the following four weeks of detraining (at week 12).At designated time points in the recovery period, blood samples were collected with brachial venous catheters. Assess serum CK(Creatine Kinase, U/L) to monitor physiological fitness. Serum CK (U/L), were assessed for monitoring physiological adaptation. All biochemical indices were assessed using an autoanalyzer (Hitachi 7060, Tokyo, Japan).
C-reactive protein (CRP)were measured before the intervention (at week 0), after eight weeks of HIIT intervention (at week 8), and after the following four weeks of detraining (at week 12).At designated time points in the recovery period, blood samples were collected with brachial venous catheters. Used commercial kit human CRP (Cayman, Mich, USA) and Elisa reader (PerkinElmer, Massachusetts, USA) for analysis
Glucosewere measured before the intervention (at week 0), after eight weeks of HIIT intervention (at week 8), and after the following four weeks of detraining (at week 12).Safety is assessed function of Glucose (70\ 100 mg/dL)
TNF-R2were measured before the intervention (at week 0), after eight weeks of HIIT intervention (at week 8), and after the following four weeks of detraining (at week 12).At designated time points in the recovery period, blood samples were collected with brachial venous catheters. Used commercial kit human TNF-R1 (R & D SYSTEMS, MN USA) and Elisa reader (PerkinElmer, Massachusetts, USA) for analysis
tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-R1were measured before the intervention (at week 0), after eight weeks of HIIT intervention (at week 8), and after the following four weeks of detraining (at week 12).At designated time points in the recovery period, blood samples were collected with brachial venous catheters. Used commercial kit human TNF-R1 (R & D SYSTEMS, MN USA) and Elisa reader (PerkinElmer, Massachusetts, USA) for analysis
Triglycerideswere measured before the intervention (at week 0), after eight weeks of HIIT intervention (at week 8), and after the following four weeks of detraining (at week 12).Safety is assessed function of blood lipid such as Triglycerides (\<150 mg/dL)
low-density lipoprotein (LDL)were measured before the intervention (at week 0), after eight weeks of HIIT intervention (at week 8), and after the following four weeks of detraining (at week 12).Safety is assessed function of blood lipid such as LDL (0\ 140mg/dl)
high-density lipoprotein (HDL)were measured before the intervention (at week 0), after eight weeks of HIIT intervention (at week 8), and after the following four weeks of detraining (at week 12).Safety is assessed function of blood lipid such as LDL (0\ 140mg/dl)

Countries

Taiwan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026