Skip to content

Efficacies of Different Managements in Patients With Trigger Finger

Comparing the Effectiveness of Peritendinous Steroid Injection Under Ultrasound Guidance With Percutaneous A1 Pulley Release in Trigger Finger Treatment

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06382623
Enrollment
30
Registered
2024-04-24
Start date
2022-10-01
Completion date
2023-06-30
Last updated
2024-06-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Trigger Finger

Brief summary

The aim of the study is to compare the effectiveness of peritendinous steroid injection under ultrasound guidance and percutaneous A1 pulley release procedures in terms of disease stage, pain, and severity of locking in patients with trigger finger.

Detailed description

This study was designed as a randomized, controlled, prospective study. Patients who had been experiencing trigger finger symptoms for at least one month and who presented to the Gaziler Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Training and Research Hospital, affiliated with the Health Sciences University Faculty of Medicine Patients were randomly divided into two groups: the peritendinous steroid group (n=15) and the percutaneous pulley release group (n=15). In the first group, under ultrasound guidance, a mixture of 1 ml corticosteroid (2 mg+5 mg/ml betamethasone) and 1 ml local anesthetic (20 ml 2% prilocaine) was injected peritendinously between the A1 pulley and the flexor tendon sheath. In the second group, a percutaneous A1 pulley release procedure was performed under ultrasound guidance using a 20 G needle, followed by peritendinous injection of the same mixture of corticosteroid and local anesthetic. Patients were evaluated four times: before treatment, at 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months after treatment. Modified Quinnel classification, VAS (Visual Analog Scale), and severity of locking scales were used as outcome measures in the study.

Interventions

PROCEDUREThe percutaneous A1 pulley release

Ultrasound-guided percutaneous pulley release is a procedure aimed at loosening the pulley using various cutting instruments or hypodermic needles under ultrasound guidance.

OTHERThe peritendinous Betamethasone group

USG-guided injection of corticosteroid between the A1 pulley and the flexor tendon sheath.

Sponsors

Gaziler Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Education and Research Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
OTHER
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Being over 18 years of age * Having had trigger finger complaints for more than 1 month * Not having received any injections for trigger finger diagnosis within the last 1 month * Signing the informed consent form indicating willingness to participate in the study

Exclusion criteria

* Refusing to participate in the study * Presence of partial or complete tendon rupture in the relevant tendon of the finger to be treated * Presence of wounds and infection in the area where the procedure will be performed * Pregnancy status * History of allergy to the injected medications (local anesthetic, steroid)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Stage of the diseasefirst week, first mount, third monthModified Quinnel classification Stage 1: Normal movement, no pain. * Stage 2: Normal movement, occasional pain. * Stage 3: Irregular movement (catching without crepitus or locking). * Stage 4: Locking present, actively correctable. * Stage 5: Locking present, passively correctable.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain intensityfirst week, first month, third monthThe pain associated with movement in the relevant finger was evaluated using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Patients were explained that 0 represented no pain at all, 10 represented the most severe pain they had ever experienced in their life, and 5 represented moderate pain. They were asked to indicate a number between 0 and 10 that corresponded to the intensity of pain they were feeling.
severity of triggeringfirst week, first month, third monthThe severity of catching in patients was assessed using a Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) ranging from 0 to 10. Patients were explained that 0 represents no catching at all, while 10 represents catching requiring passive correction of the finger. They were asked to mark a number between 0 and 10 corresponding to the severity of catching they experienced.

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026