Skip to content

A CCTA Guided Management Strategy Versus a Standard of Care Strategy in Type 2 NSTEMI

Randomized Control Trial of Outcomes Comparing a Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography (CCTA) Guided Management Strategy Versus a Standard of Care Strategy in Type 2 Non-ST-elevation MI

Status
Withdrawn
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06382402
Enrollment
0
Registered
2024-04-24
Start date
2024-05-01
Completion date
2025-01-01
Last updated
2025-03-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Myocardial Injury

Brief summary

This study design is a prospective randomized control trial to compare outcomes between the utilization of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) vs conservative treatment in type 2 NSTEMI. The targeted population is expectedly heterogeneous and inpatient setting who are admitted and diagnosed with type 2 NSTEMI.

Detailed description

This study design is a prospective randomized control trial to compare outcomes between the utilization of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) vs conservative treatment in type 2 NSTEMI. The targeted population is expectedly heterogeneous and inpatient setting who are admitted and diagnosed with type 2 NSTEMI. Patients are randomized into 2 groups. Group 1 undergoes coronary 64-detector row computed tomography angiography (CCTA) and Group 2 receives conservative management and treatment for underlying conditions. The investigators will evaluate cross-sectional and time-varying clinical, laboratory, and imaging characteristics in association with clinical events. The exclusion criteria are an absence of information for follow-up of clinical events, and patients who have absolute and relative contraindications for CCTA. Absolute contraindications are a patient history of severe or anaphylactic reaction to iodinated contrast, inability to cooperate with scan protocols, hemodynamic instability, decompensated heart failure, acute myocardial infarction, and renal impairment with GFR \< 30. Relative contraindications include pregnancy, inability to tolerate heart rate-slowing medications or nitroglycerin, recent phosphodiesterase inhibitor use, severe aortic stenosis, bronchospastic disease, and patient's weight and height.

Interventions

RADIATIONCCTA scan

• CCTA will be performed per the standard clinical protocol using a Cannon Aquilion ONE scanner with 16 cm z-axis coverage at 0.5 mm resolution, low contrast, and reduced radiation dose requirements.

Sponsors

University of Louisville
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_CONTROL
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Inpatient with type 2 NSTEMI * Aged 18-70 years old * At the University of Louisville and Jewish hospitals

Exclusion criteria

* History of severe or anaphylactic reaction to iodinated contrast * Inability to cooperate with scan protocols * Hemodynamic instability * Decompensated heart failure * Acute myocardial infarction * Renal impairment with GFR \< 30 * Pregnancy * Inability to tolerate heart rate-slowing medications or nitroglycerin * Recent phosphodiesterase inhibitor use * Severe aortic stenosis * Bronchospastic disease * Patient's weight and height

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Unplanned revascularizationanytime within 3 yearsUnplanned revascularization Unit: no unit (yes or no)
MACEanytime within 3 yearsTime to the first major adverse cardiac event (MACE) at 3 years between 2 groups. Unit: no unit (yes/no)
Cardiovascular (CV) mortalityanytime within 3 yearsCardiovascular (CV) mortality Unit: no unit (yes/no)
Nonfatal MI, strokeanytime within 3 yearsNonfatal MI, stroke Unit: no unit (yes or no)
Hospitalization for unstable anginaanytime within 3 yearsHospitalization for unstable angina Unit: no unit (yes or no)
Hospitalization for heart failureanytime within 3 yearsHospitalization for heart failure Unit: no unit (yes or no)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
In-hospital and 90-day costsanytime within 90 daysIn-hospital and 90-day costs Unit: US dollars
Patient quality of life at 90 daysanytime within 90 daysPatient quality of life at 90 days Unit: The numeric rating scales
Diagnostic certainty scoresanytime within 3 yearsDiagnostic certainty scores Unit: The numeric rating scores
Individual components of the primary endpointanytime within 3 yearsIndividual components of the primary endpoint Unit: no unit (yes or no)
All-cause mortalityanytime within 3 yearsAll-cause mortality Unit: no unit (yes or no)

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026