ERCP Biliary Cannulation Success Using ESGE Algorithm

Efficacy of ERCP Using ESGE Algorithm for Biliary Cannulation: a Multicenter Prospective Italian Study

Status

Completed

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Observational

Source

ClinicalTrials.gov

Registry ID

NCT06380543

Acronym

BILINCE

Enrollment

200

Registered

2024-04-24

Start date

2019-12-12

Completion date

2025-03-30

Last updated

2025-05-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Biliary Tract Diseases

Keywords

ERCP, biliary cannulation, post-ERCP complications

Brief summary

Papillary cannulation attempts have been shown to be an independent predictor of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) when they are repeated more than 5 times or for 5 minutes or when the pancreatic duct is opacified or cannulated by using guidewire more than 1 time. In order to reduce complications, the 2016 ESGE guideline recommends a precise sequence of alternative cannulation techniques to the primary guidewire approach before exceeding the stated limits. However, there are no published data about the routinary application of this biliary cannulation algorithm. The investigators hypothesised that the ESGE algorithm predicts an increased cannulation success. Nevertheless, it's unclear if this benefit is also associated with a decreased risk of complications, mainly post-procedural pancreatitis.

Detailed description

Multicenter prospective observational study, which was promoted by SIED (the Italian Society of Digestive Endoscopy) involving Italian Centers that perform ERCP. The study was approved from the Ethics Committee in 2020 with an expected enrollment of 800 patients over three years, with the potential to enroll patients for an extended period of time. Each Center have to enroll a minimum of 15 consecutive patients, depending on the number of enrolling centers. Each patient need to undergo ERCP by using the different cannulation techniques reported in the ESGE algorithm, which are numbered from 1 (easy cannulation) to 9 (difficult cannulation). Digital data entry (RedCap application) are divided in three part: 1. before ERCP (patient demographics, indications for ERCP, the degree of anesthetic risk (ASA 1-3), any prophylactic therapy for pancreatitis, any assumption/interruption of anti-platelet and/or anti-coagulant drugs, the type of sedation); 2. ERCP (cannulation details according to ESGE algorithm, difficulty and duration of the procedure, final diagnosis, expertise of the endoscopist); 3. After ERCP (early and at 30-days complications, defined and graded according to the Cotton classification).

Interventions

None listed

Study design

Observational model

COHORT

Time perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

ALL

Age

18 Years to No maximum

Healthy volunteers

Inclusion criteria

* patients \> 18 years of age; * native papilla; * signed Informed Consent;

Exclusion criteria

* previous biliary sphincterotomy; * post-surgical ERCP; * ampulloma or papilla involved by a tumor; * pancreatic endotherapy; * patients unable to give consent for the procedure;

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame	Description
Success of ERCP biliary cannulation rate	At the end of the procedure.	Success obtained with the different cannulation techniques according with the ESGE algorithm

Secondary

Measure	Time frame	Description
ERCP complication rates	At 0-72 hours, and at 30-days after the procedure.	pancreatitis, bleeding, perforation, or cholangitis according with the ESGE algorithm

Countries

Italy

Outcome results