Skip to content

A Smart Self-Management Support Programme (3S) to Improve Quality of Life in Lung Cancer Patients

A Smart Self-Management Support Programme (3S) to Improve Quality of Life in Patients With Lung Cancer - A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial With Mixed-method Evaluation

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06377124
Enrollment
320
Registered
2024-04-22
Start date
2024-04-22
Completion date
2026-06-30
Last updated
2025-03-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Lung Cancer

Keywords

Lung Cancer

Brief summary

Lung cancers patients often experience multiple symptoms (e.g. fatigue, dyspnea, distress, depression, sleep disturbance). The current study attempts to explore the efficacy of the Smart Self-Management Support Programme (3S) in improving quality of life of patients using self-management support programme with mobile devices.

Detailed description

Lung cancer (LC) is the most and second most common cancer globally and locally respectively. LC patients often experience multiple symptoms (e.g. fatigue, dyspnea, distress, depression, sleep disturbance). The symptom burden is greater than other cancers and adversely affects quality of life. Care of LC patients has shifted from a purely disease-centered approach on survival-related outcomes to person-centered approach with emphasis on quality-of-life outcomes. Self-management support programme (SMS) is perceived to supplement regular medical treatments and follow-up and cost-effective in cancer care. Besides, digital technologies have been used in patient empowerment digital platform to improve self-management of cancer patients. Using the self-management support programme and mobile devices, the Smart Self-Management Support Programme (3S) attempts to improve quality of life of patients. The current study aims to examine the efficacy of 3S on improving quality of life and patient activation (knowledge, skills, and confidence for self-management) in the 3S intervention group, compared to the general health (GH) control group. It also aims to examine the changes in the burden of care, anxiety and depression symptoms, and quality of life of the family caregivers (FCGs) of the patients in the 3S group, compared to FCGs of the patients in the GH group. We also conduct process valuations to assess the essential features of context, implementation, and impact mechanism, and cost-effectiveness evaluation to examine health care resource utilisation and cost-effectiveness analysis. 160 patients with lung cancer will be recruited, and 160 family caregivers will also be invited to join the study.

Interventions

BEHAVIORAL3S intervention

The 3S intervention includes information and support related to self-management of lung cancer, including 1. an individual 3S session at baseline, 2. 24-week messaging, telephone coaching and hotline services.

BEHAVIORALGH information

The GH information includes information related to general health, including 1. an individual GH session at baseline, 2. 24-week messaging, telephone coaching and hotline services.

Sponsors

Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong
CollaboratorOTHER
The Queen Elizabeth Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
United Christian Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
The University of Hong Kong
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

The outcome assessor was not aware of which groups the patients belonged to.

Intervention model description

The 3S intervention includes an individual session, messaging and phone contact related to lung cancer self-management, and hotline services. The general health information includes an individual session, messaging and phone contact related to general health information, and hotline services.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 100 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Patients: Inclusion Criteria: * Aged 18 years or above * Diagnosis of advanced-stage (stage III or stage IV) non-small cell lung cancer * Ambulatory and capable of all self-care activities (ECOG ≤2) * Either undergoing or has finished oncology therapy * Mentally, cognitively and physically fit to join as determined by the doctor in charge and responsible clinical investigators * Can speak and read Chinese * Willing to complete the patient-reported outcome questionnaire * Has a smartphone with WhatsApp or WeChat

Exclusion criteria

* Preparing for lung operation * Skeletal fragility * Serious active infection * Inability to walk * Previously untreated symptomatic brain metastases * Severe respiratory insufficiency * Uncontrolled pain * Diagnosed psychiatric illness with or without medication Family Caregivers: Inclusion criteria: * Aged 18 years or above * Family caregivers of recruited patients

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in health-related quality of lifeBaseline and 8-week follow-upMeasured by a 30-item European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer and Lung Module. All scale scores are linearly converted to a range from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate better functioning and quality of life.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in patient activationBaseline, 8-week and 24-week follow-upMeasured by a 13-item Patient Activation Measure with a 5-point Likert response scale from 0 to 4. Raw scores are transformed to a scale of 0-100 with higher scores indicating a higher activation in self-management.
Change in general self-efficacyBaseline, 8-week and 24-week follow-upMeasured by a 10-item General Self-efficacy Scale with a 4-point Likert response scale from 1 to 4, the total score ranges between 10 and 40, with a higher score indicating more self-efficacy.
Change in acceptance of illnessBaseline, 8-week and 24-week follow-upThis is measured by a 12-item Peaceful Acceptance subscale of the Peace, Equanimity, and Acceptance in the Cancer Experience questionnaire. Each item ranges between 1 and 4. A higher score indicates a greater extent of acceptance of the cancer diagnosis.
Change in physical activity levelBaseline, 8-week and 24-week follow-upMeasured the days and duration of physical activity level (light, moderate and vigorous) and sitting time in the past 7 days by the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (short version) with 4 questions.
Change in diet habitBaseline, 8-week and 24-week follow-upMeasured by 10-item dietary intake and practice outcome based questions
Change in smoking and drinking habitsBaseline, 8-week and 24-week follow-upMeasured by self-reported drinking and smoking frequency
Change in health statusBaseline, 8-week and 24-week follow-upMeasured by 5-item EuroQol-5D Questionnaire. Each item is a different dimension that ranges from level 1-5, a higher level indicates a more severe level of perceived problem of that dimension.
Change in anxiety symptoms of patientsBaseline, 8-week and 24-week follow-upMeasured by a 7-item Generalised Anxiety Disorder Assessment. Each item asks the individual to rate the severity of his or her symptoms with a 4-point Likert scale. The total score ranges from 0 to 21. The higher scores the greater severity of anxiety symptoms.
Change in depression symptoms of patientsBaseline, 8-week and 24-week follow-upMeasured by a 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire. Each item asks the individual to rate the severity of his or her symptoms with a 4-point Likert scale. The total score ranges from 0 to 27. The higher scores the greater severity of depression symptoms.
Change in social and family supportBaseline, 8-week and 24-week follow-upMeasured by 8-item Family and Friend Subscales of Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support with a 7-point Likert scale. Each scale ranges from 4 to 28. A higher score equates with higher social support.
Change in adherence to agreed preset health-related goalsBaseline, 8-week and 24-week follow-upMeasured by web-based platform (WhatsApp) in which patients will be asked to self-report whether they have completed their previously agreed health-related or general hygiene goals with nurses on a weekly basis. Adherence will be assessed by the frequency of self-reported goal completion by patients.
Change in symptom severityBaseline, 8-week and 24-week follow-upMeasured by 13-item European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer on symptom severity with a 4-point Likert scale. A higher score indicates a higher level of symptom severity.
Change in health-related quality of lifeBaseline and 24-week follow-upMeasured by a 30-item European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer and Lung Module. All scale scores are linearly converted to a range from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate better functioning and quality of life.
Change in lower limb strengthBaseline, 8-week and 24-week follow-upMeasured by a 30-second chair stand test. The number of participant stood up repeatedly from a chair for 30 seconds.
Change in hand grip strengthBaseline, 8-week and 24-week follow-upMeasured by a dynamometer
Change in flexibilityBaseline, 8-week and 24-week follow-upMeasured by a Chair sit and reach test.
Change in balanceBaseline, 8-week and 24-week follow-upMeasured by a single-leg stance test
Change in body compositionBaseline, 8-week and 24-week follow-upCalculated by ratio of body weight and body height
Change in objective physical activity levelBaseline, 8-week and 24-week follow-upMeasured by a 7-day waist-worn accelerometer
Change in objective sleep qualityBaseline, 8-week and 24-week follow-upMeasured by a sleep-wake monitor (Motionlogger MicroWatch)
Change in burden of family caregivers (For FCGs)Baseline, 8-week and 24-week follow-upMeasured by the 24-item Caregiver Burden Inventory with a 5-point Likert scale from 0 to 4. Total score ranges from 0 to 96 with higher score indicating a higher caregiver burden.
Change in quality of life of family caregivers (For FCGs)Baseline, 8-week and 24-week follow-upMeasured by the 35-item Caregiver Quality of Life Index-Cancer scale with a 5-point Likert scale from 0 to 4. Total score ranges from 0 to 140. Higher score indicates a higher quality of life.
Change in anxiety symptoms of family caregivers (For FCGs)Baseline, 8-week and 24-week follow-upMeasured by a 7-item Generalised Anxiety Disorder Assessment. Each item asks the individual to rate the severity of his or her symptoms with a 4-point Likert scale. The total score ranges from 0 to 21. The higher scores the greater severity of anxiety symptoms.
Change in depression symptoms of family caregivers (For FCGs)Baseline, 8-week and 24-week follow-upMeasured by a 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire. Each item asks the individual to rate the severity of his or her symptoms with a 4-point Likert scale. The total score ranges from 0 to 27. The higher scores the greater severity of depression symptoms.
Change in functional exercise capacityBaseline, 8-week and 24-week follow-upMeasured by a 6-minute walk test. The distance of participant walked with the instructions to walk back and forth at their own pace to a designated spot for 6 minutes.

Countries

Hong Kong

Contacts

Primary ContactAgnes Yuen Kwan Lai, PhD
ayklai@hkmu.edu.hk852 3970 2917

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026