Skip to content

A RCT to Compare the Effectiveness of Nebulized Anticholinergics for Cough Suppression During Flexible Bronchoscopy

A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Trial to Compare the Effectiveness of Nebulized Anticholinergics for Cough Suppression During Flexible Bronchoscopy

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06376942
Acronym
NAFCOF
Enrollment
1050
Registered
2024-04-22
Start date
2024-04-24
Completion date
2025-06-15
Last updated
2024-04-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Subjects Undergoing Flexible Bronchoscopy

Brief summary

No study has examined the role of inhaled glycopyrrolate on mucus secretion. We hypothesize that nebulized glycopyrrolate will improve bronchoscopy procedure by effectively suppressing airway mucus secretion, thereby decreasing cough, and thus improving patient comfort during bronchoscopy. In this study, we aim to compare the efficacy of nebulized glycopyrrolate versus nebulized ipratropium in suppression of cough during flexible bronchoscopy.

Detailed description

Bronchoscopy is a minimally invasive endoscopic technique for direct visualization of airways, with diagnostic and therapeutic intent. In 1897, Killian laid the foundation of bronchoscopy by extracting an animal bone from the right main bronchus of a farmer using rigid esophagoscope. In 1966, Shigeto Ikeda developed a prototype of flexible bronchoscope. Since its inception, flexible bronchoscope has undergone advancements in design and technology. The technological advancements in the recent decades have improved diagnostic yield and safety, with low morbidity and mortality. Unfortunately, the occurrence of cough during flexible bronchoscopy makes the procedure difficult and increases procedure time with patient discomfort. Owing to the lack of clinical benefits and possible hemodynamic changes, the British Thoracic Society and Joint Indian Chest Society recommend not to use anticholinergic premedication via the parenteral route for preventing cough before bronchoscopy. bronchoscopy. A few studies have evaluated inhaled anticholinergic premedication. Inoue et al. (in 1994) studied the effects of inhaled ipratropium bromide on bronchoconstriction in 29 subjects underwent for diagnostic bronchoscopy. They concluded that ipratropium protects against the deleterious effects resulting from topical lidocaine anesthesia during bronchoscopy. Wang et al. evaluated the efficacy of ipratropium bromide in 250 patients in a placebo-controlled trial. They reported that nebulized ipratropium bromide could reduce airway secretions and patient discomfort. To our knowledge, no study has examined the role of inhaled glycopyrrolate on mucus secretion. We hypothesize that nebulized glycopyrrolate will improve bronchoscopy procedure by effectively suppressing airway mucus secretion, thereby decreasing cough, and thus improving patient comfort during bronchoscopy. In this study, we aim to compare the efficacy of nebulized glycopyrrolate versus nebulized ipratropium in suppression of cough during flexible bronchoscopy.

Interventions

Nebulized glycopyrronium 50 mcg

Nebulized iptratropium 500 mcg

OTHERSaline

0.9% saline 2 ml

Sponsors

Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Consecutive patients with indication for flexible bronchoscopy will be enrolled in the study if they meet all the following criteria: * age ≥18 years * hemodynamically stable * willing to provide a written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Patients with any of the following will be excluded: * intubated or tracheostomized patients * patients with airway stent in situ * patients with a history of glaucoma * baseline oxygen saturation \<90% * patients with hemodynamic instability (SBP \<90 mm Hg) * patients undergoing sedation for bronchoscopy * failure to provide informed consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Cough countIntra-procedureObjectively measured using condenser microphone and voice recording application though a smartphone

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Operator-estimated airway secretionIntra-procedureRecorded as: almost none, needing saline to wash out, and excessive, making it difficult to visualize the airways and requires 5 ml aliquots of saline
Operator-rated secretions on a visual analogue scale (VAS)Immedidate post-procedure100 mm VAS anchored as no secretion at one and maximal secretions at the other
Operator-rated cough intensity on a visual analogue scale (VAS)Immedidate post-procedure100 mm VAS anchored as no cough at one and maximal cough at the other
Patient-rated comfort on a visual analogue scale (VAS)Immedidate post-procedure100 mm VAS anchored as maximal comfort at one and maximal discomfort at the other
Adverse reactions1-hour post-procedureArrhythmia, glaucoma, nausea, headache

Countries

India

Contacts

Primary ContactRitesh Agarwal
agarwal.ritesh@outlook.in7087007625
Backup ContactInderpaul Sehgal
inderpgi@outlook.com7087007625

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026