Skip to content

The Fragility of Metaphors (FraMe): Learning, Loosing, and How to Train Them

The Fragility of Metaphors (FraMe): Learning, Loosing, and How to Train Them

Status
Enrolling by invitation
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06375902
Acronym
FRAME
Enrollment
64
Registered
2024-04-19
Start date
2024-07-12
Completion date
2025-10-31
Last updated
2025-01-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Schizophrenia; Psychosis

Keywords

language, pragmatics, rehabilitation, electrophysiology

Brief summary

Tracking down the difficulties in metaphor comprehension experienced by individuals with schizophrenia across different metaphor types and exploring the neurological correlates via EEG recording technique

Detailed description

The investigators will address the following objectives: * Primary Objective: Tracking down the difficulties in metaphor comprehension experienced by individuals with schizophrenia across different metaphor types and exploring the neurological correlates via EEG recording technique * Secondary Objectives: 1) Evaluate the interactions between performances in metaphor comprehension and individual differences in psychopathology, cognition, ToM and functioning; 2) Test if the altered neurophysiological patterns associated to the fragility of metaphor comprehension in schizophrenia can be restored through a rehabilitative training The investigators will enroll 32 schizophrenic patients and 32 healthy subjects as control sample. Participants will undergo an initial visit with a specialist psychiatrist who will verify that their conditions meet the criteria required by the study. Then, subjects will be tested for metaphor comprehension, as well as for the other variables included in the study, and the electrical brain activity will be registered through a 128 channel EEG. In the check-up visits (i.e., after the training) the following data will be collected: * Scores relating to cognitive, pragmatic (understanding of metaphors), theory of mind and global functioning performance scores * EEG recordings related to the process of understanding metaphors * Scores on scales that evaluate psychopathological severity

Interventions

BEHAVIORALPragmaCom

Cognitive behavioral intervention targeting the ability to understand metaphors

Sponsors

IRCCS San Raffaele
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_CONTROL
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

For patients: * Age between 18 and 65 years * Diagnosis of Schizophrenia according to DSM V criteria * Ability to provide informed consent For healthy controls: * Age between 18 and 65 years * Ability to provide informed consent * Absence of psychiatric pathologies * Ability to speak Italian

Exclusion criteria

For patients: * Intellectual disability * Neurological disorder For healthy controls: * Presence of psychiatric pathologies * Difficulties in speaking Italian

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Tracking down the difficulties in metaphor comprehension via a behavioural taskthrough study completion, an average of 2 yearsTracking down the difficulties in metaphor comprehension experienced by individuals with schizophrenia compared to healthy controls across different metaphor types through the Physical and mental metaphor task (PMM) (range values 0-28, higher scores mean a better outcome).
Tracking down the difficulties in metaphor comprehension via task during electrophysiological recordingthrough study completion, an average of 2 yearsExploring the difference in the neurological correlates (via electrophysiological recording technique) between patients and controls. Electrophysiological indexes that will be evaluated are event-related potential after the stimulus presentation.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Evaluation of Theory of Mindthrough study completion, an average of 2 yearsEvaluate Theory of Mind with the Picture sequencing task (PST) (range score 0-56, higher scores mean a better outcome).
Evaluation of psychopathologythrough study completion, an average of 2 yearsEvaluate psychopathology with the Positive and Negative Syndrome scale (PANSS) (range values 30-210, higher scores mean a worse outcome).
Evaluate the efficacy of a rehabilitative training in restoring metaphor comprehension abilitythrough study completion, an average of 2 yearsTest te improvement of metaphor comprehension, evaluated with the Physical and mental metaphor task (PMM) (range values 0-28, higher scores mean a better outcome).
Evaluation of functioningthrough study completion, an average of 2 yearsEvaluate functioning, with the Quality of life scale (QLS) (range score 0-126, higher scores mean a better outcome).
Evaluation of cognitionthrough study completion, an average of 2 yearsEvaluate cognition in schizophrenia with the Brief assessement of cognition in schizophrenia (BACS) (range total score 0-1, higher scores mean a better outcome).

Countries

Italy

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026