Tooth Diseases
Conditions
Brief summary
The clinical performance of an an alkasite-based restorative material and two different resin composites will be evaluated and compared in non-carious cervical lesions. After recruiting participants with at least three non-carious cervical lesions, all restorations will be placed by a single clinician. Lesions will be divided in three groups: an alkasite-based restorative material (Cention N, Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein (CN)), hybrid resin composite (Gradia Direct Anterior, GC, Tokyo, Japan (GD)) and a highly filled flowable resin composite ((G-aenial Universal Flo, GC, Tokyo, Japan (GF)). All restorative procedures will be conducted according to manufacturers' instructions. Restorations will be scored using FDI criteria. Descriptive statistics will be performed using chi-square tests.
Interventions
DEVICEan alkasite-based restorative material
Cention N
DEVICEhybrid resin composite
Gradia Direct Anterior
DEVICEa highly filled flowable resin composite
G-aenial Universal Flo
Sponsors
Hacettepe University
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
* Age range will be 18 to 65. * They will be required to have at least three NCCLs needed restoration in different teeth. * All the NCCLs selected will be in similar sizes.
Exclusion criteria
* Patients with severe periodontal disease * Patients with rampant, uncontrolled caries * Patients with xerostomia * Patients with serious medical problems preventing them from attending review visits * Patients with poor gingival health * Patients with heavy bruxism * Patients with removable partial dentures * Patients undergoing bleaching treatment or orthodontic treatment
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Clinical performances of different restorative systems according to FDI criteria (Esthetic properties) | two years | Two year results according to FDI criteria. (Esthetic properties) The evaluations will be carried out using FDI criteria. Esthetic properties will be examined. Five scores will be given for each restoration: (1) Clinically excellent / very good, (2) Clinically good, (3) Clinically sufficient/satisfactory, (4) Clinically unsatisfactory, (5) Clinically poor.The data obtained for groups will be compared at each visit. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Clinical performances of different restorative systems according to FDI criteria (Functional properties) | two years | Two year results according to FDI criteria. (Functional properties) The evaluations will be carried out using FDI criteria. Functional properties will be examined.Five scores will be given for each restoration: (1) Clinically excellent / very good, (2) Clinically good, (3) Clinically sufficient/satisfactory, (4) Clinically unsatisfactory, (5) Clinically poor.The data obtained for groups will be compared at each visit. |
Other
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Clinical performances of different restorative systems according to FDI criteria (Biological properties) | two years | Two year results according to FDI criteria. (Biological properties) The evaluations will be carried out using FDI criteria. Biological properties will be examined.Five scores will be given for each restoration: (1) Clinically excellent / very good, (2) Clinically good, (3) Clinically sufficient/satisfactory, (4) Clinically unsatisfactory, (5) Clinically poor.The data obtained for groups will be compared at each visit. |
Countries
Turkey (Türkiye)
Outcome results
None listed