Skip to content

NavIIcusp: Bicuspid Aortic Valve Stenosis With Navitor Platform International Experience

NavIIcusp: Bicuspid Aortic Valve Stenosis With Navitor Platform International Experience

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06375590
Enrollment
150
Registered
2024-04-19
Start date
2024-05-01
Completion date
2026-05-01
Last updated
2024-04-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Bicuspid Aortic Valve

Keywords

Bicuspid aortic valve, TAVI, Navitor

Brief summary

The aim of this prospective registry is to evaluate the clinical impact of the new Navitor prosthesis (Abbott, Minneapolis, MN, USA) in BAV and evaluate both the main sizing methods (the classical annular or the supra-annular with ICD measurement at 4 mm above the virtual basal ring).

Interventions

DEVICETranscatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

Transcatheter treatment of bicuspid stenosis with the Navitor platform

Sponsors

Abbott
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Didier TCHETCHE
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Age ≥ 18 years. 2. NYHA ≥ 2 and/or syncope and/or angina. 3. Symptomatic severe calcified aortic stenosis with AVA \< 1 cm2 AND peak velocity \> 4 m/s or mean gradient \> 40 mmHg or DVI \< 0.25'. 4. Patient judged by the Heart Team as indicated for TAVI. 5. Anatomical suitability for transfemoral-TAVI with Navitor, based on MSCT assessment. 6. Estimated life-expectancy \> 1 year.

Exclusion criteria

1. Age \< 18 years 2. Asymptomatic patients 3. Estimated life expectancy \< 1 year 4. Pure aortic regurgitation. 5. LVEF \< 20% 6. No baseline MSCT evaluation. 7. Unsuitable aortic root anatomy for Navitor. 8. Unsuitable peripheral vasculature for transfemoral Navitor. 9. Type 2 bicuspid aortic valve 10. Excessive leaflet calcifications 11. Moderate or severe raphe calcifications 12. Severe LVOT calcifications 13. Perimeter-derived annular dimension exceeding IFU recommendation 14. Dilated ascending aorta \>45 mm

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
30-day device success (Rate)30-dayas indicated in the VARC-3 criteria

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
1 year at least moderate bioprosthetic valve deterioration1-yeardefined as increase in mean transvalvular gradient ≥10 mmHg resulting in mean gradient ≥20 mmHg with concomitant decrease in EOA ≥0.3 cm2 or ≥25% and/or decrease in Doppler velocity index ≥0.1 or ≥20% compared with echocardiographic assessment performed 1-3 months post-procedure, OR new occurrence or increase of ≥1 grade of intra-prosthetic AR resulting in ≥ moderate AR
1 year severe patient-prosthesis mismatch1-yeardefined as EOAi \< 0.65 cm2/m2
30 days and 1 year all-cause and cardiovascular mortality1-year
30 days and 1 year stroke1-year

Countries

France

Contacts

Primary ContactDidier Tchétché, MD
d.tchetche@clinique-pasteur.com+33562211699

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026