Skip to content

Surgical Outcomes of Conventional Hysterectomy or Manipulator-assisted Abdominal Hysterectomy

The Comparison of Surgical Outcomes to Conventional Hysterectomy and Manipulator-assisted Abdominal Hysterectomy

Status
Enrolling by invitation
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06374940
Enrollment
140
Registered
2024-04-19
Start date
2024-04-17
Completion date
2024-05-18
Last updated
2024-04-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Gynecologic Disease

Keywords

Hysterectomy, Manipulator-assisted abdominal hysterectomy

Brief summary

Objective: The comparison of surgical outcomes conventional hysterectomy and manipulator-assisted hysterectomy Study design: Prospective randomized controlled trial. Allocation to either group occurred via computer-generated random numbers. Sequentially numbered, opaque envelopes were prepared according to randomization. The patients were unaware of whether they would undergo a conventional hysterectomy or manipulator-assisted abdominal hysterectomy for their surgical procedure. The research coordinator unveiled group assignments upon individual patient recruitment by opening the corresponding envelope. Study population: Inclusion criteria were patients aged 40-70 years who underwent hysterectomy for benign gynecological indications. Primary outcomes: (1) Operation Time. Secondary outcomes: (1) Postoperative early pain (Visual Analog Score (VAS) at 6th and 24th hours of the surgery) (2) intraoperative complications, (3) postoperative complications

Interventions

PROCEDUREManipulator-assisted Abdominal Hysterectomy

Manipulator-assisted Abdominal Hysterectomy

Sponsors

Dr. Lutfi Kirdar Kartal Training and Research Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
40 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Inclusion criteria were patients aged 40-70 years who underwent hysterectomy for benign gynecological indications

Exclusion criteria

*

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Duration of the surgical procedureintraoperativeThe surgical operative time was defined as the time from incision to completion of wound closure, also known as 'cut-to-close' time. In the manipulator-assisted abdominal hysterectomy group, the time of uterine manipulator placement was added to the operation time

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Postoperative pain at 6th hoursAt the 6th hours after the surgical procedurePostoperative pain scores will be measured with using Visual Analogue Score (VAS) as self-reported by the participating women. The VAS scores range from 0= no pain to 10= worst imaginable pain.
Postoperative pain at 24th hoursAt the 24th hours after the surgical procedurepostoperative pain scores will be measured with using Visual Analogue Score (VAS) as self-reported by the participating women. The VAS scores range from 0= no pain to 10= worst imaginable pain.
intraoperative complicationsIntraoperativeAny minor and major (e.g., bowel injury, bleeding\>300cc, major vessel injury) complications that occur during the surgery
Postoperative complicationsPostoperative, in the first month of the surgeryAny minor and major complications (e.g., bowel injury, haematoma, infection, dyspareunia, vaginal pain, sexual discomfort) that occur in the first month of the surgery.

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026