Skip to content

C3 Laminectomy With Cervical Laminoplasty

Randomized Controlled Trial: Comparison of Radiological and Axial Pain Outcome Between C3-6 Laminoplasty and C3 Laminectomy With Cervical Laminoplasty

Status
Withdrawn
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06374680
Enrollment
0
Registered
2024-04-19
Start date
2017-03-20
Completion date
2021-12-31
Last updated
2024-04-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Neck Pain

Brief summary

1. Background In cervical stenosis, cervical laminoplasty from the third to sixth cervical vertebrae is widely used. However, the muscles attached to the C2, which play an important role in the movement of our neck, are frequently damaged during the C3 laminoplasty. In contrast, cervical spine surgery through the removal of the C3 is thought to give less damage to the muscles attached to the C2. 2. Purpose The aim of this study was to compare the prospective randomized comparison of these two surgical methods. 3. Hypothesis There is no difference in the cervical length and overall cervical angle between 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months postoperatively between C3 laminectomy with C4-6 laminoplasty and C3-6 laminoplasty.

Detailed description

Surgery is performed under general anesthesia as before, followed by posterior cervical incision. In one group, the cervical spine of the C3 is removed using a drill and punch and C4-6 laminoplasty will be performed. In the other group, C3-6 laminoiplasty will be performed. Postoperative suturing and subject management are the same as existing patient care policies. Follow-up is performed at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and 1 year after surgery at the outpatient clinic and x-ray is taken at each outpatient follow-up. The degree of the neck pain is measured using NDI and VAS for each outpatient f/u.

Interventions

PROCEDURElaminectomy at C3 level

laminectomy at C3 level

Sponsors

Seoul National University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* cervical stenosis

Exclusion criteria

* metastatic tumor * fracture * previous cervical spine surgery (posterior approach)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
neck pain1 yearNumerical rating pain score on neck, 0\ 10, 0 is no pain, 10 is maximum pain

Countries

South Korea

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026