Skip to content

TFL vs MOSES Holmium Laser in the En-bloc Resection of Bladder Tumors

Thulium Fiber Laser (TFL) Versus MOSES Holmium Laser in the En-bloc Resection of Bladder Tumors: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Study

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06373419
Enrollment
100
Registered
2024-04-18
Start date
2023-10-16
Completion date
2026-10-31
Last updated
2024-04-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Urolithiasis of Bladder

Brief summary

The goal of this randomized clinical trial is to determine if there is difference in pathological and clinical outcomes between MOSES and TFL in the transurethral laser enucleation of bladder tumors. The main question it aims to answer is: Is there a difference in pathological and clinical outcomes between MOSES Holmium and Thulium Fiber Laser (TFL) in the transurethral laser enucleation of bladder tumors? Participants will randomized to either TFL of MOSES arm for their bladder resection procedure.

Detailed description

An estimated 12,500 Canadians are diagnosed with bladder cancer each year. Diagnosis and treatment involve transurethral (through the urethra) resection of tumor or tissue called the TURBT procedure. This procedure yields excellent results and minimal morbidity and mortality but has a high recurrence rate, difficulties in the pathologic interpretation of the specimen (due to cautery effect), and procedure-related complications (excessive bleeding, bladder perforation, bowel injury, and inadvertent extensive injury to urethra) that may delay treatments such as chemotherapy which would further impact oncologic outcomes. With the advancement of technology, new methods of transurethral tumor removal have emerged, such as the use of laser energy. Using laser energy, the tumour is resected in one piece, whereas the TURBT approach requires breaking the tumor into pieces. This allows for better pathology analysis that can determine treatment pathways for the patient, as well as reduces the risk of complications. The standard lasers used have been the MOSES Holmium laser and the Thulium Fiber Laser (TFL).

Interventions

DEVICETFL

Participant undergoing bladder tumour resection that has been randomized to this arm.

Participant undergoing bladder tumour resection that has been randomized to this arm.

Sponsors

Thunder Bay Regional Health Research Institute
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Over 18 years of age at the time of enrollment. 2. Patients presented with visual criteria suggesting bladder tumor by outpatient cystoscopy will be legible for inclusion.

Exclusion criteria

1. Tumors deemed not eligible for laser resection as determined by the Urologist e.g. obvious muscle-invasive or metastatic at presentation 2. Synchronous either urethral tumors or upper urinary tract tumor 3. History of Carcinoma in situ 4. Contracted bladder

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Presence of muscularis propria1 day post-procesurePresence of muscularis propria (bladder muscle cells) in the pathology sample of the bladder tumour
Incidence of inconclusive pathology1 day post-procedureIncidence of inconclusive pathology due to specimen artifact

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Tumor-free rate (TFR)6 to 12 weeks post-procedureAs per the follow-up cystoscopy, TFR is defined as the absence of any residual tumor detectable by cystoscopy.
Total operative timeIntraoperativeIn minutes measured from anesthesia induction until placement of the urethral catheter
Total procedural timeIntraoperativeIn minutes, measured from the time the cystoscope sheath is inserted into the participant to the time the cystoscope has been removed
Number of recurrences12 weeks post-procedureDefined as any tumor detection by follow-up cystoscopy after the initial resection
Rate of complications4 weeks post-procedurePercentage of participants with post-operative complications
Lasing timeIntraoperativeIn minutes, defined as the time the laser was in use, not including pedal pauses
Total energy usedIntraoperativeMeasured in kilojoules
Frequency and severity of peri-operative complicationsIntraoperativeReported according to Clavien-Dindo
Total blood loss6 hours post-procedureDefined as a drop in hemoglobin level from pre-op
Number of inconclusive pathology1 day post-procedureNumber of inconclusive pathology due to thermal effect artifact.

Countries

Canada

Contacts

Primary ContactRabail Siddiqui
rabail.siddiqui@tbh.net(807) 684-6000
Backup ContactShalyn Littlefield
shalyn.littlefield@tbh.net(807) 684-6000

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026