Skip to content

DEEP Substrate Mapping Versus Activation Mapping for VT

Substrate-based DEEP Mapping Versus Activation Mapping: A Prospective Randomized Multicenter Study

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06371729
Enrollment
222
Registered
2024-04-17
Start date
2024-06-13
Completion date
2027-06-01
Last updated
2026-03-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Ventricular Tachycardia

Keywords

DEEP substrate mapping, Activation mapping

Brief summary

Substrate-based DEEP mapping and activation mapping are two of the main techniques used for guiding ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation. There is no data comparing directly the extent of applicability, procedural results, and the long-term outcomes between the two mapping strategies.This randomized clinical trial aims to test whether activation mapping is superior to DEEP mapping to reduce ventricular tachycardia recurrence. The primary endpoint of the study is to compare recurrence-free survival rate of ventricular tachycardia at 12 months and procedural feasibility of substrate-based DEEP mapping versus activation mapping for VT ablation.

Interventions

PROCEDUREDEEP mapping

The Substrate-based DEEP Mapping aims to identify the arrhythmogenic substrate of VT in sinus rhythm (SR). A standardized VT mapping and ablation procedure in SR has been proven effective in reducing VT recurrences in a multicenter setting by targeting late potential (LP) abolition. Regions with LPs and LAVAs that displayed decremental behavior evoked during right ventricular (RV) pacing with extra stimuli (decrement-evoked potential; DEEP), colocalized with the regions of the initiation and diastolic pathway of the VT more accurately than those areas displaying non decremental LPs. Device use for mapping and ablation procedure: FlexAbility/Tactiflex/TactiCath Ablation Catheter Sensor Enabled (Abbott, MN), high-density grid mapping catheter (GMC; Advisor HD Grid Mapping Catheter Sensor Enabled, Abbott, MN)

PROCEDUREActivation Mapping

VT Activation Mapping can localize reentry circuits, and the diastolic pathway isthmus is the desirable target for ablation when possible because it can eliminate the elements required for reentry. In fact, activation mapping of the entire diastolic pathway is associated with higher freedom from VT recurrences compared to substrate modification Device use for mapping and ablation procedure: FlexAbility/Tactiflex/TactiCath Ablation Catheter Sensor Enabled (Abbott, MN), high-density grid mapping catheter (GMC; Advisor HD Grid Mapping Catheter Sensor Enabled, Abbott, MN)

Sponsors

IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with an implanted ICD (all brands) * Patients with the indication for Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation (both first and redo procedures), supported by EnSite 3D mapping system, for the following disease aetiologies: previous MI, myocarditis, arrhythmogenic right/left ventricular dysplasia * Age: 18 years or more. * A participant is willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the trial and is available to respect the assessments described in the protocol and informed consent form.

Exclusion criteria

* Contraindication to anticoagulants. * Presence of thrombi. * Presence of Mitral and Aortic prosthetic valve. * Recent (less than 3 months) myocardial infarction, unstable angina, or Coronary Artery Bypass. * Ventricular Tachycardia caused by reversible pathology. * Life expectancy less than 1 year, according to the investigator. * Contraindications to the use of ablation/diagnostic catheters or to cardiac catheterization. * Female participant who is pregnant, lactating, or planning pregnancy during the course of the trial.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
VT recurrence free survival rateafter 12 months from the procedureCompare the efficacy of substrate-based DEEP mapping versus Activation mapping in guiding catheter ablation to prevent VT recurrences
Procedural feasibilityDuring the index procedurePercentage of patients in which the mapping strategy was achievable and reasons for failure.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Procedural data.During the index procedureProcedure duration (minutes)
Hemodynamic VT toleranceDuring the index procedureHemodynamic decompensation during the procedure. (Arterial blood pressure \<80 mmHg)
Clinical follow up data.after 12 months from the procedure* Number of ICD shocks at follow-up * Rate of subsequent hospitalizations for VT recurrence/HF * Cardiac mortality.

Countries

Italy

Contacts

CONTACTAndrea Radinovic, MD
radinovic.andrea@hsr.it+390226436316
CONTACTAnna Montagna, PhD
montagna.anna@hsr.it+390226437489

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 28, 2026