Skip to content

Comparison of Septal Advancement Flap and Columellar Strut Effect on Nasal Tip

Comparison of Septal Advancement Flap and Columellar Strut in Preserving, Restructuring, and Reshaping the Nasal Tip Contour in Rhinoplasty

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06370455
Enrollment
30
Registered
2024-04-17
Start date
2024-01-23
Completion date
2025-10-25
Last updated
2025-12-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Rhinoplasty

Brief summary

The aim of the study to compare and evaluate the effect of septal advancement flap in preserving and reshaping the nasal tip with columellar strut graft

Detailed description

The ideal tip support graft should support the exact position over time, avoid stiffness of a natural soft structure of the tip, be easily harvested typically septal cartilage, facilitate surgeon control of rotation and projection. To address these desirable features the septal advancement flap (SAF) was developed. The septal advancement flap (SAF) is a rotational advancement flap of the superior and caudal aspects of the cartilaginous septum that enables the surgeon to create stable and accurate tip shape and position. This is a technically easy and reliable flap mainly applicable to primary rhinoplasty. so investigator compare between this new technique and old one like columellar strut to know the effect on nasal tip

Interventions

PROCEDUREcomparison of septal advancement flap effect on nasal tip in primary rhinoplasty to columellar strut technique

All patients will be operated on under general anesthesia through an open rhinoplasty then will undergo 2 different procedures according to each group.

Sponsors

Tanta University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SCREENING
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Droopy nasal tip

Exclusion criteria

* severely deficient cartilaginous septum. * previous nasal operations, history of cleft lip or cleft palate. * bleeding disorders.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
subjective assessment using Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation Questionnairepreoperative and one month postoperativeAssessment of patient satisfaction with primary septorhinoplasty using the Arabic Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation (ROE) Questionnaire and comparing the preoperative with postoperative scores. The ROE comprises 6 questions. Each answer is scored on a scale from 0-4, where 0 corresponds to the most negative answer and 4 corresponds to the most positive answer. As a result, the total score can range from 0 to 24. To make the results easier to understand, the total score can be divided by 24 and multiplied by 100 to obtain a value between 0% and 100%, where higher values represent greater patient satisfaction.
measuring the degree of tip projection and rotation preoperative and postoperativePreoperative,one month and six months postoperativeObjective assessment by measuring the degree of tip projection and rotation preoperative and postoperative by using the angle between the columella and the line intersecting the junction between the columella and the upper lip and the vermilion border of the upper lip for measuring the nasolabial angle.

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026