Skip to content

Clinical Study to Evaluate the Anti-adhesion Efficacy and Safety of MegaShield®-SP in Comparison With Guardix-SP Plus After Spine Surgery

Clinical Study to Evaluate the Anti-adhesion Efficacy and Safety of MegaShield®-SP in Comparison With Guardix-SP Plus After Spine Surgery: A Multicenter, Randomized, Subjects-independent Evaluator Blinded, Active-control Comparative, Non-inferior, Prospective Confirmatory Clinical Study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06369233
Enrollment
80
Registered
2024-04-16
Start date
2024-04-01
Completion date
2026-11-30
Last updated
2026-08-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Herniation, Disc

Keywords

disc herniation, laminectomy, anti-adhesion, disc resection, MegaShield, MegaShield-SP

Brief summary

This study is Interventional, Parallel, Double-blinded, Randomized study. Subjects aged 20 to 70 years who had a Lumbar discectomy or laminectomy, MegaShield-SP® and Guardix-SP Plus will be applied.

Detailed description

To evaluate preventing adhesion, the study group is compared with MegaShield®-SP or Guardix-SP Plus after Lumbar discectomy or laminectomy. Afterwards, they visit at 2 weeks, 12 weeks to conduct examinations and assess Questionnaires.

Interventions

DEVICEMegaShield®-SP

MegaShield®-SP application Lumbar discectomy or laminectomy

DEVICEGuardix-SP Plus

Guardix-SP Plus application Lumbar discectomy or laminectomy

Sponsors

L&C Bio
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients aged 20 to 70 years. * Patient diagnosed with single-level lumbar disc herniation and scheduled to perform Lumbar discectomy, or patients diagnosed with single-level spinal stenosis and scheduled to perform laminectomy. * Patients who voluntarily decide to participate in the study and voluntarily agree in writing to the informed consent form.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients diagnosed with multi-level lumbar disc herniation or lumbar disectomy ,far lateral lumbar disc herniation(FLLDH). * Patient diagnosed with spinal cord disease * Patient who needs spinal fusion * Patient who has previous experience in spinal surgery * Patient diagnosed with a serious liver or kidney disease * Patients with lymph fluid or blood clotting disorder or taking antithrombotic or antiplatelet agents * Patients with uncontrolled diabetes that may affect surgery or postoperative progress according to the investigator's judgment, * Patients with immunocompromised or autoimmune diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis or systemic erythematosus lupus, and severe systemic immune disease * Patients with infectious diseases or healing disorders that can interfere with the normal healing process after surgery * Patients who received steroid epidural injections within 2 weeks from the date of screening or who took oral steroids within 24 hours * Patients who participated in other clinical trials within 30 days from the date of screening * Patients who are unable to take MRI scans * Pregnant or lactating women * Patients who are not eligible for clinical trials according to the investigator's judgement * Patients with a history of hypersensitivity to the main and other components of the investigational device * Patients who are scheduled to receive myelogram or lumbar puncture within 24 hours from the application of the investigational device

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
MRI scar scoreAt 12 weeks after surgeryPrimary effectiveness endpoint (0\~4, low Scar score through MRI means better)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Oswestry Disability Index(ODI) scoreBefore surgery, At 2, 12 weeks after surgerySecondary effectiveness endpoint (0\~50, low ODI score means better)
Visual Analog Scale(VAS) Back & Leg Pain ScoreBefore surgery, At 2, 12 weeks after surgerySecondary effectiveness endpoint (0\~100, low VAS score means better)

Countries

South Korea

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORSiyoung Park

Yonsei University College of Medicine, Severance Hospital

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Aug 27, 2026