Skip to content

Continuous Veno-venous Hemodialysis and Continuous Veno-venous Hemodiafiltration on Urea Reduction Rate in Intensive Care Patient

Comparison of the Effectiveness of Continuous Veno-venous Hemodialysis and Continuous Veno-venous Hemodiafiltration on Urea Reduction Rate in Intensive Care Patients With Acute Renal Injury : a Monocentric Controled Randomized Non Inferiority Open Labeled Study

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06369064
Acronym
CompEER
Enrollment
80
Registered
2024-04-16
Start date
2024-07-03
Completion date
2028-08-15
Last updated
2026-05-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute Kidney Injury, Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy, Intensive Care Unit

Keywords

continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration, continuous venovenous hemodialysis, urea reduction rate

Brief summary

In patients requiring renal replacement therapy (RRT) in the intensive care unit (ICU), continuous techniques are predominantly using due to better hemodynamic tolerance. The most employed techniques in ICU are continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF) and continuous venovenous hemodialysis (CVVHD). To our knowledge, there are no prospective studies comparing the efficiency of these two techniques with the same dose of dialysis (and the same filter). In the CompEER study, we aim to compare the efficiency of CVVHD and CVVHDF on urea reduction rate in intensive care patients with acute kidney injury. The research hypothesis is that CVVHD citrate technique is as effective as CVVHDF heparin technique for urea reduction and provides prolonged and stable clearance, facilitating antibiotic management during RRT.

Detailed description

Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) is found in more than 50% of intensive care unit (ICU) patients, with 30% classified as AKI Network (AKIN) stage 3. Approximately 23% of AKI patients undergo RRT, predominantly utilizing continuous techniques due to better hemodynamic tolerance in unstable patients. Common continuous RRT techniques include continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH), continuous venovenous hemodialysis (CVVHD), and continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF). The two most employed techniques in ICU are CVVHDF and CVVHD. However, the choice often depends on institutional practices rather than scientific evidence. Limited studies comparing these techniques at equivalent doses exist, and French recommendations allow intensivists discretion based on availability and team experience. A small, randomized study comparing different exchange rates found higher urea reduction in CVVHDF but lacked statistical significance. Current practices in ICU involve using CVVHDF with systemic anticoagulation or CVVHD with regional citrate anticoagulation based on practitioner preferences. Despite potential benefits of CVVHD with citrate, such as extended filter lifespan and stable dialysis dose, the impact on concomitant treatments, especially antibiotics, needs consideration. The study aims to demonstrate the non-inferiority of citrate-based continuous hemodialysis (CVVHD) compared to heparin-based continuous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF) in terms of urea reduction rate at 24 hours in AKI patients requiring renal replacement therapy. The hypothesis is that CVVHD citrate is as effective as CVVHDF heparin, providing prolonged and stable clearance, facilitating antibiotic management during RRT.

Interventions

OTHERCVVHD Dialysis parameters

Patients will receive a CVVHD dialysis with a dose of 25ml/kg/h dialysate (100% dialysate), with Fresenius Medical Care multiFiltrate PRO kit and Ultraflux AV1000S filter (polysuflone 1.8m²).Regional anticoagulation with citrate

OTHERCVVHDF Dialysis parameters

Patients will receive a CVVHDF dialysis with a dose of 25ml/kg/h dialysate (50% ultrafiltration, 50% dialysate), with Fresenius Medical Care multiFiltrate PRO kit and Ultraflux AV1000S filter (polysuflone 1.8m²). Systemic anticoagulation with heparine

Sponsors

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adult patients hospitalized in ICU * Undergo RRT session because of AKI stage 3 * At least one among criteria: pH \< 7,20 / Blood urea \> 30mM / Fluid overload uncontrolled by with PaCO₂ \< 35 mmHg or mixed acidosis with PaCO₂ \< 50 mmHg. * Oliguria lasting 72 hours or longer * Patients undergoing their first session of extracorporeal blood purification, initiated less than 12 hours prior to randomization * Patient having given free and informed consent, and having signed the consent form or patient included in an emergency situation * Patient affiliated with Social Security.

Exclusion criteria

* End-stage chronic kidney disease on dialysis * Intoxication with a dialyzable toxin (lithium * Criteria for emergency dialysis initiation: hyperkaliemia \>6,5mM with electrocardiographic signs * Medical contraindication to regional citrate: severe liver failure * Medical contraindication to anticoagulation or heparin anticoagulation: heparin induced thrombopenia or uncontrolled bleeding * Pregnant women, parturient or breast-feeding patient

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
urea reduction rate (URR)24 hoursThe primary endpoint is the rate of urea reduction (TRU) at 24h as a percentage TRU H24 = (urea rate at H0 - urea rate at H24) / urea rate at H0 in each arm.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Creatinine clearance at H2424 hoursMeasured Creatinine clearance at 24 hours (ml/min)
Urea clearance at H2424 hoursMeasured Urea clearance at 24 hours (ml/min)
Urea clearance at H4848 hoursMeasured Urea clearance at 48 hours (ml/min)
ICU MortalityEnd of ICU StayNumber of patients who died while in ICU
Mortality at Day 28Day 28Number of patients who died betwwen day à and day 28
Organ failure-free days at Day 28Day 28Number of organ failure-free days at Day 28
Hypokalemia at Day 28Day 28Hypokalemia \< 3mmol/l occurring between Day 0 and Day 28
Hypophosphatemia at Day 28Day 28Hypophosphatemia \< 0.8mmol/l occurring between Day 0 and Day 28
Hypomagnesemia at Day 28Day 28Hypomagnesemia \< 0.8mmol/l occurring between Day 0 and Day 28
Hyperkalemia at Day 28Day 28Hyperkalemia \>6mmol/l occurring between Day 0 and Day 28
Medical Cost24 hoursCost of one continuous hemodialysis (CVVHD) session with citrate compared to one continuous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF)

Countries

France

Contacts

CONTACTClaire Roger, MD
Claire.roger@chu-nimes.fr04.66.68.30.50
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORClaire Roger

CHU Nimes

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 19, 2026