Anxiety Disorders
Conditions
Keywords
Adolescents, Anxiety Disorders, Cognitive behavioral therapy, Internet-based, Digital health
Brief summary
The goal of the randomized controlled trial is to find out if the internet-based therapy (iCBT) intervention CoolMinds, is effective in helping adolescents with anxiety. The adolescents in the study are aged between 12 and 17 years of age, who live in the region of Southern Denmark. They must have an anxiety diagnosis according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual-5 (DSM-5) criteria. The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. If getting anxiety treatment with CoolMinds will lead to a greater reduction in anxiety symptoms, compared to a waitlist. 2. What effect different degrees of therapist support have on the treatment. Participants will be getting 14 weeks of the iCBT intervention CoolMinds, and they will be asked to answer questionnaires about their mental health before and after the treatment. Researchers will compare three different groups, with 56 adolescents in each group. The first group will receive iCBT with weekly scheduled feedback. The second group will get iCBT with feedback whenever the adolescents ask for it. The last group will be on a waiting list for 14 weeks, before receiving treatment.
Detailed description
Introduction Among children and adolescents the most prevalent mental health conditions are anxiety disorders, with around 5-12% of youth in western countries fulfilling the criteria for an anxiety diagnosis. Evidence points to an increase in the prevalence of anxiety disorders during the transition from childhood to adolescence and from adolescence to adulthood up to age 30. Untreated anxiety disorders tend to chronify or become recurrent in the developmental course and persist into adulthood. Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), in both individual and group format, is effective in treating young people with anxiety. Despite the existence of effective treatment options and the possible long-term consequences associated with untreated anxiety disorders in youth, it is estimated that less than 25% of children and adolescents with anxiety disorders receive professional help, with fewer receiving evidence-based treatment. Frequently mentioned barriers for adolescents opting to seek treatment include social stigma, shyness and fear of peer rejection, preference for self-reliance, confidentiality, privacy and anonymity concerns, worries concerning treatment costs, transportation or waiting times and limited availability of psychological treatment. Thus, it is of the utmost importance to consider these barriers when developing interventions to overcome these and thus increase treatment accessibility. Internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy (iCBT) may be an effective alternative to face-to-face treatment, that can address some of the aforementioned barriers to treatment by providing greater flexibility, greater autonomy, reduced expenses, and eliminate travel time. To date, fourteen randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have evaluated iCBT programs in both children and adolescents with anxiety disorders. Four of these included predominantly or only adolescents and showed promising results with between group effect sizes ranging from d = 0.65-1.04 at follow-up. Objectives The primary aim of the present study is to examine the efficacy of an internet-delivered cognitive behavioral therapy intervention, CoolMinds, in adolescents aged 12-17 years, when delivered with planned feedback or on-demand feedback from a therapist compared to a waitlist control. Additionally, the study will explore the efficacy of delivering one booster session compared to none. It is hypothesized that: 1. CoolMinds will lead to a greater reduction in anxiety symptoms compared to the waitlist control. 2. The effect of CoolMinds will be independent of the degree of therapist support. Design: The study is designed as a superiority randomized controlled trial with the three conditions 1) iCBT with planned feedback 2) iCBT with on-demand feedback and 3) waitlist control. The allocation ratio is 1:1:1 for each condition. The participants will be stratified by aged into the age groups 12-14 years and 15-17 years respectively to secure an even age distribution across conditions. Additionally all participants that are active in the program for the first 8 weeks, will be randomized to receive or not receive a booster session 10 weeks after finishing the intervention with an allocation ratio of 1:1. The study will be conducted at Center for Digital Psychiatry, an online clinic and research facility that is part of the psychiatric hospital in the region of southern Denmark, and at Center for Psychological Treatment of Children and Adolescents, a research and teaching center at Aarhus university, Denmark. All data will be collected from these two centers in Denmark. Participants and recruitment: All participants will have to register through a website to participate in the project. As part of the registration, the participants will have to fill out an initial screening questionnaire that assesses exclusion criteria. If an exclusion criteria is met, the participant will automatically be informed within the questionnaire that they are unable to participate and is given the choice to continue or discontinue their answering. Data will be collected with a parent and adolescent questionnaire at five points: pre-treatment (T1), post-treatment (T2) and at follow-ups after 3, 6 and 12 months (T3, T4, T5). Participants in the waitlist control group will be offered guided iCBT with planned feedback at post-treatment (T2).
Interventions
The intervention consists of 14 weeks of iCBT, where the main treatment components are psychoeducation, cognitive restructuring, exposure therapy, and relapse prevention. The program comprises eleven sessions for adolescents and ten sessions for parents to be completed simultaneously. The participants will have the opportunity to get therapist feedback during the treatment period, the therapist may spend a maximum of 15 minutes giving feedback per week per participant.
Sponsors
Study design
Masking description
As the study concerns itself with psychotherapy and examines the difference in therapist support, it is practically impossible to blind participants and clinicians, and thus they are not blinded. The research team is involved in the day-to-day operation of the project, including the screening for suicidality, why blinding of the research team is also practically impossible with the current setup. However the analyzes of the trial results will be pseudo-anonymized, so that only the ID number appears on the data sheet in order to get as close to blinding as possible in relation to the research design.
Intervention model description
The RCT is designed as a superiority RCT with the three conditions 1) iCBT with planned feedback 2) iCBT with on-demand feedback and 3) waitlist control. The allocation ratio is 1:1:1 for each condition. The participants will be stratified by aged into the age groups 12-14 years and 15-17 years respectively to secure an even age distribution across conditions. Additionally upon completing session 8 in the program, participants will be randomized to receive or not receive a booster session 12 weeks after finishing the intervention with an allocation ratio of 1:1. The design of the randomized trial is thus factorial including two factors: type of therapist feedback (factor 1) and booster or no booster (factor 2). Data will be collected with parent and adolescent questionnaires at five time points: pre-treatment, post-treatment and at follow-ups after 3, 6 and 12 months.
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Between 12 and 17 years of age. * Have a principal anxiety diagnosis according to DSM-5 criteria. * The ability to read and write Danish. * Internet access. * A parent able to participate in treatment alongside the adolescent.
Exclusion criteria
* Autism spectrum disorder. * Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. * Psychotic symptoms. * Bipolar disorder. * Current suicidal ideation or self-mutilating behavior. * Current alcohol or substance abuse. * A score of 5 or above on ADIS * Current eating disorder. * Received CBT for an anxiety disorder within the past 12 months.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| The Youth Online Diagnostic Assessment - Child and Parent Versions | Pre-treatment, immediately after treatment and at 3-month follow-up | An online diagnostic assessment tool that assesses DSM-5 anxiety disorders and specific phobias based on the Anxiety and Related Disorders Interview Schedule for DSM-5, which is considered the golden standard. |
| Spence Children's Anxiety Scale- Child and Parent Versions | Pre-treatment, immediately after treatment and at 3- 6- 12-month follow-up | A 44-item self-report questionnaire assessing anxiety symptoms of six different anxiety disorders in DSM-IV. The responses are scored on a 4 point scale ranging from 0 to 3, with a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 114, higher scores mean a higher level of anxiety. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Child Anxiety Life Interference Scale- Child and Parent Version | Pre-treatment, immediately after treatment and at 3- 6- 12-month follow-up | A 10-item self-report questionnaire assessing the impact of youth anxiety on various areas of life functioning such as school, extracurricular activities, family life and friendships. The responses are scored on a likert scale ranging from 0 to 4, with higher scores indicating higher anxiety life interference, minimum score is 0, maximum score is 36. |
| The Mood and Feelings Questionnaire- Child and Parent Version | Pre-treatment, immediately after treatment and at 3- 6- 12-month follow-up | A 33-item self-report questionnaire assessing depression in youth, The responses are scored from 0 to 2, with higher scores suggest more severe depressive symptoms. Minimum score is 0, maximum score is 66. |
| Working Alliance Inventory - Short Form | Immediately after treatment and every 14 days during the treatment period | A 12-item self-report questionnaire assessing the therapeutic alliance, the responses are scored from 1 to 7, minimum total score 12 to maximum total score of 84, higher scores reflect a more positive rating of working alliance. |
| Working Alliance Inventory for Online Interventions | Immediately after treatment | A 36- items self-report questionnaire assessing the technical alliance, the responses are scored from 1 to 7, minimum total score 36 to maximum total score of 252, higher scores reflect a more positive rating of working alliance. |
Other
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Sociodemographic measures | pre-treatment | s will be gathered on parents regarding age, level of education, civil status, gender and primary caregiver in case of single parents. For the adolescents, information will be gathered regarding age and gender |
| Engagement | Immediately after treatment | with the treatment will be measured objectively using the number of logins to the treatment program as well as number of words per message sent to the therapist and number of words per text box in the modules. This will be registered for both adolescents and parents. |
| Children´s Anxiety Scale | weekly questionnaire | A 8-item abbreviated version of the Spence Children's Anxiety Scale containing 8 of the original 44-items. The responses are scored from 0 to 3, with a minimum total score of 0, to a maximum total score of 24. Higher scores mean a higher level of anxiety. |
| The Anxiety Disorders Interview Schedule for Children | pre-treatment | Depression will be measured oral during the clinical interview, with The Anxiety Disorders Interview Schedule for Children as The Youth Online Diagnostic Assessment depression module is not translated to Danish. |
| Cost-effectiveness | Immediately after treatment | Will be measured by self-report questionnaire about the number of days absent from school, if they have been in contact with self-paid psychiatrist or psychologist during the study and the use of communal services. |
| The Short Mood and Feelings questionnaire | Weekly questionnaire | A 13-items self-report questionnaire with an added item about suicidal thoughts and ideation will assess the level of depressive symptoms and risk of suicide. The responses are scored from 0 to 2, with a minimum total score of 0, to a maximum total score of 26. with higher scores suggest more severe depressive symptoms. |
| EuroQol-5 Dimension Youth | Pre-treatment, immediately after treatment and at 3- 6- 12-month follow-up | A 5-item self-report questionnaire assessing quality of life and self-rated health. The items cover five domains: mobility, selfcare, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety and depression. The responses are scored from 1 to 5, with a minimum total score of 5, to a maximum total score of 25. Higher score suggest problems with the different dimensions. |
| Client Satisfaction Questionnaire-8 | Immediately after treatment | An 8-item questionnaire used to measure general satisfaction with a received treatment.The responses are scored from 1 to 4, with a minimum total score of 8, to a maximum total score of 32, with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction. |
| Systems Usability Scale | Immediately after treatment | A 10-item questionnaire used to assess the subjective experience of usability of a higher score computer system. The responses are scored from 1 to 5, the participant´s scores for each question are converted to a new number, added together and then multiplied by 2.5 to make a scale with a minimum total score of 0, to a maximum total score of 100. A higher score indicates greater system usability. |
| Negative Effects Questionnaire | Immediately after treatment | A 20-item questionnaire used to monitor the occurrence of negative effects in psychological treatments. The responses are scored from 0-4, with a minimum total score of 0, to a maximum total score of 80. A higher score indicates, more negative effects. |
Countries
Denmark