En-mass Retraction by KILBON Versus CAT Appliances

Effectiveness Of Lingual Retractor Versus Clear Aligner Appliances In En-mass Retraction Of Maxillary Anterior Teeth Segment In Adult Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Status

Not yet recruiting

Phases

Study type

Interventional

Source

ClinicalTrials.gov

Registry ID

NCT06366737

Enrollment

Registered

2024-04-16

Start date

2024-10-31

Completion date

2025-08-31

Last updated

2024-09-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Maxillary Prognathism

Brief summary

en-mass retraction by lingual retractor versus clear alighner therapy

Detailed description

Comparative Effectiveness Of Lingual Retractor Versus Clear Aligner Appliances In Adult Patients With Maxillary Dentoalveolar Protrusion Treated By Upper First Premolars Extraction And Enmass Retraction Of Maxillary Anterior Teeth Segment Using Palatal Orthodontic Miniscrews :A Randomized Clinical Trial

Interventions

DEVICEKILBON Appliance

palatal TAD assissted lingual appliance for en-mass retraction

DEVICECAT appliance

palatal TAD assissted clear aligner

Study design

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Intervention model

PARALLEL

Primary purpose

TREATMENT

Masking

SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

ALL

Age

18 Years to No maximum

Healthy volunteers

Yes

Inclusion criteria

* adult patients with maxillary dentoalveolar protrusion with mild crowding

Exclusion criteria

* \- adult patients with maxillary dentoalveolar protrusion with moderate to severe crowding

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame	Description
Patient satisfaction during & after phase I treatment.	6 months	questionnaire

Secondary

Measure	Time frame	Description
inclination of upper anterior teeth	6 months	angle measurement of long axis of maxillary central to maxillary plane in degrees

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026