Skip to content

WoW - Single- vs Two-staged Excisions of Thin Melanoma

Wise vs Wide: A National, Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized and Controlled, Parallel Group, Non-inferiority Study to Compare Single- vs Two-staged Excisions of Thin Melanoma

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06363591
Acronym
WoW
Enrollment
2486
Registered
2024-04-12
Start date
2025-01-22
Completion date
2039-12-31
Last updated
2025-03-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Melanoma

Keywords

Melanoma, Surgery, Wide local excision, Recurrence, Metastasis, Death

Brief summary

The overall aim of this national, multicenter, prospective, randomized, and controlled study is to enhance the management of patients with thin melanoma (≤1 mm Breslow thickness). The investigators hypothesize that wide local excisions (WLEs) following complete excision of thin melanoma do not affect the risk of recurrence, defined as the occurrence of local, regional, distant disease, or melanoma-specific death during a 5- to 10-year follow-up period.

Detailed description

Melanoma is one of the most common forms of skin cancer and has become the third most common type of cancer among men and the fourth most common among women in Sweden. The mortality associated with melanoma is strongly linked to the thickness of the original tumor. Thicker tumors generally have a worse prognosis compared to thinner tumors. In melanoma in situ (MIS), the tumor is confined to the epidermis and cannot spread. In invasive melanoma, the tumor has grown into the dermis. The thickness of these invasive melanomas is measured using the Breslow thickness. Thinner invasive melanomas with a Breslow thickness of ≤1.0 mm constitute the majority of cases in Sweden and have an excellent prognosis with a 10-year disease-specific survival rate of 97%. Melanoma represents a significant economic burden with increasing healthcare costs. Early detection and cost-effective treatment strategies are therefore important to improve prognosis, reduce costs, and avoid unnecessary overtreatment. Surgical methods for treating melanoma vary depending on the thickness of the tumor. Traditionally, a two-step procedure has been used. Initially, a diagnostic excision (surgery to remove the tumor) with a narrow clinical margin is performed. Once melanoma is confirmed, a second wide local excision (WLE) is performed around the surgical scar with a 1-2 cm clinical margin depending on the exact Breslow thickness. This method has evolved over time, and narrower clinical margins are now used in the WLE than previously. However, researchers have begun to question whether a WLE is necessary at all for thin melanomas if the tumor is completely removed during the initial diagnostic excision. Researchers are now exploring a more personalized treatment strategy that considers histopathological margins instead of a standardized clinical margin. For well-defined melanomas, a clinical margin of 3-5 mm may be sufficient to ensure that the melanoma is removed with an acceptable histopathological margin (≥1.5 mm). The hypothesis is that this margin may be adequate and that the WLE does not reduce the risk of local, regional or distant disease nor melanoma-specific death. If the hypothesis is proven, unnecessary surgery, patient suffering, risk of complications, resource utilization, and healthcare costs could be reduced. The investigators now want to investigate whether there is a difference in the risk of recurrence, spread, and/or death for patients with thin melanomas (≤1mm Breslow thickness) treated with only one excision compared to the current standard of two excisions.

Interventions

PROCEDURESurgery

Wise or wide excision

No wide local excision

Sponsors

Region Stockholm
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
Region Skane
CollaboratorOTHER
Region Västerbotten
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
Region Örebro County
CollaboratorOTHER
Blekinge County Council Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Region Östergötland
CollaboratorOTHER
Dalarna County Council, Sweden
CollaboratorOTHER
Vastra Gotaland Region
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Patients with thin (≤1.0 mm) invasive melanomas excised with a histopathological margin ≥1.5 mm will be offered to participate following informed consent and randomization (1:1) to either: 1. Standard treatment with a WLE of the diagnostic excision scar with a lateral clinical surgical margin of 10 mm and a deep clinical surgical margin down to the muscular fascia as recommended by the Swedish national guidelines. or 2. Experimental treatment with no WLE.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Patients need to fulfill all criteria listed below: * Has recently been diagnosed with a primary invasive cutaneous melanoma of Breslow thickness ≤1.0 mm (pT1) as determined by a diagnostic excision with subsequent histopathological analysis that: 1. Is located on a body location in which a WLE with a 10-mm clinical margin is feasible and would have been planned according to current standard of care. 2. Had histopathologically verified free margins of at least 1.5 mm. * Is 18 years or older at time of consent. * Is able to give informed consent and comply with the treatment protocol and follow-up plan. * Has a life expectancy of ≥5 years from the time of diagnosis.

Exclusion criteria

If any of the listed criteria below are present, the patient is ineligible for study participation. The study lesion: * was partially biopsied prior to the diagnostic excision. * was diagnostically excised with a clinical margin \>5 mm. * was a melanoma of desmoplastic or lentiginous (i.e. lentigo maligna or acral lentiginous) subtype. * was located on digits in which amputation is necessary. The patient: * had a previous or concurrent MIS or invasive melanoma (cutaneous or non-cutaneous). * had physical, clinical, radiographic or pathologic evidence of microsatellite, satellite, in-transit, regional or distant metastatic melanoma. * had a previous or intercurrent treated solid tumor or hematologic malignancy during the past 5 years except cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma or basal cell carcinoma. * has planned adjuvant radiotherapy to the primary melanoma site after WLE.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Recurrence rate at 5 years.5 yearsRecurrence is defined as any presence of local/regional/distant disease or melanoma-specific death.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Recurrence rate at 10 years.10 yearsRecurrence is defined as any presence of local/regional/distant disease or melanoma-specific death.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient satisfaction3 monthsThe Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Treatment Satisfaction - Patient Satisfaction questionnaire (FACIT-TS-PS) is to be completed electronically or in clinic. The FACIT-TS-PS assesses patient satisfaction with treatment, with total scores ranging from 0 to 36, where higher scores indicate greater satisfaction with treatment.
Patients' quality of life3 monthsThe Quality of Life (QoL) questionnaire Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Melanoma (FACT-M) is to be completed electronically or in clinic. The FACT-M assesses quality of life in melanoma patients, with total scores ranging from 0 to 172, where higher scores indicate better quality of life.
Postoperative complications3 monthsDetermine the frequency of postoperative complications in both treatment groups.
Direct and indirect costs per patient5 yearsCalculate and compare costs per patient in the experimental and control groups.
Biomarkers10 yearsDifferences in biomarkers of recurrent and non-recurrent melanomas.
All-cause mortality5 yearsOverall all-cause mortality incidence in both treatment groups.
Scar length, width and quality1 yearMeasurement of the scar length and width as well as the scar quality assessed by both patient and clinician (measured with the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale, POSAS). The POSAS consists of two subscales: the Patient Scale and the Observer Scale, each ranging from 6 to 60, where a lower score indicates a better scar outcome.

Countries

Sweden

Contacts

Primary ContactJohn Paoli, Professor
john.paoli@vgregion.se0730404044

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026