Skip to content

The Impact of ESWT on Healing of Fractured Mandible

The Impact of Using Extracorporeal Radial Shock Wave Therapy as an Adjuvant Therapy vs Conventional Open Reduction and Internal Fixation With No Adjuvant Therapy on Bone Healing for Patients With Mandibular Parasymphyseal, Body and Angle Fractures

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06363188
Enrollment
10
Registered
2024-04-12
Start date
2024-02-01
Completion date
2025-08-30
Last updated
2024-04-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Fractured Mandible Due to Trauma

Brief summary

studying if using extracorporeal radial shockwave therapy as an adjuvant therapy help in accelerating the bone healing and regeneration in mandibular fractures by comparing it with the standard protocol for fractures fixation by plates and screws.

Detailed description

Firstly the patient heads to the operating room being placed in a supine position, generally anesthetized by the anesthesiologist. Sterilization of intraoral and extraoral sites and draping has been installed. Intermaxillary fixation (IMF) screws has been inserted in case of there is no arch bar is used. If the arch bar has been used it was inserted before the operation and being cut at the fracture line between the two segments. The transoral or extra-oral approach is utilized to expose the fracture line separating the two segments. Fixation of the bony segments with two plates one Compression 2.3 plate at the inferior border and Tension 2.0 plate five millimeter superiorly to the compression plate. or even one 2.0 plate(champy) Then suturing the incision layers with vicryl 3/0. Postoperative evaluation with cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). These procedures will be done for both groups. The control group with no adjuvant intervention will stop at this point. The other intervention group will be subjected to shockwave by the usage of extracorporeal shockwave device at the third day postoperative. Then follow up at the first and fourth month with another CBCT to compare the bone healing at the fracture site.

Interventions

a device used by physiotherapist to treat various musculoskeletal problems and it was here firstly used to accelerate the bone healing process after bone fracture

Sponsors

Cairo University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_ONLY
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years

Inclusion criteria

1 - Patients with age ranges from 18-75 years old. 2- Patients with fresh mandibular fractures (from zero hour till four or five days). 3- Patients free of systemic conditions that might affect or interfere with the healing process of bone segments or rather interfere with carrying out the surgical procedure (thyroid condition, rheumatoid arthritis, uncontrolled diabetes and osteoporosis).

Exclusion criteria

1 - Patients out of the specified range group 2- Patients who went previous operations with infection or malunion. 3- Patients with thyroid condition which affects the serum calcium level. 4- Patients with systemic conditions that might affect the bone health (osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, uncontrolled diabetes). 5- Patients with heart peacemakers.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
bone healing (denisty of bone)first and fourth monthradiographically we will analyze the bone denisty at the fracture site

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
pain sensationimmediately after the intervention and 3 days afterdepending on the patient using VAS

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

Primary Contactkhloud nasr el-din, GP.
khloud.ahmed@dentistry.cu.edu.eg01014919174
Backup ContactEmad Saied, prof.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026