Skip to content

Evaluate the Effectiveness and Safety of Raman IVD Analyzer in the Molecular Diagnosis of Gliomas During Surgery

Evaluate the Effectiveness and Safety of the Raman IVD Analyzer in the Molecular Diagnosis of Gliomas During Surgery, Using Samples From Brain Resection Tissue (Ambispective, Multicenter, Blind Evaluation, Single Group Target Value Method)

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06363162
Enrollment
200
Registered
2024-04-12
Start date
2022-12-01
Completion date
2025-12-31
Last updated
2024-04-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Glioma

Keywords

Molecular subtype, Raman, intraoperative, surgery

Brief summary

To distinguish various molecular subtypes of gliomas by spectra data obtained from Raman analyzer, including IDH mutant, 1p/19q-codeleted, ATRX deletion, TERT promoter mutation, MGMT promoter methylation, EGFR amplification, H3 K27-altered, TP53 mutant, PTEN deficiency, ki 67, AQP4, VEGF, and so on, comparing with the results of Immunohistochemistry or genetic test on the same brain tissue samples.

Detailed description

1500 samples were included retrospectively with the spectra data obtained from Raman analyzer to establish clinical intelligence model, modifying the analyzer. Based on statistical calculations, 200 glioma samples will be included in the trial in all trial centers prospectively. Compare the results between the Raman analyzer and Immunohistochemistry or genetic test results. And calculate the AUC, the accuracy, sensitivity, the specificity, and other indicators of Raman analyzer. During surgery, core tissue samples were taken from subjects. The test samples size:0.2cm\<length diameter ≤ 2cm. The sample testing result is based on the Raman test points. Then take the same tissue sample for Immunohistochemistry or genetic test. Statistical description of all data, including baseline data, all efficacy indicators, and all safety data. The measurement data give the mean, standard deviation, minimum, maximum, median,25 quantile and 75 quantile; Provide frequency and composition ratio for counting data. The baseline data was analyzed using the Full Analysis Set (FAS); The effectiveness analysis adopts FAS and PPS; The security analysis uses the Security Dataset (SS).

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTImmunohistochemistry or genetic test

Perform two diagnostic methods on the same sample

Sponsors

West China Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University
CollaboratorOTHER
Capital Medical University
CollaboratorOTHER
Jiangsu Raman Medical Equipment Co., Ltd.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Beijing Tiantan Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Masking description

Blind assessment: Researchers using Raman analyzer during surgery are not aware of the subjects' preoperative diagnostic results, while researchers conducting immunohistochemistry or genetic test after surgery are not aware of the subjects' preoperative diagnostic results and the diagnostic results of Raman analyzer.

Intervention model description

The same sample was diagnosed using Raman spectroscopy and immunohistochemistry or genetic test, respectively. Calculate the AUC, the accuracy, the sensitivity and specificity of a Raman analyzer using immunohistochemistry or genetic test results as the gold standard.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients who plan to undergo brain lesion tissue resection surgery or have preoperative clinical diagnosis of gliomas and plan to undergo biopsy; * Patients with clinical diagnosis of initial solitary gliomas, or initial solitary intracranial masses or initial non occupying lesions that do not exclude gliomas (such as intracranial metastatic lesions, intracranial infectious lesions, intracranial demyelinating lesions, central nervous system lymphoma, etc.), who have not received radiotherapy or chemotherapy in the past based on their medical history; * The patient or their guardian can understand the research purpose, demonstrate sufficient compliance with the trial protocol, consent for immunohistochemistry or genetic test, and sign an informed consent form; * It is possible to obtain tissue samples with a length diameter greater than 0.2cm. Patients diagnosed with initial solitary glioma should take core or marginal tissue, while patients diagnosed with initial single intracranial mass or initial non mass lesions but maybe with gliomas should be taken core tissue.

Exclusion criteria

Investigator judge that it is not suitable for inclusion.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Area Under the CurveThrough study completion, an average of 1 yearThe Area Under the Curve of the ROC curve illustrates the performance of Raman analyzer for the diagnosis of molecular subtype in glioma, confirmed by immunohistochemistry or genetic test.
AccuracyThrough study completion, an average of 1 yearThe proportion of tissue samples with consistent results between Raman analyzer detection and immunohistochemistry or genetic test.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Adverse Event Incidence RateDuring the surgeryNumber of subjects with AE/total number of subjects ×100%
SensitivityThrough study completion, an average of 1 yearAmong one kind of molecular subtype samples determined by immunohistochemistry or genetic test, the percentage of samples detected by Raman analyzer as the same molecular subtype.
SpecificityThrough study completion, an average of 1 yearAmong one kind of molecular subtype samples determined by immunohistochemistry or genetic test, the percentage of samples detected by Raman analyzer as the different molecular subtype.
Kappa coefficientThrough study completion, an average of 1 yearKappa coefficient≥0.75 indicates high consistency; 0.75\>Kappa coefficient≥0.4, considered consistent; If the Kappa coefficient is less than 0.4, it is considered inconsistent.
Time consumption for the Raman analyzer in detectionThrough study completion, an average of 1 yearTime required from emitting laser to completing single point detection
Serious Adverse Event Incidence RateDuring the surgeryNumber of subjects with SAE/total number of subjects ×100%
Operator adverse eventsThrough study completion, an average of 1 yearPossible damage to device operators during the use and maintenance of the Raman analyzers

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactWang Yinyan, MD and PhD
tiantanyinyan@126.com+86 13581698953

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026