Skip to content

Tele-Support for Emergency Medical Technicians

Tele-Support for Emergency Medical Technicians Dealing with Pediatric Cardiac Arrest: a Randomized, Simulation-based Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06362850
Acronym
POHCA
Enrollment
80
Registered
2024-04-12
Start date
2024-04-08
Completion date
2024-09-11
Last updated
2024-09-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cardiac Arrest

Keywords

simulation, pediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, advanced life support, eye tracking, cognitive load, emergency medicine, patient safety, telemedicine, anaesthesiology

Brief summary

In this manikin-based simulation study the impact of tele-support during a simulated pediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrest scenario on emergency medical technicians' guideline adherence, on gaze behavior as well as on performance of resuscitation management and cognitive load will be analyzed.

Detailed description

80 emergency medical technicians (EMT) will take part in this simulation study. The participants will be confronted with a scenario of an 8-year old boy, while wearing eye tracking glasses. In a parallel group design, the teams will be randomly assigned to a group performing advanced life support (ALS) without further support (group 1) or with additional tele-support (group 2). In case of support, an emergency physician assists the team performing the cardiopulmonary resuscitation management via a real-time remote connection.

Interventions

OTHERTele-support

via real-time audio-video connection through an experienced physician

Sponsors

Ludwig Boltzmann Institute Digital Health and Patient Safety
CollaboratorOTHER
Medical University of Vienna
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

In a manikin-based simulation study, the participants will be randomized to either performing the scenario with tele-support or without tele-support (80 participants 40 groups, 20 groups with tele-support, 20 groups without tele-support).

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Age 18-65 years * Active work as an emergency medical technician

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnancy * Prior knowledge of study setting or simulation scenario

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
guideline adherenceDay 1checklist (scale of 0-15 points)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
gaze behaviorDay 1dwell time in predefined areas of interest and fixation count
teamwork performanceDay 1Team Emergency Assessment Measure (11 items on scale 0-4 for components leadership, team work and task management resulting in a total score with scale 0-44; scale 1-10 for overall global rating)
cognitive loadDay 1NASA Taskload Index (scale of 0-20 points)
Performance of cardiopulmonary resuscitationDay 1Chest compressions (time to 1st compression, depth, frequency, total hands-off period); defibrillator: time to 1st rhythm analysis; ventilation: time to 1st ventilation, airway management; intravenous access: time to drug application; reversible causes: time to discussing potential reversible causes for cardiac arrest
Technical feasibilityDay 1time of detection of visual attention through eye-tracking glasses
UsabilityDay 1Questionnaire (5-point Likert scale) on usability of tele-support and eye-tracking glasses

Countries

Austria

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026