Skip to content

Sensory and Cognitive Predictions, and Their Disruptions in Schizophrenia

Sensory and Cognitive Predictions, and Their Disruptions in Schizophrenia

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06361407
Acronym
SensoSchiz
Enrollment
68
Registered
2024-04-11
Start date
2024-06-28
Completion date
2027-10-28
Last updated
2026-03-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Schizophrenia, Sensory Processing Disorder

Keywords

sensory prediction, motion perception, prediction error

Brief summary

Disturbances in the sense of self and time could play an important role in the development of psychotic symptoms. Previous work has shown that patients have difficulty preparing to process information on the scale of a second, but are abnormally disturbed by slightly asynchronous information on the millisecond scale. In both cases, the anomalies could explain the patients' unusual experience of time. The hypothesis in neurotypical patients is that small delays or asynchronies asynchronies are treated as irrelevant information and ignored and ignored, whereas in patients suffering from schizophrenia they would disrupt the flow of time. This hypothesis is tested with a new visual illusion.

Detailed description

In the task, two squares move at constant speed in a straight line towards each other. When they collide and disappear neurotypical individuals perceive a gap between the two squares rather than contact. This unexpected effect cannot be explained by a 'cognitive' expectation, since what is consciously expected is collision and contact. It has been shown that it is sensory predictions which explain the illusion of space at the moment of contact. Indeed, a movement trajectory is accompanied by sensory predictions, which help to anticipate the position of the moving object, and of the contrast between the edges of the squares and the background. At the moment of collision, the contrast disappears and is processed as a prediction error. If subjects do not have time to correct the error, they see a gap, as if the figure-ground contrast was still there. Conversely, when a rebound effect is introduced into the task (the squares are moved in the opposite direction after the collision), the illusion diminishes, as if the rebound reinforces the (top-down) expectation of a collision. Perturbations will be introduced during the trajectory in the illusion task with and without rebound to test this hypothesis (acceleration on a millisecond scale vs. uniform speed). Patients suffering from schizophrenia, whose prediction mechanisms are fragile, are expected to be abnormally sensitive to trajectory changes. The experimental manipulations will help to compare sensory prediction (illusion without rebound) and top-down (conscious) prediction (illusion with rebound). The protocol will also help to specify which types of prediction (sensory or cognitive) underlie patients' sense patients' sense of self. In short, the protocol is designed to improve the pathophysiological understanding of sense-of-self disorders in schizophrenia

Interventions

BEHAVIORALIllusion task

The task is the illusion already described in the arm description. All participants will additionally benefit from a short neuropsychological evaluation exploring attention (CPT-AX) and semantic knowledge (fNART) and a clinical evaluation exploring the sense of self (EASE).

Sponsors

Centre Psychothérapique de Nancy
Lead SponsorOTHER
Institut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale, France
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
NONE

Masking description

The group will be masked at the stage of data analysis. It cannot be masked at the prior stages

Intervention model description

Individuals with schizophrenia will be tested in parallel with neurotypicals

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Male or female; * Age between 18 and 60 inclusive; * Subject having dated and signed the consent form prior to the start of any trial-related procedure (guardian or curator where applicable); * Member of a social security scheme or beneficiary of such a scheme.

Exclusion criteria

* Psychoactive substance use disorders (as defined by the DSM-V) (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual-V); * Use of benzodiazepines, hallucinogens (in the period preceding before inclusion, for a duration equivalent to 5 half-lives of the product) or cannabis (in the 2 months preceding inclusion); * Neurological pathology or sequelae; * Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD); * Borderline personality disorder; * Disabling sensory disorders (visual acuity \<0.8); * Person deprived of liberty or under court protection; * Pregnant, parturient or breast-feeding women; * Subjects in a period of exclusion defined by another clinical study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Effect of a millisecond-level trajectory perturbationMonth 4Change in the rate of illusion in case of a trajectory perturbation (compared to the rate of illusion in the absence of perturbation)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Baseline rate of illusionmonth 4Frequency of the illusion perception when there is no trajectory perturbation and no rebound after the collision
Effect of a rebound (top-down, conscious influence)month 4Change in the rate of illusion in case of a rebound (compared to the rate of illusion in the absence of rebound)

Countries

France

Contacts

CONTACTAnne Giersch, MD PhD
giersch@unistra.fr0033 3 88 116471
CONTACTNaoual MELLOUKI BENDIMRED, PhD
unic@cpn-laxou.com0383925267
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORAnne Giersch, MD PhD

Institut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale, France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 26, 2026