Skip to content

Improvement Image Quality for SuperSonic® MACH Ultrasound System

Improvement Image Quality for SuperSonic® MACH Ultrasound System

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06360926
Acronym
MACH IQ
Enrollment
55
Registered
2024-04-11
Start date
2024-07-15
Completion date
2025-05-23
Last updated
2025-07-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diagnosis

Brief summary

The aim of this Study is to collect radiologist feedback to support the further development and improvement of the imaging modes implemented on the embedded software in the SuperSonic® Ultrasound System (including the probe).

Interventions

DEVICESuperSonic® Ultrasound System

SuperSonic® Ultrasound System equipped with new software iterations used with a new probe and CE marked probes. The new software and probe are the new study investigational device not CE marked

Sponsors

SuperSonic Imagine
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Subject is ≥ 18 years old and is able to understand and sign the informed consent form. * Subject is a minor \< 18 years old and the legal representative has signed the informed consent form. * Subject is scheduled for at least one or more routine ultrasounds. * Subject is affiliated to National Social Insurance or a Health Insurance Regimen.

Exclusion criteria

* Subject is unable or unwilling to adhere to Study procedures. * Subject or his/her legal representative if a minor is unable to express or understand informed consent. * Subject is under legal protection * Subject is deprived of liberty by judicial or administrative decision * Subject undergoes psychiatric treatment under constraint * Subject is admitted to a health or social establishment for purposes other than research * Subject has latex allergy. * Subject has an open wound, cut, and/or a rash which would preclude an ultrasound imaging procedure

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Qualitative assessment of image qualityDuring ultrasound procedureFollowing the two ultrasound procedures, the radiologist will rate the image quality produced by the Study Device, compared to that produced by the SOC ultrasound. A score from 1 to 5 (1: Not acceptable; 2: Acceptable; 3: Fair; 4: Good; 5: Excellent) for each of the characteristics of the image: General Aesthetics; Spatial Resolution; Contrast Resolution; Temporal Resolution; Penetration and Sensitivity

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026