Tooth Hypersensitivity
Conditions
Keywords
Dental Bleaching, Shade Stability
Brief summary
This study assessed the impact of four desensitizing agents on both color stability and dental sensitivity following a bleaching procedure, spanning from the 24-hour to the 1-year follow-up assessment periods.
Detailed description
Dental bleaching is a temporary treatment with potential adverse effects on dental sensitivity post-procedure. Therefore, the study aimed to evaluate dental color stability and sensitivity over a one-year period following bleaching, utilizing one of four desensitizing agents: PAMAM, MI Paste Plus, Hydroxyapatite and F (ReminPro), and Ultra EZ. The selection of the desensitizing agent was based on a predetermined randomization sequence generated in Microsoft Excel. Color stability was objectively assessed through spectrophotometric analysis, while subjective evaluation was conducted using the Vita Classic shade guide by two external observers not involved in the procedure. Dental sensitivity levels were tracked at various intervals using a visual analogue scale. Baseline measurements for both sensitivity and color stability were taken before the bleaching procedure, with subsequent evaluations at 24 hours, 3 days, 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, and 1 year post-bleaching. The study involved 60 patients from Ain Shams University seeking dental whitening treatment, divided into four groups based on the randomization sequence.
Interventions
Desensitizing agents was applied once after the bleaching procedure,as follows: 1-Bleaching/PAMAM group, patients received bleaching followed by the application of PAMAM for 30 minutes according to previous studies.
Desensitizing agents was applied once after the bleaching procedure, as follows: 2-Control group, where patients received hydrogen peroxide in-office bleaching followed by the application of manufacturer recommended desensitizing agent ( Ultra EZ) once for 60 minutes.
Desensitizing agents was applied once after the bleaching procedure, as follows: 3-Bleaching/MI Paste Plus group, patients received bleaching followed by the application of MI paste plus according to the manufacturer's instructions once for 3 minutes.
Desensitizing agents was applied once after the bleaching procedure, as follows: 4-Bleaching/Hydroxyapatite and F (ReminPro), patients received bleaching followed by the application of Hydroxyapatite and F (ReminPro) according to the manufacturer's instructions once for 3 minutes
Sponsors
Study design
Masking description
This clinical trail was a double blinded trail in which the participant and outcome assessor were blinded to allocation, thus the participant was unaware of which experimental material had been assigned to him/her. Also outcome assessors were blinded to the treatment that each participant had received
Intervention model description
This clinical study will be conducted to evaluate the effect of using 4th generation Poly amido amine dendrimer (PAMAM-COOH) as a desensitizing agent and compared with three different commercially available desensitizing materials: 3% potassium nitrate and 0.11% fluoride (Ultra EZ), as described by manufacturer, Casein-phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate with F, (MI paste plusTm), and Hydroxyapatite, Fluoride and Xylitol, Hydroxyapatite and F (ReminPro), on: 1. Long-term Post-bleaching hypersensitivity. 2. Long-term Post-bleaching shade stability. For Patients treated with 40% hydrogen-peroxide bleaching agent.
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Male and female patients will be selected according to the following inclusion criteria: * Participants should have their entire upper and lower teeth, from right first premolar to left first premolar, present and sound, without restorations or periodontal disease. * Teeth have never been bleached before. * The participants are required to have low-caries index. * Teeth should have a Vita-color shade of A2 or darker. * Cooperative behavior patient and medically free. * Patient ages between 18 to 40 years old.
Exclusion criteria
* Serious medically compromised patients. * Smoking, alcoholism. * Hypersensitivity to the agents used in the study. * Lactated, pregnant patients. * Patients have serious oral diseases, as acute necrotizing gingivitis, acute gingiva stomatitis, or undergoing orthodontic treatment. * Patients with dental enamel cracks. * Patients who had previous bleaching treatments
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Post-bleaching dental hypersensitivity | 24 hours 3 days, 7 days, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and one year post treatment | Assessment will be carried out by a visual analogue scale (VAS), from 0 (no tooth sensitivity at all) to 10 (intolerable pain). Air blast stimulus will be used and will be applied on the tooth at distance of 0.5-1 cm for 2 seconds by the maximum power of the compressed air jet from the dental unit. Then sensitivity was measured before bleaching (baseline) and at each follow up period, 24 hours, 3 days, 7 days, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, and one year post treatment |
| Shade stability | 24 hours 3 days, 7 days, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and one year post treatment | Assesment was carried out using Vita Easy shade V . Two measurements were taken for each tooth from the upper right canine to the upper left canine, and same for the lower arch. For light condition standardization, all shade measurements were carried out under natural daylight the clinic lights with the dental unit light away from the patient. The shade of each tooth was recorded as well as the values of L, a, and b. The shade of the upper two centrals was confirmed using Vita Classical shade guide. Shade assesment was carried out before bleaching and at each follow up periods, 24 hours, 3 days, 7 days, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, and one year post treatment |
Countries
Egypt