Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Atrial Fibrillation, Heart Diseases
Conditions
Keywords
Transseptal puncture, Left atrial access, Transseptal catheterization, Radiofrequency
Brief summary
The purpose of this study is to compare and assess efficacy and safety between the study device "TS-RF system consisting of a electrosurgical system, general-purpose (TS-RF Generator) and a electrosurgical system electrode, hand-controlled, general-purpose, single-use (TS-RF Needle)" and the control device "needle, puncture, single-use (BRK Transseptal needle)", both of which are used for the transseptal puncture performed to enable left atrial access for the treatment of symptomatic arrhythmia and mitral stenosis and then to demonstrate that the study device is non-inferior to the control device.
Detailed description
The efficacy and safety of radiofrequency (RF) needles in transseptal puncture have been well established through several comparative clinical studies. In foreign countries, RF needles have already been used for transseptal puncture for more than 20 years since the FDA approval of the first RF Needle. However, in Korea, despite the fact that it has been approximately 30 years since the initiation of radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) for the treatment of arrhythmia, only the conventional mechanical needles have still been available after authorization for transseptal puncture that is the key for the treatment of cardiac disorders such as mitral stenosis as well as a part of RFCA for the treatment of arrhythmia. Therefore, this study aims to compare and assess efficacy and safety between the study device "TS-RF system consisting of a electrosurgical system, general-purpose (TS-RF Generator) and a electrosurgical system electrode, hand-controlled, general-purpose, single-use (TS-RF Needle)" and the control device "needle, puncture, single-use (BRK Transseptal needle)", both of which are used for the transseptal puncture performed to enable left atrial access for the treatment of symptomatic arrhythmia and mitral stenosis, and then to demonstrate that the study device is non-inferior to the control device.
Interventions
DEVICETS-RF Transseptal Needle
Apply radiofrequency energy to the electrode tip via the TS-RF Generator and puncture the atrial septum
DEVICEBRK Transseptal Needle
Cross and puncture the atrial septum with the BRK Transseptal Needle
Sponsors
Starmed
Helptrial
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
1. ≥ 18 years of age 2. Diagnosed with one of the following cardiac disorders as shown in the medical record: \[Symptomatic arrhythmia\] * "Atrial fibrillation" diagnostics (including paroxysmal, persistent, long-standing persistent and permanent atrial fibrillation) * Diagnostic criteria: atrial fibrillation lasting ≥ 30 seconds as a result of standard 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) or single-lead ECG * ECG feature: irregular R-R interval, lack of visible P waves, irregular atrial activation * Symptoms: fatigue, palpitation, dyspnea, chest discomfort, sleep disorders, mental stress * Type: * Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (stopping within 48 hours without any treatment; restoring the sinus rhythm with cardioversion within 7 days) * Persistent atrial fibrillation (persisting for ≥ 7 days; including sinus rhythm restoration with direct-current cardioversion (DCC) or pharmacological cardioversion after the persistence) * Long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation (persisting for ≥ 1 year; including cases requiring cardioversion) * Permanent atrial fibrillation (The patient and healthcare provider accept atrial fibrillation and do not consider cardioversion; if cardioversion is considered, the atrial fibrillation is reclassified as long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation) * "Paroxysmal Supraventricular Tachycardia" diagnostics = Clinical feature: The heart beats regularly 150 to 200 times per minute; the start and end of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia are clearly recognizable; these occur unexpectedly and stop abruptly. * "Ectopic Atrial Rhythm Tachycardia" diagnostics = Clinical feature: Heart rhythm of less than 250 beats per minute; morphologic difference from P waves in the sinus rhythm; P waves that precede QRS waves are identifiable. * "Ventricular Tachycardia" diagnostics = Clinical feature: Wide QRS waves appear in succession with a rapid ventricular rate of ≥ 100 beats per minute; the patients is diagnosed with persistent ventricular tachycardia if tachycardia persists for ≥ 30 seconds but with non-persistent ventricular tachycardia if not applicable. * "Arrhythmia requiring left atrial access, including left atrial appendage occlusion, in the left atrium" diagnostics = Clinical feature: moderate or higher risk of stroke, risk of bleeding, or contraindication to anticoagulation therapy \[Symptomatic mitral stenosis\] -"Mitral Stenosis requiring percutaneous mitral valvuloplasty through left atrial access" diagnostics * Diagnostic criteria: confirmation of mitral stenosis with echocardiography and assessment of severity * Symptoms: dyspnea; shortness of breath even at rest or inability to sleep in a supine position if dyspnea worsens; may accompanied by coughing, sputum, and chest pain. 3. Understood this clinical study and voluntarily signed the informed consent form (ICF)1
Exclusion criteria
\[For symptomatic arrhythmia and mitral stenosis\] If any of the following applies, you cannot participate in this clinical trial.1,26,37,45,46 1. Patients with significant congenital heart defects, such as atrial septal defect or pulmonary vein (PV) abnormalities (excluding patent foramen ovale (PFO)). 2. Thrombus in the left atrium 3. Atrial fibrillation to reversible causes (e.g. hyperthyroidism, thoracic surgery) 4. Known or suspected left atrial myxoma. 5. Unstable angina. 6. Pre-existing hemidiaphragmatic paralysis 7. Contraindication to anticoagulation or radiocontrast materials 8. liver disease (including active hepatitis) and kidney disease. 9. Cerebral ischemic event (strokes or TIAs) during the six-month interval preceding the consent date 10. Malignant tumors or hematological diseases or life expectancy of less than one (1) year. 11. Currently participating or anticipated to participate in any other clinical trial of a drug, device or biologic that has the potential to interfere with the results of this study 12. Unwilling or unable to comply fully with study procedures and follow-up 13. A pregnant woman, a woman planning on becoming pregnant, or a lactating woman. 14. Ineligible for study participation in the judgment of the investigator.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| First-pass TSP Success Rate (percent) | Day of procedure | Probability that the needle crosses from the superior vena cava to the fossa ovalis and its left atrial access is identified at a time by fluoroscopy, transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), or intracardiac echocardiography (ICE). |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| TSP Time (Second) | Day of procedure | Time from the point where the needle crosses from the superior vena cava to the fossa ovalis to the point where its left atrial access is identified by fluoroscopy, transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), or intracardiac echocardiography (ICE). |
| Fluoroscopy Time (Second) for TSP | Day of procedure | Time from the point where invasive vascular monitoring is initiated with fluoroscopy following the femoral venous puncture and then the needle inserted into the femoral vein is visible on the fluoroscope's fluorescent screen to the point where the needle tip's left atrial access after TSP is identified. |
| Needle cross-over between the study and control groups | Day of procedure | Perform TSP by switching the needle from the BRK needle in the control group to the TS-RF needle in the study group, or from the TS-RF needle in the study group to the BRK needle in the control group. Collect the data based on the recorded videos and procedure record sheets. (Number of subjects who switched needles and percentage in each group) |
| Intra-TSP procedural device-associated complications | Day of procedure | Collect and total the numbers of intra-TSP procedural device-associated complications for each group based on the procedure record sheets and then calculate and compare the group-specific incidence rates (percent). |
| Changes in patient's quality of life | before the procedure (baseline) and at 2 weeks after the procedure. | Check the improvement in patient's quality of life by measuring the degree of discomfort due to symptomatic arrhythmia or mitral stenosis before the procedure (baseline) and at 2 weeks after the procedure. Calculate and compare group-specific mean changes in EQ-5D-5L and EQ-VAS before the procedure (baseline) and at the follow-up visit 2 weeks after the procedure. It consists of 5 multiple-choice questions asking about current health status and 1 question (visual analogue scale, VAS) that displays subjective health level (0 to 100 points) in the form of a thermometer. |
| Complications | for 2 weeks after the procedure | Check the complications collected during the hospitalization period within 7 days immediately after the procedure and at the follow-up visit 2 weeks after the procedure, including the following two durations:. * From the end of TSP to the end of hospitalization within 7 days thereafter * From the discharge to the follow-up visit at 2 weeks after TSP |
Countries
South Korea
Contacts
CONTACTEunji shin
STUDY_CHAIRSang-Weon Park, MD, Ph.D
Sejong General Hospital
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORJong-Il Choi, MD, Ph.D
Korea University Anam Hospital
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORJae-Sun Uhm, MD, Ph.D
Severance Hospital
Outcome results
None listed