Skip to content

Comparison of Using Collagen Membrane and A-PRF Using VISTA Technique in Gingival Recession Treatment

Comparative Evaluation of Vestibular Incision Subperiosteal Tunnel Access With Advanced Platelet-rich Fibrin and Collagen Membrane in the Treatment of Gingival Recession Defects

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06357351
Enrollment
24
Registered
2024-04-10
Start date
2022-07-01
Completion date
2024-05-31
Last updated
2024-04-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Gingival Recession

Brief summary

To assess the efficacy of minimally invasive Vestibular Incision Subperiosteal Tunnel Access (VISTA) with collagen membrane and Advanced Platelet-rich Fibrin (A-PRF) in the treatment of multiple buccal gingival recession type 1(RT1) Cairo Classification.

Interventions

PROCEDUREvestibular incision sub periosteal tunnel access ( VISTA) technique.

In comparison between the two groups, the first group uses collagen membrane and the other group uses advanced PRF using the same surgical technique (VISTA)

Sponsors

Mansoura University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* (18-50) years old with at least 2 sites with gingival recession type (RT1) Cairo Classification (GR with no interdental attachment loss). The interdental CEJ is not detectable clinically on the labial surfaces of the teeth. * Recession in the maxillary anterior region ≥1 mm of attached gingiva, pocket depth (PD) of \<3 mm, recession depth (RD) ≥2 mm, and gingival index (GI) score ≤1. * Systemically healthy, willing individuals with good oral hygiene and without contraindications for surgical interventions

Exclusion criteria

* the presence of severe systematic diseases or immunodeficiency and contraindicated with surgical interventions. * Allergies to medicaments used in the treatment process. * Patients with removable or fixed dentures. * Patients with cervical abrasion, direct and indirect restorations involving the cervical areas of the maxillary anterior. * Participants with smoking, tobacco chewing, and alcohol consumption. * The presence of high frenal attachment and participants who had previously undergone any periodontal surgical procedure or regenerative therapy in the past 1 year at the same site of the planned treatment.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean of root coveragebaseline, and 6 monthswas measured by the following formula:. Mean root coverage formula: (pre-operative recession depth - post-operative recession depth)/(pre-operative recession depth ) ×100
Measuring the recession width in millimeterbaseline, 3 months and 6 monthsself-report assessment by using the UNC-15 Periodontal Probe, measured at the level of Cemento-Enamel Junction CEJ.
Measuring the recession depth in millimeterbaseline, 3 months and 6 monthsself-report assessment by using the UNC-15 Periodontal Probe, measured from the cemento-enamel junction CEJ to the free gingival junction.
Measuring the width of keratinized gingiva in millimeterbaseline, 3 months and 6 monthsself-report assessment by using the UNC-15 Periodontal Probe. measured from the free gingiva margin to the mucogingival junction.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Measuring the probing depthbaseline, 3 months and 6 monthsself-report assessment by using the UNC-15 Periodontal Probe. Measured from the free gingival margin to the base of the sulcus.
Measuring the plaque indexbaseline, 3 months and 6 monthsAccording to Silness and Leo, this index determines the thickness of the plaque along the gingival margin. possible score range from 0 (no plaque) to 1 ( thin plaque located at gingival margin only detected by periodontal probe), 2 ( moderate plaque thickness detected by naked eye located at gingival margin), and 3 ( abundant plaque thickness at gingival margin and interproximal area)
Measuring the gingival indexbaseline, 3 months and 6 monthsAccording to Silness and Leo, this index determines the description of the gingiva of examined teeth. possible score range from 0 (normal gingiva) to 1 (mild inflammation; slight erythema; no bleeding.) / 2 (moderate inflammation; erythema and bleeding on probing) or 3 (severe inflammation; severe erythema, swelling, and spontaneous bleeding).
Clinical attachment levelbaseline, 3 months and 6 monthsself-report assessment by using the UNC-15 Periodontal Probe, measured from the cemento-enamel junction to the base of the pocket.

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 6, 2026