Skip to content

Cycling and Treadmill With Dual Task for Parkinson's Disease Improvement

Cycling Induced Motor Cortex Plasticity and Functional Improvement -the Dual Task Evaluation Model for Parkinson Disease

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06355947
Enrollment
50
Registered
2024-04-10
Start date
2015-12-07
Completion date
2018-07-31
Last updated
2024-04-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Parkinson Disease(PD)

Keywords

Gait, Cycling training, Treadmill training, Dual-task walking, Dual-task cycling

Brief summary

Motor impairment in lower extremities is common in individuals with Parkinson disease (PD). Development sensitive test for early motor deviations is important. Conventional walking test cannot induce the PD related motor impairments, such as freezing of gait. Therefore, finding a safe substitute test to induce PD related motor impairments is important. Studies showed that working memory related dual task walking was a sensitive test for PD. However, the optimal cognitive test needs to be clarified. Studies also showed that the neuromuscular control mechanism of leg movements during cycling were similar to those during walking. Therefore, dual task cycling test is potential to be a safe and sensitive testing model. Studies showed that exercise could improve cognitive function and induce brain plasticity. Dual task exercise training was shown to be more effective than single task exercise training for older people to prevent fall. Whether the added cognitive task could improve to detriment brain plasticity in PD should be investigated. Transcranial magnetic stimulation can evaluate the motor cortex plasticity on-invasively and can evaluate the exercise induced brain plasticity. The purpose of this three-year project is to develop PD-sensitive. The purposes of the first year are to translate the dual task walking test to dual task cycling test, and to establish the reliability of the dual task cycling test. The purposes of the second year are to compare the motor cortex plasticity induced by single task cycling versus dual task cycling and to compare the difference response between PD and healthy control people. The purpose of the third year is to evaluate the effect of 8 week long term cycling training or treadmill training of individuals with PD on motor cortex plasticity, dual task performance, and ambulation ability.

Interventions

OTHERCognitive cycling training

Cycling training conducted with cognitive tasks

OTHERCognitive treadmill training

Treadmill training conducted with cognitive tasks

Sponsors

Chang Gung University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Health subjects:

Exclusion criteria

* Musculoskeletal injuries on legs. * Osteoporosis. PD subjects: Inclusion Criteria: \- Clinical diagnosis of Parkinson disease.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Reaction TimeBaseline, 4 weeks and 8 weeks.The duration between the onset of task start time and the participant's response to it, typically expressed in second (s).
Balance PerformanceBaseline, 4 weeks and 8 weeksMeasured by the duration the stance can be maintained, typically expressed second.
Walking SpeedBaseline, 4 weeks and 8 weeksThe time taken by participants to walk a standardized distance, typically expressed in centimeters per second (cm/s).
Step LengthBaseline, 4 weeks and 8 weeksThe linear distance between the two ankles, typically expressed in centimeters(cm).
Step TimeBaseline, 4 weeks and 8 weeksThe duration taken for one complete step, measuring from foot-off of one foot to the next foot-off of the same foot, usually expressed in seconds.
Power Spectral Density (PSD)Baseline, 4 weeks and 8 weeks.Quantifies the power of EEG signals within specific frequency bands (e.g., delta, theta, alpha, beta, and gamma) over a period.
Task AccuracyBaseline, 4 weeks and 8 weeks.The percentage of correct responses or actions made by participants in response to walking or cycling tasks.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Single Support TimeBaseline, 4 weeks and 8 weeksThe duration within the gait cycle when only one foot is in contact with the ground, typically measured in seconds or as a percentage of the total gait cycle.
Swing TimeBaseline, 4 weeks and 8 weeksThe portion of the gait cycle where the foot is not in contact with the ground, moving forward to the next step. It is usually expressed as a percentage of the total gait cycle or in seconds.
Stance TimeBaseline, 4 weeks and 8 weeksThe portion of the gait cycle when the foot is in contact with the ground, supporting body weight. It's typically expressed as a percentage of the total gait cycle or in seconds
CadenceBaseline, 4 weeks and 8 weeksThe number of steps an individual takes per minute, providing an overview of gait speed and rhythm, , expressed as steps per minute.
Heart rateBaselineThe number of heartbeats per minute on resting, walking or cycling tasks.
Double Support TimeBaseline, 4 weeks and 8 weeksThe portion of the gait cycle where both feet are in contact with the ground, indicating the transition phase between steps, expressed as a percentage of the gait cycle or in seconds.

Countries

Taiwan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026