Skip to content

Human vs Machine: a RCT Comparing Traditional In-person Instruction, AI Versus VR for Learning Basic CCE

Human vs Machine: a Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing Traditional In-person Instruction, Artificial Intelligence Versus Virtual Reality for Learning Basic Critical Care Echocardiography

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06355557
Enrollment
66
Registered
2024-04-09
Start date
2024-04-04
Completion date
2025-01-31
Last updated
2024-04-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Ultrasound

Keywords

artificial intelligence, echocardiography, POCUS

Brief summary

The aim of the study is to investigate if hands-on training for basic CCE with virtual reality simulators or guided by artificial intelligence is non-inferior to training by an experienced instructor.

Detailed description

Basic (Level 1) Critical care echocardiography (CCE) involves using an ultrasound device to qualitatively assess the heart at the bedside. It is increasingly being used at the bedside for diagnostics and screening of key differential diagnoses. Increasingly, CCE is being taught to more medical staff from many fields in medicine, including emergency medicine, anaesthesiology, intensive care medicine and even family medicine. There is a wealth of learning resources online but access to direct supervision by trainers and in-person courses is can be limited and costly. At the time of the study, one local medical school incorporated a lecture there is no credentialling pathway within local medical schools or institution. There has been increasing use of machine learning in medical imaging and deep learning algorithms are now able to guide image acquisition and allow novices with minimal training in echocardiography to obtain diagnostic-quality images. Artificial intelligence (AI) in echocardiography may improve image by novices. Ultrasound hardware that implement machine learning software in real-time can help with structure detection and identification, but more studies are needed to determine the extent that AI impacts learning.

Interventions

OTHERAI enabled ultrasound system for self-directed learning

use of the AI enabled ultrasound system for self-directed learning

OTHERSimulator for self-directed learning

use of the simulator for self-directed learning

OTHERtraditional with human instructors

Medical students who are randomised to this arm

Sponsors

Tan Tock Seng Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
DOUBLE (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

3-arm prospective randomised controlled trial.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Medical students will have limited clinical exposure to critical care echocardiography * above the age of 21 years

Exclusion criteria

* prior attendance of a critical care echocardiography courses or * refusal to participate in the study or complete both hands on sessions

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Improvement in image acquisition and structure identification at the end of 3 months.3 monthsThe images acquired during that timeframe will be scored using the validated Rapid Assessment of Competency in Echocardiography Scale. The experienced CCE trainer who will score the subject will be blinded to which arm of the study the subject is in

Countries

Singapore

Contacts

Primary ContactYie H Lau
yie_hui_lau@ttsh.com.sg6563577771

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026