Dental Caries, Tooth Decay
Conditions
Brief summary
The purpose of this research study is to test the effectiveness of two different crowns/caps on teeth for restoration of primary molar teeth. The two different materials of crowns are resin polymer and stainless steel crowns. These crowns are placed on the teeth to restore function and prevent further caries and infection.
Detailed description
There is a lack of literary evidence for assessment of the properties of Bioflx crowns and their effect on clinical outcomes and parental satisfaction compared to traditionally available options including stainless steel crowns and zirconia crowns. Hence, this study plans to assess the clinical performance and child and parental satisfaction of Bioflx compared to the gold standard stainless steel crowns in pediatric patients.
Interventions
OTHERResin polymer (NuSmile Bioflx) crown
Resin polymer (NuSmile Bioflx)crown
Stainless steel crown
Sponsors
Virginia Commonwealth University
Study design
Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Intervention model description
Each participant will receive both interventions.
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
3 Years to 7 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Age: Children age group 3-7 yrs old * Primary molars affected with caries or hypoplastic defect. * Occlusion: Primary molar must have antagonist tooth. * Consent of parent (legal guardians) and child assent for 7 years. * Multi-surface dental caries observed in more than one tooth, in either side of the same arch (maxilla or mandible) or opposite arch (maxilla or mandible) * Status: Asymptomatic or symptomatic teeth with signs of reversible pulpitis
Exclusion criteria
* Teeth with advanced stages of resorption (more than 2/3rd) * Teeth exhibiting irreversible pulpitis. * Teeth for which pulpotomy is done. * Molar in infraocclusion * Medically compromised children (ASA 3 or 4) * History of grinding or pathological attrition * Adverse gingival or periodontal conditions
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| The success of Bioflx crown in primary molars in comparisons with stainless steel molars through clinical assessments | 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 months | The clinical outcomes will be measured and reported in the data table based on the number of participants scored on 3-point Likert scale (Ideal, Acceptable, or Not Acceptable) for the following parameters separately: Contour of crown, gingival health, staining of crown, surface roughness of crown, opposing tooth, color match of crown, marginal fit, marginal discoloration, recurrent caries. |
| The success of Bioflx crown in primary molars in comparisons with stainless steel molars through radiographic assessments | 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 months | The radiographic outcomes will be measured and reported in the data table based on the number of participants scored on either presence or absence (yes / no) of the findings for the following parameter separately: Widening of periodontal ligament space, furcation radiolucency, periapical pathology, alveolar crestal bone loss, internal root resorption and external root resorption. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Parental satisfaction | 3, 12, 24 and 36 months | The questionnaire is a Likert scale of 1-5. 1 equals very dissatisfied. 5 equals very satisfied. The higher the score, the better. |
| Child satisfaction | 3, 12, 24 and 36 months | The questionnaire is a Likert scale of 1-5. 1 equals very dissatisfied. 5 equals very satisfied. The higher the score, the better. |
| ECOHIS (Early Childhood Oral Health Impact Scale) survey | Pre-operative, 6, 12, 24 and 36 months | The questionnaire is a Likert scale of 1-5. 1 equals never. 5 equals very often. The lower the score, the better. |
Countries
United States
Outcome results
None listed