Colorectal Neoplasms
Conditions
Keywords
Metaverse multi-dimensional rehabilitation platform
Brief summary
The investigators evaluated and optimized the Metaverse multi-dimensional rehabilitation platform based on the use of the Metaverse multi-dimensional rehabilitation platform by colorectal cancer survivors and their families, and finally launched the Metaverse multi-dimensional rehabilitation platform.
Detailed description
The investigatorse intend to invite colorectal cancer survivors and their families to use the metaverse multi-dimensional rehabilitation platform. Interviews with users, user experience optimization of the metaverse multi-dimensional rehabilitation platform, and then evaluation of the platform through system usability evaluation. Gain insight into the experience of colorectal cancer survivors using the metaverse multi-dimensional rehabilitation platform, and understand their opinions and suggestions to explore the usability of the metaverse multi-dimensional rehabilitation platform.
Interventions
Using the multidimensional rehabilitation space in the metaverse, evaluate the platform after use.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Patients undergoing adjuvant therapy after radical colorectal cancer resection; Age over 18 years old, under 65 years old, non-pregnant; Volunteering to participate in the research of this topic; Mobile phones are available
Exclusion criteria
* Patients with multiple cancers; Have special dietary needs.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Post-Study System Usability Questionnaire (PSSUQ) Third Edition | 4th week | The questionnaire includes three dimensions: usefulness, information quality, interface quality, and one overall evaluation item, totaling 20 items. Each item is rated on a scale from 'strongly disagree' to 'strongly agree' with scores ranging from 1 to 5. A higher score indicates higher user satisfaction. |
| System Usability Scale (SUS) | 4th week | Used to evaluate user experience, employing the Likert 5-point scale method, consisting of 10 questions. Questions 1, 3, 5, 7, and 9 are positively worded, while questions 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 are negatively worded. The validity of the scale is 0.85. The SUS is scored on a percentage scale. When the questionnaire score is above 70, the product is considered 'good,' and above 50 is considered 'okay. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Semi-structured interview | 4th week | Through interviews, conducting interviews with colorectal cancer patients on the theme of 'platform implementation effectiveness' to understand the evaluation of colorectal cancer patients on this mobile healthcare platform. |
Countries
China