Skip to content

Efficacy of Different Treatments for Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Efficacy of Different Treatment Modalities for Obstructive Sleep Apnea: a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06352658
Enrollment
45
Registered
2024-04-08
Start date
2023-02-01
Completion date
2024-01-10
Last updated
2025-01-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Apnea

Brief summary

This was a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial that aimed to evaluate the efficacy of three treatments for obstructive sleep Apnea OSA: 1. Conventionally constructed mandibular advancement device (MAD). 2. Digitally constructed mandibular advancement device (CAD CAM). 3. Uvulopalatopharyngeoplasty (UPPP).

Interventions

DEVICEConventional mandibular advancement device

With a vacuum mahine (Biostar, NY) a 2-mm-thick hard, clear resin sheet was adapted to the cast. The excess material was cut, borders were trimmed and smoothed. Maxillary mandibular casts were mounted by a protrusive the interocclusal record. The appliances were re-placed on the mounted casts to be splinted to form a Monoblock MAD by autopolymerizing acrylic resin at the premolar -molar area.

DEVICECAD CAM mandibular advancement device

3D models for the stone casts were constructed with laser scanning machine (accuracy \<20 µm; D500, 3shape). Maxillary and mandibular casts were rescanned in the achieved 75% advancement position and monoblock device was designed by CAD (computer-aided design) with 3D software (3-matic; Materialise) and printed by

PROCEDUREUvuloplatopharyngeoplasty UPPP

uvulopalatopharyngeoplasty UPPP were performed by the same ENT surgeon under GA.

Sponsors

Nourhan M.Aly
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
30 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adequate nasal air flow capacity as determined by qualified otolaryngologist * Cases showing improvement in airway with mandibular advancement on Acoustic Pharyngometry (AP) * Patients with the minimum component of dentition to support MDSA. * Patients with the mandibular protrusive movement of more than 5 mm * Body mass index (BMI) less than 30 kg/m2

Exclusion criteria

* Severe nasal passage obstructions or allergies * Obesity (BMI greater than 30 kg/m2 ) * Cases with Mallampati score greater than Class 1 * Systemic complications, syndrome, or disease affecting airway * Severe periodontal disease

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Apnea hypopnea index4 monthsThe AHI measures an average number of apnea and hypopnea episodes that you experience per hour. According to the American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM) it is categorized into mild (5-15 events/hour), moderate (15-30 events/hr), and severe (\> 30 events/hr)
Epwoth sleeplness scale (ESS)4 monthsThe ESS is a subjective measure of a patient's sleepiness. The test is a list of eight situations in which the patien rates their tendency to become sleepy on a scale of 0, no chance of dozing, to 3, high chance of dozing. All scores on the ESS fall between 0 and 24. Scores from 0 to 10 reflect normal levels of daytime sleepiness, and scores over 10 are considered to reflect excessive daytime sleepiness.
Oxygen saturation4 monthsThis will be measured using an oximeter. A normal level of oxygen is usually 95% or higher.
Snoring index4 monthsSnoring index measures the total number of snores per hour of sleep. This is calculated by dividing your total sleeping time by your snoring frequency. The normal range depends on the person's gender and the stage of sleep

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026