Skip to content

Effect of the Autonomic Nervous System on the Outcomes of PULSEd Field Ablation to Treat Atrial Fibrillation

Effect of the Autonomic Nervous System on the Outcomes of PULSEd Field Ablation to Treat Atrial Fibrillation (EASy-PULSE AF)

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06351553
Acronym
EASy-PULSE AF
Enrollment
156
Registered
2024-04-08
Start date
2024-06-30
Completion date
2026-06-30
Last updated
2024-04-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Atrial Fibrillation

Keywords

Atrial Fibrillation, Pulmonary Vein Isolation, Pulsed Field Ablation

Brief summary

Pulmonary vein (PV) isolation is considered the therapeutic strategy of choice to maintain sinus rhythm (SR) in symptomatic patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). The most commonly used energy modality is radiofrequency (RF). However, this type of energy presents notable challenges, such as its lack of selectivity for myocardial tissue, which increases the risk of serious complications such as atrioesophageal fistula, PV stenosis, and vagus nerve injuries. In this context, PV isolation using pulsed field ablation (PFA) emerges as a promising alternative due to its greater myocardial selectivity. However, this selectivity presents additional challenges. Preliminary studies indicate that PFA may not damage the autonomic nervous system (ANS) involved in the initiation and maintenance of AF in certain patients, although stronger evidence is needed to support this claim. The investigators propose to carry out a single-center clinical trial, although with the possibility in the future of including other centers. Patients will be randomized to three research groups: PV isolation with RF, PV isolation with PFA, and PV isolation combining PFA and RF (using RF on the anterior wall and PFA on the posterior wall). This assignment will be open to the operator who performs the procedure, but blind for the researcher responsible for monitoring and for the data analyst. The objective is to compare the impact of different energy sources during PV isolation on the ability to produce a permanent alteration in the ANS. The hypothesis is that combined PF isolation will be capable of producing a permanent alteration of autonomic function parameters superior to ablation using exclusive PFA.

Interventions

PROCEDUREPulmonary vein isolation exclusively with radiofrequency

The QDOT (Biosense Webster, Inc.) or TactiFlex (Abbott S.E.) catheters will be used. The ablation will be controlled by temperature, with a limit of 42ºC and a power target of 30-40W. A high-power strategy (90 W/4 seconds) can be used on the posterior wall when the QDOT catheter is used.

PROCEDUREPulmonary vein isolation exclusively with pulsed field ablation

The Sphere-9 catheter will be used (with biphasic and unipolar wave), with a duration per application of 5 seconds and a separation between lesions of 5-6mm. The target temperature increase will be at least 1.5ºC above the patient's basal temperature to mark the ablation as effective.

PROCEDURECombined pulmonary vein isolation

The Sphere-9 catheter will be used for both radiofrequency and pulsed field ablation. When using radiofrequency, the ablation will be temperature controlled, with a target temperature of 73ºC. The duration per application will be 5 seconds. Catheter irrigation during ablation will be 30ml/min, with a maximum current intensity of 3700mA, and a maximum current density of 13.6mA/mm2. The separation between lesions will be 7-8mm. Regarding pulsed field ablation, the characteristics will be those indicated in Pulmonary vein isolation exclusively with pulsed field ablation group.

Sponsors

Hospital General Universitario de Alicante
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

\- Patients with a diagnosis of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, referred to our center for pulmonary vein isolation, who are willing and able to sign the informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with permanent atrial fibrillation. * Patients with previous pulmonary vein isolation procedure. * Patients with pacemakers, or with a diagnosis of atrioventricular block or sinus dysfunction. * Patients who show their refusal to participate in the registry, or are unable to understand the informed consent. * Patients under 18 years of age. * Pregnant.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Efficacy primary outcome: Alteration of autonomic function parametersTwo yearsDetermine if combined pulmonary vein isolation (anterior wall ablation with radiofrequency and posterior wall ablation with pulsed field ablation) will be capable of producing a permanent alteration of autonomic function parameters (average heart rate) greater than exclusive pulsed field ablation.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Efficacy secondary outcome: Alteration of autonomic function parametersTwo yearsDetermine if combined pulmonary vein isolation (anterior wall ablation with radiofrequency and posterior wall ablation with pulsed field ablation) will be capable of producing a permanent alteration of autonomic function parameters (attenuation of heart rate variability) greater than exclusive pulsed field ablation.
Efficacy secondary outcome: Procedure duration.Two yearsDetermine if combined pulmonary vein isolation or exclusive pulmonary vein isolation with pulsed field ablation will shorten procedure times compared to exclusive radiofrequency pulmonary vein isolation.

Countries

Spain

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026