Skip to content

Effects of Prefabricated Foot Orthoses With and Without Metatarsal Pads on Central Metatarsalgia

Effects of Prefabricated Foot Orthoses With and Without Metatarsal Pads in People With Central Metatarsalgia: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06350435
Enrollment
32
Registered
2024-04-05
Start date
2024-01-26
Completion date
2024-04-18
Last updated
2024-07-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Metatarsalgia

Brief summary

Compare the effects of prefabricated foot orthoses with and without metatarsal pads on pain intensity in the 2nd to 4th metatarsophalangeal joints, foot and ankle functional abilities as well as the occurrence of plantar callosities among patients with central metatarsalgia.

Detailed description

Metatarsalgia is a common condition that affecting about 10% of the general population. Central metatarsalgia involves pathology of the 2nd to 4th metatarsal and their respective metatarsophalangeal joints. This randomized control trial is designed to compare the effects of prefabricated foot orthoses with and without metatarsal pads on pain intensity, foot and ankle functional abilities as well as the occurrence of plantar callosities.

Interventions

DEVICEPrefabricated foot orthoses (PFO) with metatarsal pads

A pair of prefabricated foot orthoses, each with a metatarsal pad to be affixed underneath

DEVICEPrefabricated foot orthoses (PFO) without metatarsal pads

A pair of prefabricated foot orthoses only

Sponsors

Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Chinese University of Hong Kong
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Age ≥ 18 years; * Complain of foot pain on the 2nd to 4th MTPJs during walking in shoes, rating the pain intensity as ≥ 50mm on the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS); * Able to be ambulant

Exclusion criteria

* Peripheral vascular disease (PVD) * Neurological dysfunctions or neuromuscular disorders * Active infection, i.e., cellulitis, osteomyelitis, shingles * Cognitive impairment * History of lower limb surgery and currently undergoing rehabilitation * Active ulceration on foot and ankle * Current utilization of prescribed insoles

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain intensity at the 2nd to 4th metatarsophalangeal joints during walking in shoes on Visual Analogue ScaleBaseline, a follow-up at 4-8 weeks from baselineVAS consists of a 100mm-long uninterrupted horizontal line, with 2 verbal description at each end. A score of 0mm represents no pain while 100 mm represents the worst imaginable pain.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS)Baseline, a follow-up at 4-8 weeks from baselineFAOS consists of 42 questions, which are categorized into 5 subdomains: symptoms, pain, activities of daily living, sports and quality of life. Each question id rated on a 5-point Likert scale, ranging from 0 to 4 and subsequently transformed into a normalized score between 0 and 100. A score of 100 indicates absence of symptoms, while a score of 0 indicates the presence of severe symptoms.
Size of callosities and corns on the plantar area of the 2nd to 4th metatarsophalangeal jointsBaseline, a follow-up at 4-8 weeks from baseline

Countries

Hong Kong

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026