Skip to content

Clinical Performance of Fiber Reinforced FRC Base and Bonded CAD/CAM Resin Composite Endocrowns

Clinical Performance of Fiber Reinforced FRC Base and Bonded CAD/CAM Resin Composite Endocrowns Versus Conventional Lithium Disilicate Endocrowns in Posterior Teeth (1y Randomized Clinical Trial)

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06348979
Enrollment
110
Registered
2024-04-05
Start date
2022-01-01
Completion date
2024-01-30
Last updated
2024-04-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dental Caries

Keywords

restoration fracture, CAD/CAM resin composite endocrowns, lithium disilicate endocrowns

Brief summary

This research proposal is introduced to clinically test short fiber reinforced flowable resin composite material (everX Flow, GC Europe) as a supporting base under CAD/CAM resin composite endocrowns due to gap of knowledge present in this area.

Interventions

PROCEDUREFiber flowable (SFRC) support below hybrid nanoceramic endocrowns

restoration of endodontically treated teeth by endocrowns

PROCEDUREall ceramic Endocrowns (emax)

restoration of endodontically treated teeth by endocrowns

Sponsors

Cairo University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 38 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Endodontically treated molar teeth indicated for endocrown. * Presence of favorable occlusion and teeth are in normal alignment with the adjacent teeth, -medically free

Exclusion criteria

* ▪ Endodontically treated molar teeth indicated for post and core or only crown coverage. * Severe periodontal problems

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
clinical Fracturechange from baseline and months: 3, 6, 12modified usphs criteria (alpha, bravo, charlie) with measuring unit: scoring system (ordinal)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
clinical performance marginal adaptationchange from baseline and months: 3, 6, 12modified usphs criteria (alpha, bravo, charlie) with measuring unit:scoring system (ordinal)

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026