Skip to content

Totally Robotic Versus Surgeon-Assisted Robotic Lung Resection For Early-Stage NSCLC

Totally Robotic Versus Surgeon-Assisted Robotic Lung Resection For Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06348030
Enrollment
120
Registered
2024-04-04
Start date
2026-09-01
Completion date
2028-04-01
Last updated
2026-02-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Lung Cancer

Brief summary

Robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RTS) is safe and effective for patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). During RTS, division, dissection, and sealing of lung tissue, bronchi, and blood vessels can be performed using handheld staplers with assistance from a bedside surgeon (Surgeon-Assisted), or totally robotically with robotic staplers and energy devices by the console surgeon (Totally Robotic). Totally Robotic lung resection enables the operating surgeon to perform the case independently, but its implication on costs and patient outcomes remains unknown. There also is, however, a lack of prospective research evaluating the costs of the two methods for dissection and vessel sealing in RTS. This RCT aims to evaluate the costs and perioperative patient outcomes of Totally Robotic lung resection using the Vessel Sealer Extend energy device (for vessels \<7mm) and the SureForm robotic stapler (Intervention) versus Surgeon-Assisted robotic lung resection using the Signia stapler (Control) during RTS for NSCLC using the da Vinci system.

Interventions

The Signia Stapler is a powered stapler that can be used for tissue dissection and vessel sealing during surgery.

DEVICEVessel Sealer Extend Energy Device and SureForm Stapler

The Vessel Sealer Extend Energy Device is integrated with the da Vinci system and uses bipolar energy technology to facilitate tissue dissection and vessel sealing.

Sponsors

St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 120 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age between 18 and 120 years at time of consent * Ability to speak and understand English * Clinical stage I, II or IIIa NSCLC * Candidate for RTS, as determined by the operating surgeon

Exclusion criteria

* Anticoagulation with inability to cease anticoagulant therapy prior to surgery * Incurable coagulopathy * Systemic vascular disease or vasculitis * Not a candidate for RTS

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Costs of Totally Robotic versus Surgeon-Assisted Robotic Lung ResectionUp to 3 weeks following hospital dischargeSurgical device (stapler or energy) costs per surgery, along with inpatient hospitalization costs per day following surgery will be collected and evaluated in Canadian dollars.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Operating Room Time3 weeks post-surgeryEntry into Operating Room to Exit, in minutes
Length of Stay in Hospital3 weeks post-surgeryAdmission Date to Discharge Date, in days
Duration of Chest Tube3 weeks post-surgeryInsertion Date to Discharge Date, in days
Intraoperative Complications and Adverse events (AEs)3 weeks post-surgeryShort-term clinical outcomes, as measured by intraoperative complications and postoperative AEs, will be recorded during patient follow-ups.

Countries

Canada

Contacts

CONTACTYogita S Patel, BSc
patelys@mcmaster.ca905-522-1155
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORWaël C Hanna, MDCM, MBA, FRCSC

St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026