Skip to content

Supported Rescue Packs Post-discharge in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Supported Rescue Packs Post-discharge in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: An Open-label Multicenter Randomised Controlled Trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06347536
Acronym
RAPID
Enrollment
1400
Registered
2024-04-04
Start date
2025-01-30
Completion date
2027-12-31
Last updated
2025-02-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

COPD, COPD Exacerbation

Keywords

COPD, exacerbation, hospital admission, rescue packs, self-management support

Brief summary

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a chronic lung disease affecting approximately 10% of the adult population globally. COPD is recognised to be an important area of focus, as part of one of the healthcare challenges defined by the Office of Life Sciences. Patients with COPD often experience exacerbations which are triggered episodes leading to disease worsening. Exacerbations are associated with increased morbidity and a risk of mortality. Severe exacerbations, where patients are hospitalised, are of particular concern to patients, carers and healthcare givers. The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) recommends that hospital clinicians looking after patients with COPD should provide rescue packs (a course of prednisolone and antibiotics) and a basic management plan to patients on discharge. It is recognised that there is a high-risk 90-day period to patients with COPD following discharge from hospital, where there is a 43% risk of readmission and a 12% risk of mortality; however repeated national audit data has shown that, despite NICE recommendations this high risk of readmission and mortality has not changed. A multicentre randomised clinical trial of 1400 patients will be conducted in 30 acute NHS trusts. This will test the hypothesis that a self-supported rescue pack management plan consisting of rescue packs + written self-management plan + twice weekly telephone/text symptom alert assessments in the high-risk 90-day period is better than standard care in reducing 90-day readmission by 20%. If successful, this intervention would be rapidly implementable, improve patient clinical outcomes and have a cost saving of approximately £350 million per annum.

Detailed description

What is the problem being addressed? Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a common lung condition in the United Kingdom, with a prevalence of 4.5% in population ≥40 years and rising4. In addition to daily symptoms such as cough and breathlessness that limit physical activity, people living with COPD are prone to unpredictable deteriorations in their health called 'exacerbations'. Exacerbations are sometimes severe enough to lead to hospital admission and are often driven by infections. A systematic review of patient outcomes in COPD identified exacerbations, especially severe hospitalised exacerbations, as the aspect of COPD that patients found most difficult to live with. Prior to the pandemic there were around 115,000 admissions to hospital with COPD exacerbations per annum6 and admissions are now returning to that level. Exacerbations are more common in the winter with greater circulation of respiratory viruses, and thus the burden of hospitalised exacerbations contributes to winter National Health Service (NHS) bed pressures and cost to the NHS. The annual healthcare cost for people with moderate and severe exacerbation of COPD in England was estimated to be nearly £1 billion in 20227. A particular problem after a hospitalised COPD exacerbation is re-admission to hospital. The National Asthma and COPD Audit Programme (NACAP) has shown that the re-admission rate is 23% at 30 days and 43% at 90 days2. A systematic review conducted by the authors identified comorbidities, previous exacerbations and increased length of stay as risk factors for 30- and 90-day all-cause readmission5. There are many interventions that can reduce the risk of COPD exacerbations but these are incompletely effective8. There is also evidence to suggest that earlier intervention with standard exacerbation treatment of antibiotics and/or corticosteroids (called a 'rescue pack') can hasten recovery, with a lessened chance of hospital admission9. As part of standard NHS care2, patients with COPD should have a 'discharge bundle' implemented, although this is often poorly delivered and has not been definitively shown to impact outcomes (likely because the wrong outcomes were chosen, and the bundle was poorly implemented)10. The provision of rescue packs is not a standard component of discharge bundles but these are sometimes provided according to local service preference3. Additionally, in usual clinical practice, some patients will have been prescribed rescue packs from primary care (GP) or a community respiratory team (CRT) prior to being hospitalised with COPD. Furthermore, patients may or may not have access to rescue packs from the GP or the CRT after hospital discharge. Although rescue packs are part of NICE guidance2, the available evidence suggests they are not effective unless provided in the context of a more comprehensive management/education plan that supports patients in their appropriate use11. In practice this usually does not happen3, with evidence that a patient with COPD will receive variable or often no support; with some patients receiving rescue packs on demand without considering antimicrobial resistance, predictable side-effects from steroid overuse, or reviewing appropriateness. The investigators have pilot data that show receiving a rescue pack on hospital discharge is controversial as the hospital team is not, in general, the team that provides ongoing support to use these. There is thus recognised over- and under-use of rescue packs, associated harm from these medicines and variable provision. Providing a rescue pack, with education on how to use and support for when to use, has not been specifically tested in the high-risk 90-day period for readmission following a hospitalised exacerbation. It is the investigators' hypothesis that rescue packs on discharge in addition to a comprehensive self-supported management plan, consisting of the Asthma+Lung UK written management plan and twice weekly automated phone and or text messaging during this 90 day high risk period, will reduce readmissions by 20% compared to standard care. Why is this research important in terms of improving the health of patients and health and care services? Reducing re-admission through provision of supported rescue pack use would benefit people living with COPD and the NHS. A reduction in readmissions of 20% could save the NHS £86 million per quarter (£344 million per annum). Conversely, demonstrating that rescue packs are not effective when used in this way will address controversy about use, and reduce pressure on antimicrobial resistance and harm from over-use of oral corticosteroids. Integrated care systems are rapidly developing out-of-hospital support for people with exacerbations of COPD including digitally supported virtual wards. The proposed trial will define the role of supported rescue pack provision in the design and implementation of these programmes, enhancing their ability to reduce demands on urgent and acute care. Whether positive or negative, this trial will help to reduce the current variation in service provision by providing a definitive answer to the study question. Furthermore, preventing exacerbations of COPD have been identified as a priority by the James Lind Alliance (JLA) Priority Setting Partnership (PSP)12.

Interventions

COMBINATION_PRODUCTSupported rescue pack

1\) a rescue pack (prednisolone and antibiotics for 5 days); 2) a written rescue pack management plan based on the Asthma-Lung UK plan; and 3) twice-weekly automated telephone symptom reminder calls for 90 days (with preferred language as needed). The reminder phone calls (to home telephone or mobile) will ask questions aligned to the written management plan

Sponsors

King's College London
CollaboratorOTHER
University College, London
CollaboratorOTHER
Imperial College London
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Cambridge
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Southampton
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Nottingham
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Leicester
CollaboratorOTHER
Frimley Health NHS Foundation Trust
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Newcastle University
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Bristol
CollaboratorOTHER
Asthma and Lung UK
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age ≥ 40 years * Individuals admitted to hospital with COPD exacerbation who have recently been discharged (discharged from ongoing support from secondary care team which includes hospital and virtual wards). Admission is defined as an episode in which a patient with an exacerbation of COPD is admitted to a ward and has stayed in hospital for 4 hours or more, including Emergency Medicine Centres, Medical Admission Units, Clinical Decision Units, short stay wards or similar but excludes patients treated transiently before being discharged from Emergency Department. * Ability to provide written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Individuals who require invasive ventilation during the hospital admission * Patients who have an expected survival of less than 90 days * Patients with signs of new consolidation on chest X-ray (if available). * Individuals who have been discharged to a residential or nursing home to residential or nursing home. * Individuals who are unable to manage a supported self-management plan. * Individuals with no access to telephone. * Individuals who are already taking part in an interventional trial. * Previous participation in the RAPID trial.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time to first all-cause readmission within 90 days of dischargeDay 90Time to first all-cause readmission within 90 days of discharge.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Cumulative systemic oral corticosteroids use over 90 daysDay 90Cumulative systemic oral corticosteroids use over 90 days post index discharge.
Cumulative systemic antibiotic use over 90 daysDay 90Cumulative systemic antibiotic use over 90 days post index discharge
Number of health care contacts at baseline, day 90Day 90Number of health care contacts at baseline, day 90 post index discharge
Number of health care contacts at baseline, day 180Day 180Number of health care contacts at baseline, day 180 post index discharge
Time to and frequency of COPD-related readmissions at 30 daysDay 30Time to and frequency of COPD-related readmissions at 30 days post index discharge.
Time to and frequency of COPD-related readmissions at 90 daysDay 90Time to and frequency of COPD-related readmissions at 90 days post index discharge.
Days alive and out of hospital at day 90Day 90Days alive and out of hospital at day 90 post index discharge.
Time to and frequency of all COPD exacerbations at day 30Day 30Time to and frequency of all COPD exacerbations at day 30 post index discharge.
Number of health care contacts at baseline and 1 yearMonth 12Number of health care contacts at baseline, and 1 year post index discharge
All cause readmission at 30 days30 daysAll cause readmission at 30 days post index discharge
All cause-, cardiovascular- and COPD- related mortality at day 90Day 90All cause-, cardiovascular- and COPD- related mortality at day 90 post index discharge
All cause-, cardiovascular- and COPD- related mortality over 12 monthsMonth 12All cause-, cardiovascular- and COPD- related mortality over 12 months post index discharge
Time to and frequency of all COPD exacerbations at day 90Day 90Time to and frequency of all COPD exacerbations at day 90 post index discharge.
EQ-5D-5L Health questionnaire (quality of life) at day 90Day 90EQ-5D-5L Health Questionnaire score (quality of life) is used to ascertain participants' quality of life as reflected by their capacity for mobility, self care, usual activities, pain or discomfort, anxiety and depression. Mobility self care and usual activities components are graded from no problems to unable to perform (from best outcome to worst outcome respectively). Pain, anxiety and depression are graded on the scale from none to extreme (from best outcome to worst outcome respectively).
EQ-5D-5L Health questionnaire (quality of life) at day 180Day 180EQ-5D-5L Health Questionnaire score (quality of life) is used to ascertain participants' quality of life as reflected by their capacity for mobility, self care, usual activities, pain or discomfort, anxiety and depression. Mobility self care and usual activities components are graded from no problems to unable to perform (from best outcome to worst outcome respectively). Pain, anxiety and depression are graded on the scale from none to extreme (from best outcome to worst outcome respectively).
Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER, a ratio of the additional cost divided by the additional effectiveness of SRP compared to UC) at day 90Day 90Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER, a ratio of the additional cost divided by the additional effectiveness of SRP compared to UC) at day 90
Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER, a ratio of the additional cost divided by the additional effectiveness of SRP compared to UC) at day 180Day 180Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER, a ratio of the additional cost divided by the additional effectiveness of SRP compared to UC) at day 180
Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER, a ratio of the additional cost divided by the additional effectiveness of SRP compared to UC) at 1 yearMonth 12Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER, a ratio of the additional cost divided by the additional effectiveness of SRP compared to UC) at 1 year
Qualitative interviews to examine and describe usual careDay 90Interviews will be conducted by telephone, will take up to approximately 60 minutes, and will be audio-recorded using an encrypted device. They will follow a topic guide focusing on the participant's experience of the post-discharge intervention, including their knowledge of the use of rescue packs, whether they used a rescue pack and in what circumstances, their views on the support and guidance provided (written, telephone, and text message), and the fit of the intervention into their day-to-day lives.
Qualitative interview examination of fidelity to and adaptation of the plan in the intervention armDay 90Interviews will be conducted by telephone, will take up to approximately 60 minutes, and will be audio-recorded using an encrypted device. They will follow a topic guide focusing on the participant's experience of the post-discharge intervention, including their knowledge of the use of rescue packs, whether they used a rescue pack and in what circumstances, their views on the support and guidance provided (written, telephone, and text message), and the fit of the intervention into their day-to-day lives
Serious adverse eventsThrough study completion, average of 4 yearsSerious adverse events
Presence of bacterial resistance to antimicrobial agentsThrough study completion, average of 4 yearsProportion of isolates resistant to common antibiotics. This will be assessed via routine microbial laboratory antibiotic sensitivity
Quality of life COPD assessment Test (CAT) score at day 90Day 90Quality of life COPD assessment Test (CAT) score at day 90 post index discharge. The CAT is a validated, short (8-item) and simple patient completed questionnaire, with good discriminant properties, developed for use in routine clinical practice to measure the health status of patients with COPD. The CAT has a scoring range of 0-40, with 0 being the minimal score indicating no disease symptoms (better outcome) and 40 being the maximum indicating the greatest severity of COPD (worse outcome).
Quality of life COPD assessment Test (CAT) score at day 180Day 180Quality of life COPD assessment Test (CAT) score at day 180 post index discharge. The CAT is a validated, short (8-item) and simple patient completed questionnaire, with good discriminant properties, developed for use in routine clinical practice to measure the health status of patients with COPD. The CAT has a scoring range of 0-40, with 0 being the minimal score indicating no disease symptoms (better outcome) and 40 being the maximum indicating the greatest severity of COPD (worse outcome).
Quality of life COPD assessment Test (CAT) score at 1 yearMonth 12Quality of life COPD assessment Test (CAT) score at 1 year post index discharge. The CAT is a validated, short (8-item) and simple patient completed questionnaire, with good discriminant properties, developed for use in routine clinical practice to measure the health status of patients with COPD. The CAT has a scoring range of 0-40, with 0 being the minimal score indicating no disease symptoms (better outcome) and 40 being the maximum indicating the greatest severity of COPD (worse outcome).
EQ-5D-5L Health questionnaire (quality of life) at 1 yearMonth 12EQ-5D-5L Health Questionnaire score (quality of life) is used to ascertain participants' quality of life as reflected by their capacity for mobility, self care, usual activities, pain or discomfort, anxiety and depression. Mobility self care and usual activities components are graded from no problems to unable to perform (from best outcome to worst outcome respectively). Pain, anxiety and depression are graded on the scale from none to extreme (from best outcome to worst outcome respectively).

Countries

United Kingdom

Contacts

Primary ContactMona Bafadhel, Professor
mona.bafadhel@kcl.ac.uk+44207 848 0606
Backup ContactTrial Manager
rapid-rescue@kcl.ac.uk+44 20 7848 0532

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026