Skip to content

Molecular Analysis for Gastro-Esophageal Cancer: Multicenter Discrete Choice Experiment

Molecular Analysis for Gastro-Esophageal Cancer: Multicenter Discrete Choice Experiment

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06346080
Acronym
MAGECmultiDiCE
Enrollment
2200
Registered
2024-04-03
Start date
2024-08-01
Completion date
2026-08-01
Last updated
2026-02-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Esophageal Cancer, Gastric Cancer

Keywords

Esophageal cancer, Survey, Gastric cancer

Brief summary

The goal of this survey is to investigate the participants' preference for a specific screening/diagnostic tool to detect and assess gastro-esophageal cancer. The main question it aims to answer are: * Which diagnostic modality is preferred by patients and the general population? * Which features of the diagnostic test are most detrimental in the decision-making for one or the other modality? * Are geographical differences present in regard to the preference for a diagnostic modality? Participants will be asked to complete a survey of 20-25min, including a brief intake regarding their socio-economic status. This approach will allow us to correct for confounding factors.

Interventions

OTHERSurvey

Discrete choice survey

Sponsors

KU Leuven
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

A survey will be conducted in a single group of participants from different geographical regions and backgrounds

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Individuals \>18yo to 75yo (upper age limit of Barrett's surveillance) 2. Access to computer or smartphone 3. Clear understanding of available languages of the experiment (English, French, Dutch, Spanish, German, Chinese, Japanese)

Exclusion criteria

1. Individuals less than 18yo and more than 75yo 2. Incarcerated individuals

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The rate of contribution of diagnostic features to the preference of participants2 yearsA part-worth analysis, expressed as percentage, from a discrete choice experiment (questionnaire) will assess the features that are most important to the participants
The percentage differences in preference of participants between geographical regions2 yearsDifferences in preferences will be compared between different geographical regions using chi-squared or McNemar's test

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Assess the rate patient-level demographics influence the importance of a test feature, expressed as an odds ratio2 yearsAssess the influence of demographic characteristics on the decision-making process using a multivariable logistic regression model, providing odds ratios.
Assess the rate of trade-off demonstrated as odds ratio between cancer-related mortality reduction and costs2 yearsBased on an anticipated cancer detection and cost, we will assess the willingness-to-pay using a multivariable logistic regression, providing odds ratios.

Countries

Belgium

Contacts

CONTACTStijn Vanstraelen, MD
stijn.vanstraelen@kuleuven.be16346822
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORStijn Vanstraelen, MD

UZ Leuven

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORPhilippe Nafteux, MD, PhD

UZ Leuven

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 19, 2026