Skip to content

Response in Patients with Persistent Pelvic Pain to Motor Imagery Through Auditory or Visual Input. a Pilot Randomized Trial.

Response in Patients with Persistent Pelvic Pain to Explicit Motor Imagery Through Auditory or Visual Input

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06343649
Enrollment
49
Registered
2024-04-02
Start date
2023-11-01
Completion date
2023-11-30
Last updated
2025-01-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pelvic Pain

Keywords

pain, pelvic pain

Brief summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the response of Explicit Motor Imagery interventions in patients suffering Persistent Pelvic Pain. The main question it aims to answer is: • Does the modality of application of Explicit Motor Imagery, either through visual or auditory stimuli, influence the response in patients suffering Persistent Pelvic Pain? Participants will receive an online Explicit Motor Imagery program either through visual inputs or auditory inputs. They will be instructed to follow the program en register their response. Researchers will compare visual Explicit Motor Imagery and auditory Explicit Motor Imagery to see if different inputs generate different responses in patients suffering Persistent Pelvic Pain.

Interventions

OTHERVisual

Delivery of images to conduct several exercises of Explicit Motor Imagery

Delivery of audio recordings to conduct several exercises of Explicit Motor Imagery

Sponsors

University of Valencia
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Experience persistent pain for a minimum duration of six months. * Achieve a minimum score of six points on the Chronic Pelvic Pain Questionnaire (CPPQ), a validated instrument designed to assess the discrimination of pain.

Exclusion criteria

* Participants with a medically diagnosed condition that logically accounts for the presence of pain during the aforementioned six-month period

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Numerical Rating ScaleBaseline to two weeksSelf-administered scale that requires the patient to rate their pain intensity on a 0-10 scale, where 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain imaginable. Higher scores indicate worse outcomes.
Pain Vigilance and Awareness QuestionnaireBaseline to two weeksSelf-administered questionnaire to measure attention to pain. 16- item questionnaire, where each item is scored as a six- point Likert scale that ranges from zero (never) to five (always), resulting in a sum score between zero and 80. Higher scores indicate worse outcomes.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Movement Imagery Questionnaire-RevisedBaselineAssesses visual and kinesthetic movement imagery abilities. Self-adminstered instrument comprised of 2 subscales: Visual Imagery (4 items) and Kinesthetic Imagery (4 items). Respondents assign a value from a 7-point scale, which indicates the ease or difficulty with which the movement was seen/felt. Higher scores indicate worse movement imagery abilities.

Countries

Spain

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026