Skip to content

An Exosome-Based Liquid Biopsy for the Differential Diagnosis of Primary Liver Cancer

An Exosome-Based Liquid Biopsy for the Differential Diagnosis of Primary Liver Cancer

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06342414
Acronym
ELUCIDATE
Enrollment
400
Registered
2024-04-02
Start date
2024-03-15
Completion date
2028-06-18
Last updated
2026-07-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cholangiocarcinoma, Hepatic Cancer, Hepatic Carcinoma, Hepatocellular Carcinoma, Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma, Primary Liver Cancer, Primary Liver Carcinoma

Keywords

Exosome, micro RNA, Differential Diagnosis

Brief summary

It is sometimes difficult to precisely understand whether a primary liver cancer is a hepatocellular carcinoma or a cholangiocarcinoma. The researchers will develop and validate a liquid biopsy, based on exosomal content analysis and powered by machine learning, to help clinicians differentiate these two cancers before surgery.

Detailed description

Primary liver cancers (PLCs) encompass a diverse group of malignancies originating from the liver, collectively ranking as the third leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide in 2020. Among PLCs, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) represent the most predominant subtypes. Despite their collective grouping as PLCs, ICC and HCC patients exhibit distinct etiologies, pathologies, and clinical characteristics, necessitating different treatment approaches. Accurate differentiation between ICC and HCC is paramount to optimize patient outcomes and guide personalized treatment decisions. However, a definitive diagnosis is often obtained only after the pathological review of the resected neoplastic tissue, which requires invasive tumor sampling and poses risks of complications such as hemorrhage and tumor cell seeding. Consequently, there is a pressing clinical need to develop noninvasive diagnostic approaches to achieve an accurate differential diagnosis for patients with these distinct forms of PLCs. This study involves the development and validation of a liquid biopsy, assessing circulating exosomal microRNAs (exo-miRNA) for indirect sampling of tumor tissue in the bloodstream. The researchers intend to harness machine learning and bioinformatics to create a cost-efficient, non-invasive, clinic-friendly assay with high sensitivity and specificity, aiding the differential diagnosis between ICC and HCC. The researchers intend to do so in three phases: 1. To perform comprehensive small RNA-Seq from exo-miRNA from patients with ICC and HCC. 2. To develop and train a differential diagnosis panel based on advanced machine-learning models to obtain a final differential diagnosis biomarker. 3. To validate the findings in an independent cohort of ICC and HCC. In summary, this proposal promises to improve patient care and help clinicians perform a more reliable differential diagnosis between ICC and HCC in patients with primary liver cancer.

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTELUCIDATE

ELUCIDATE (Evaluation of Liver Cholangiocarcinoma Intrahepatic)

Sponsors

City of Hope Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_ONLY
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* A histologically confirmed diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma * A histologically confirmed diagnosis of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma * Received standard diagnostic and staging procedures as per local guidelines * Availability of at least one blood-derived sample, drawn before receiving any curative-intent treatment

Exclusion criteria

* Lack of or inability to provide informed consent * Synchronous hepatocellular carcinoma and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma * Primary liver cancer other than hepatocellular carcinoma or intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma * Secondary liver cancer

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
SensitivityThrough study completion, an average of 1 yearTrue Positive Rate: the probability of a positive test result, conditioned on the individual truly being positive

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
SpecificityThrough study completion, an average of 1 yearTrue Negative Rate: the probability of a negative test result, conditioned on the individual truly being negative
Proportion of correct predictions (true positives and true negatives) among the total number of cases (i.e., accuracy)Through study completion, an average of 1 yearA measure of trueness: proportion of correct predictions (both true positives and true negatives) among the total number of cases examined

Countries

Japan, United States

Contacts

CONTACTAjay Goel, PhD
AJGOEL@COH.ORG6262183452
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORAjay Goel, PhD

City of Hope Medical Center

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jul 8, 2026