Skip to content

EUS Examination Using EndoSound Vision System vs. Standard Echoendoscope

Randomized Trial of Endoscopic Ultrasound Examination Using EndoSound Vision System vs. Standard Echoendoscope

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06340620
Enrollment
140
Registered
2024-04-01
Start date
2024-03-25
Completion date
2027-12-31
Last updated
2024-04-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Bile Duct Cancer, Bile Duct Diseases, Gastrointestinal Cancer, Gastrointestinal Tumor, Lymph Node Disease, Pancreatic Cancer, Pancreatic Cyst, Pancreatic Disease, Submucosal Tumor of Gastrointestinal Tract

Keywords

Endoscopic ultrasound, EndoSound Vision System, Randomized trial

Brief summary

This is a randomized trial to compare the standard echoendoscope with the newly developed EndoSound Visual System in the evaluation of lesions in the gastrointestinal tract.

Detailed description

Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is the gold standard for evaluation and biopsy of lesions in the pancreaticobiliary tract, subepithelial lesions in the gastrointestinal tract and luminal cancer staging due to its high sensitivity and specificity. Endoscopic ultrasound examination is performed by echoendoscopes, which are endoscopes with an ultrasound probe at the distal end to allow endoscopic ultrasound evaluation. A new endoscopic ultrasound system - the EndoSound Visual System has now been developed for endoscopic ultrasound examination. The EndoSound Visual System is a device that can be attached externally to upper gastrointestinal endoscopes, thereby converting a standard endoscope into an echoendoscope which can then be used to perform an EUS examination. The aim of this randomized trial is to compare the standard echoendoscope with the newly developed EndoSound Visual System in the evaluation of lesions in the gastrointestinal tract.

Interventions

DEVICEEndoscopic ultrasound examination

Endoscopic ultrasound examination will be performed.

Sponsors

Orlando Health, Inc.
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 100 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age ≥ 18 years * Any patient undergoing EUS examination for evaluation of the pancreas, bile duct, mediastinal or intraabdominal lymph nodes, or luminal lesions in the esophagus, stomach, duodenum or colon.

Exclusion criteria

* Age \< 18 years. * Unable to obtain consent for the procedure from either the patient or LAR. * Intrauterine pregnancy.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Rate of successful completion of the requisite EUS examination1 dayRate of successful completion of the requisite examination during EUS between the EndoSound Vision System and standard echoendoscopes will be assessed, compared as a percentage of successfully completed examinations between the standard echoendoscope and Endosound Vision System.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Procedure costs7 daysCosts associated with the endoscopic ultrasound procedures between the EndoSound Vision System and standard echoendoscopes.
Ease of maneuverability of the device1 dayThe ease of maneuverability during EUS between the EndoSound Vision System and standard echoendoscopes will be assessed, based on a rating scale of 1 to 5 (whereby 1 is the most easy to maneuver and 5 is the most difficult to maneuver).
Quality of EUS imaging1 dayThe quality of EUS imaging during EUS between the EndoSound Vision System and standard echoendoscopes will be assessed, based on a rating scale of 1 to 5 (whereby 1 is the best quality imaging and 5 is the worst quality imaging).
Ease of performing tissue acquisition1 dayThe ease of performing tissue acquisition during EUS between the EndoSound Vision System and standard echoendoscopes will be assessed, based on a rating scale of 1 to 5 (whereby 1 is the most easy to perform and 5 is the most difficult to perform).
Rate of procedure-related adverse events7 daysRate of procedure-related adverse events between the EndoSound Vision System and standard echoendoscopes.
Diagnostic adequacy of procured specimen in cell block7 daysRate of diagnostic adequacy of procured tissue specimen in cell block between the EndoSound Vision System and standard echoendoscopes.
Diagnostic accuracy of procured specimen7 daysRate of diagnostic accuracy of procured tissue specimen between the EndoSound Vision System and standard echoendoscopes.
Procedure duration1 dayDuration of procedure between the EndoSound Vision System and standard echoendoscopes.
Diagnostic adequacy of procured specimen on onsite evaluation7 daysRate of diagnostic adequacy of procured tissue specimen on onsite evaluation between the EndoSound Vision System and standard echoendoscopes.

Countries

United States

Contacts

Primary ContactJi Young Bang, MD MPH
jiyoung.bang@orlandohealth.com321-841-2431
Backup ContactBarbara Broome
barbara.broome@orlandohealth.com321-841-4356

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026