Cervical Radiculopathy
Conditions
Keywords
Tensioners mobilization, Manual Therapy and neck pain
Brief summary
This study will be a randomized clinical trial in which Slider versus Tensioners Nerve Gliding Technique along with Mulligan Spinal Mobilization will be applied on the individuals with cerviculorediculopathy and changes will be recorded using different methods and tools. Convenient sampling technique will be used to collect the data. The sample size of 40 patients will be recruited. Patients will be randomly allocated into two different groups through sealed envelope method.20 patients will be allocated in each group A will be treated with Slider Nerve Gliding Technique along with Mulligan Spinal Mobilization Technique; Group B will be treated with Tensioners Nerve Gliding Technique along with Mulligan Spinal Mobilization Technique .Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), Neck Disability Index (NDI) and goniometer will be used as Data collecting tools. After data collection from defined study setting, data will be entered and analyzed.
Detailed description
Neck pain is widespread and causes significant pain and disability. In the setting of cervical radiculopathy, because the nerve root of a spinal nerve is compressed It is frequently caused by cervical disc herniation and cervical spondylitis. Compression can result from intervertebral disc herniation, osteophyte formation, or other mass effects near the exit foramen of the cervical spine. This results in lower motor neurons symptoms and often presents with arm pain, weakness, and/or sensory loss, with or without associated neck pain. The most common causes of cervical radiculopathy are cervical disc herniation and cervical spondylosis. The main aim of our study to determine which combination of techniques Slider versus Tensioners Nerve Gliding Technique along with Mulligan Spinal Mobilization is more effective on Pain, Range of Motion and Disability in patients with Cervical Radiculopathy. Combination of mulligan mobilization with slider and tensioners techniques to determine which combination of technique is more helpful in reducing overall disease burden and will help in increasing Quality of life.Bothcombination combination are checked individually before but their effects are not compared previously.
Interventions
OTHERSlider Nerve Gliding Technique along with Mulligan Spinal Mobilization Technique
In this group 21 patients will perform Slider Nerve Gliding Technique along with Mulligan Spinal Mobilization Technique.Protocol for 4 weeks 12 Sessions (3 sessions in a week) and 10 sec rest between each segment, 3 sets of 10 repetitions. Patient is sitting in the chair / plinth. Therapist's standing behind the patient.
OTHERTensioners Nerve Gliding Technique along with Mulligan Spinal Mobilization Technique
In this group 21 patients will perform Tensioners Nerve Gliding Technique along with Mulligan Spinal Mobilization Technique.Protocol for 4 weeks 12 Sessions (3 sessions in a week) and 10 sec rest between each segment, 3 sets of 10 repetitions. Patient is sitting in the chair / plinth. Therapist's standing behind the patient.
Sponsors
Riphah International University
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
• Patient with cervical radiculopathy * Both gender Age * Participants having range 20-60 years both male and female are included. * Unilateral neck pain refers to upper extremity from 2-3 weeks. * Positive upper limb tension test, spurling test, cervical distraction test and ipsilateral cervical rotation less than 60. * NDI less than 50% * NPRS less than 3 more than 7
Exclusion criteria
* Inflammation malignancy, neurological disorder * Metabolic disorders * Neck pain associated with headache and facial pain * VBI, vertigo, dizziness, motor imbalance, vertebral impairment, pregnancy, skin allergy * History of recent surgery, trauma and fractures of cervical spine, dislocation, subluxation of upper limb, * rheumatoid arthritis, osteoporosis, spondylolistheasis, cervical surgeries skin allergy, referred pain in patient with cardiac ischemia * Patients having any other therapeutic intervention or medical treatment
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Numeric Pain Rating Scale | 4 Weeks | NPRS consists of a scale with 0-10 readings. The zero denotes no pain while 1, 2, 3 denotes to mild pain, 4, 5, 6 denotes to moderate pain while 7-10 denotes to severe pain. |
| Neck disability index | 4 Weeks | .The NDI consists of ten questions. Each question has six different assertions expressing progressive levels of pain or limitation in activities. Item scores range from 0 (no pain or limitation) to 5 (as much pain as possible or maximal limitation). The total NDI score ranges from 0 to 5 points. Higher scores indicate greater disability. |
| Goniometer | 4 Weeks | Active Range of Motion of the patient will be assessed using a universal standard goniometer for cervical flexion, extension, side flexion (left and right), rotation (left and right). The data will be collected at baseline cervical goniometry. |
Countries
Pakistan
Outcome results
None listed