Skip to content

Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing Group Treatment for Caregivers of Pediatric Brain Tumor Patients

Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing Integrative Group Treatment Protocol Applied to Caregivers of Children With Pediatric Brain Tumor: a Feasibility Study and a Pilot Randomized Group Treatment Trial.

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06339814
Enrollment
48
Registered
2024-04-01
Start date
2023-03-10
Completion date
2024-11-30
Last updated
2024-04-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Caregiver Burden

Brief summary

Caregivers of pediatric brain tumor survivors may develop high levels of psychological distress, mostly depression and anxiety, with effects comparable to those of a traumatic event. Several studies suggest that Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing could be a promising treatment in similar clinical populations (i.e. adults with brain tumor), but it has never been used for caregivers of pediatric brain tumor. The aims of the present study will be to test the feasibility of the Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing Integrative Group Treatment Protocol for caregivers of pediatric brain tumor survivors in a clinical setting and to evaluate its effectiveness in decreasing the psychological distress in this population. The study will be monocentric, and with two parallel branches: the Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing Integrative Group Treatment Protocol group, who will receive a 4-session treatment, versus the Treatment as Usual condition, who will receive standard support. Emotional distress will be measured before the treatment, immediately after the end of it, and two months later (follow-up), by means of several clinical scales. Twenty-four subjects will be recruited for each group (caregivers and controls). Statistical analysis will be performed to test the effect of the intervention. If a positive outcome occurs, it could offer preliminary results about the validity of the Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing in treating this population's difficulties.

Detailed description

Pediatric cancer is a stressful life event, with a huge impact both on the diagnosed children and on their parents, comparable to that of a traumatic event. Caregivers of pediatric brain tumor survivors show several psychological difficulties, such as symptoms of anxiety, depression, and post-traumatic stress disorder. The presence of psychological distress throughout the oncological path of the child causes a long-term high burden impact, leading to an increased need for psychological support from the caregivers. The Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing has never been used for caregivers of pediatric brain tumor: neither individual nor Integrative Group Treatment Protocol. Hence, the aims of the present study are: (1) to test the feasibility of the Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing Integrative Group Treatment Protocol for caregivers of patients with pediatric brain tumor in a clinical setting; (2) to evaluate whether Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing Integrative Group Treatment Protocol is effective in decreasing psychological distress in caregivers. Several studies suggest that Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing could be a promising treatment for psychological distress, given the existing literature on caregivers of adult patients with brain tumor or dementia. Design: The study will be monocentric, with two parallel branches, thus conforming to a Randomized Group Treatment Trial: Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing Integrative Group Treatment Protocol (those who will receive Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing treatment plus the standard support) versus Treatment As Usual condition (those who will receive only standard support). The assessment will be performed at the moment of recruitment (T0), after the intervention for the Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing Integrative Group Treatment Protocol group and after 1 month for the Treatment As Usual condition (T1), and for both 2 months after T1 (T2). Participants: Pediatric brain tumor caregivers and controls (24 subjects in each, 48 subjects in total) will be recruited at La Nostra Famiglia, IRCCS E. Medea, Bosisio Parini (LC), Italy. Inclusion criteria: being the primary caregivers of a patient with a diagnosis of brain tumor, with evidence of one or more traumatic events causing trauma related symptoms (Impact of Event Scale-Revised \> 0, and Subjective Units of Distress \> 5); being fluent in Italian and with at least three years of education. Exclusion criteria: Evidence of severe psychiatric disorders. Block randomization will be performed to ensure a balance in sample size across groups over time. Caregivers' assessment will include: a data form to collect clinical and socio-demographic features (age, gender, educational level, occupation, type of pediatric brain tumor, treatments …), a feasibility questionnaire (only for the feasibility study), the Impact of Event Scale-Revised, the Subjective Units of Distress, the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, the Beck Depression In-ventory, the Parenting Stress Index, the Caregiver Burden Inventory, and the Family Assessment Device 3. Intervention: An Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing psychotherapist will hold the Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing Integrative Group Treatment Protocol sessions, dedicated to psychoeducation, imagery exercises, stabilization techniques and the reprocessing of traumatic events. The Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing Integrative Group Treatment Protocol will be composed of 4 sessions of 120 minutes each. The number of the sessions has been chosen referring to the literature and based on the length of the hospitalization in the Institute. In the case of an emergency (e.g. increased number of Covid-19 cases), groups can also be held online. Supervision by an Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing practitioner will be requested. Analyses: (i) Spearman's correlations to test the relationship between clinical and socio-demographical variables; (ii) A series of generalized linear mixed models with clinical variables (outcomes of the psychological tests) as dependent variables, random intercept (grouped by subject) and with time (T0 versus T1 versus T2) and branch (Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing Integrative Group Treatment Protocol versus Treatment As usual) as fixed effect predictors to test the intervention. If a decrease in the psychological symptoms occurs, it could offer preliminary results about the validity of the Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing in alleviating the difficulties caregivers have in caring for pediatric BT survivor, easing the burden of an oncological disease with an unpredictable progression. Possible limitations of the study could include dropouts, the need for a wider sample for more rigorous results or a longer-term assessment (i.e. 6 months after the end of Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing Integrative Group Treatment Protocol ) to evaluate the stabilization of the positive effects.

Interventions

OTHEREye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing Integrative Group Treatment Protocol

An Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing psychotherapist will hold the Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing Integrative Group Treatment Protocol sessions, dedicated to psychoeducation, imagery exercises, stabilization techniques and the reprocessing of traumatic events. The Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing Integrative Group Treatment Protocol will be composed of 4 sessions of 120 minutes each.

OTHERTreatment As Usual

Treatment As Usual condition will receive only standard support.

Sponsors

IRCCS Eugenio Medea
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

The study will be with two parallel branches, thus conforming to a Randomized Group Treatment Trial: Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing Integrative Group Treatment Protocol (those who will receive Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing treatment plus the standard support) versus Treatment As Usual condition (those who will receive only standard support). The assessment will be performed at the moment of recruitment (T0), after the intervention for the Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing Integrative Group Treatment Protocol group and after 1 month for the Treatment As Usual condition (T1), and for both 2 months after T1 (T2).

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* being the primary caregivers of a patient with a diagnosis of brain tumor, * evidence of one or more traumatic events causing trauma related symptoms (Impact of Event Scale-Revised \> 0, and Subjective Units of Distress \> 5); * being fluent in Italian * with at least three years of education.

Exclusion criteria

* Evidence of severe psychiatric disorders.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Impact of Event Scale-Revised-Total scoreat the moment of recruitment (T0), after 1 month (T1), and 2 months after T1 (T2) for both groupsThe Impact of Event Scale - Revised was designed as a measure of post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms, and is a short, easily administered self-report questionnaire. It can be used for repeated measurements over time to monitor progress and is best used for recent and specific traumatic events. Minimum-maximum value:0-88. Higher scores mean worse outcome.
Impact of Event Scale-Revised-Intrusion scoreat the moment of recruitment (T0), after 1 month (T1), and 2 months after T1 (T2) for both groupsThe Impact of Event Scale - Revised was designed as a measure of post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms, and is a short, easily administered self-report questionnaire. It can be used for repeated measurements over time to monitor progress and is best used for recent and specific traumatic events. Minimum-maximum value:0-32;maximum mean score: 4. Higher scores mean worse outcome.
Impact of Event Scale-Revised-Avoidance scoreat the moment of recruitment (T0), after 1 month (T1), and 2 months after T1 (T2) for both groupsThe Impact of Event Scale - Revised was designed as a measure of post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms, and is a short, easily administered self-report questionnaire. It can be used for repeated measurements over time to monitor progress and is best used for recent and specific traumatic events. Minimum-maximum value:0-32;maximum mean score: 4. Higher scores mean worse outcome.
Impact of Event Scale-Revised-Hyperarousal scoreat the moment of recruitment (T0), after 1 month (T1), and 2 months after T1 (T2) for both groupsThe Impact of Event Scale - Revised was designed as a measure of post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms, and is a short, easily administered self-report questionnaire. It can be used for repeated measurements over time to monitor progress and is best used for recent and specific traumatic events. Minimum-maximum value:0-24;maximum mean score: 4. Higher scores mean worse outcome.
Subjective Units of Distress-Total Scoreat the moment of recruitment (T0), after 1 month (T1), and 2 months after T1 (T2) for both groupsThe Subjective Units of Distress Scale is a tool for measuring the intensity of feelings and other internal experiences, such as anxiety, anger, agitation, stress or other painful feelings. The score ranges between 0 (no disturbance) and 10 (maximum perceived disturbance). Minimum-maximum value:0-10. Higher scores mean worse outcome.
State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-State anxiety scoreat the moment of recruitment (T0), after 1 month (T1), and 2 months after T1 (T2) for both groupsThe State-Trait Anxiety Inventory is a 40-item self-report scale that assesses separate dimensions of state and trait anxiety. Examples of what the the tool measures include feelings of apprehension, tension, nervousness, and worry. Minimum-maximum value: 20-80. Higher scores mean worse outcome.
State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-Trait anxiety scoreat the moment of recruitment (T0), after 1 month (T1), and 2 months after T1 (T2) for both groupsThe State-Trait Anxiety Inventory is a 40-item self-report scale that assesses separate dimensions of state and trait anxiety. Examples of what the the tool measures include feelings of apprehension, tension, nervousness, and worry. Minimum-maximum value: 20-80. Higher scores mean worse outcome.
Beck Depression Inventory-Total scoreat the moment of recruitment (T0), after 1 month (T1), and 2 months after T1 (T2) for both groupsThe Beck Depression Inventory is a 21-item, multiple-choice inventory. Respondents are asked to rate each item based on four response choices according to the severity of the symptoms, ranging from the absence of a symptom to an intense level, during the past week. Minimum-maximum value: 0-63. Higher scores mean worse outcome.
Parenting Stress Index-Total scoreat the moment of recruitment (T0), after 1 month (T1), and 2 months after T1 (T2) for both groupsThe Parenting Stress Index is used to measure the relative stress in the parent-child relationship. It can be used for parents of children up to 12 years. Minimum-maximum value: 36-180. Higher scores mean worse outcome.
Parenting Stress Index-Parental stress scoreat the moment of recruitment (T0), after 1 month (T1), and 2 months after T1 (T2) for both groupsThe Parenting Stress Index is used to measure the relative stress in the parent-child relationship. It can be used for parents of children up to 12 years. Minimum-maximum value: 12-60. Higher scores mean worse outcome.
Parenting Stress Index-Dysfunctional interaction scoreat the moment of recruitment (T0), after 1 month (T1), and 2 months after T1 (T2) for both groupsThe Parenting Stress Index is used to measure the relative stress in the parent-child relationship. It can be used for parents of children up to 12 years. Minimum-maximum value: 12-60. Higher scores mean worse outcome.
Parenting Stress Index-Hard child scoreat the moment of recruitment (T0), after 1 month (T1), and 2 months after T1 (T2) for both groupsThe Parenting Stress Index is used to measure the relative stress in the parent-child relationship. It can be used for parents of children up to 12 years. Minimum-maximum value: 12-60. Higher scores mean worse outcome.
Stress Index for Parents of Adolescents-Total stress scoreat the moment of recruitment (T0), after 1 month (T1), and 2 months after T1 (T2) for both groupsThe Stress Index for Parents of Adolescents is a screening and diagnostic instrument that identifies areas of stress in parent-adolescent interactions, allowing examination of the relationship of parenting stress to adolescent characteristics, parent characteristics, the quality of the adolescent-parent interactions, and stressful life circumstances. It can be used for parents of children between 11 and 19 years. Minimum-maximum value: 112-560. Higher scores mean worse outcome.
Stress Index for Parents of Adolescents-Life restrictions scoreat the moment of recruitment (T0), after 1 month (T1), and 2 months after T1 (T2) for both groupsThe Stress Index for Parents of Adolescents is a screening and diagnostic instrument that identifies areas of stress in parent-adolescent interactions, allowing examination of the relationship of parenting stress to adolescent characteristics, parent characteristics, the quality of the adolescent-parent interactions, and stressful life circumstances. It can be used for parents of children between 11 and 19 years. Minimum-maximum value: 10-50. Higher scores mean worse outcome
Stress Index for Parents of Adolescents-Relationship with spouse/partner scoreat the moment of recruitment (T0), after 1 month (T1), and 2 months after T1 (T2) for both groupsThe Stress Index for Parents of Adolescents is a screening and diagnostic instrument that identifies areas of stress in parent-adolescent interactions, allowing examination of the relationship of parenting stress to adolescent characteristics, parent characteristics, the quality of the adolescent-parent interactions, and stressful life circumstances. It can be used for parents of children between 11 and 19 years. Minimum-maximum value: 9-45. Higher scores mean worse outcome
Stress Index for Parents of Adolescents-Social alienation scoreat the moment of recruitment (T0), after 1 month (T1), and 2 months after T1 (T2) for both groupsThe Stress Index for Parents of Adolescents is a screening and diagnostic instrument that identifies areas of stress in parent-adolescent interactions, allowing examination of the relationship of parenting stress to adolescent characteristics, parent characteristics, the quality of the adolescent-parent interactions, and stressful life circumstances. It can be used for parents of children between 11 and 19 years. Minimum-maximum value: 7-35. Higher scores mean worse outcome
Stress Index for Parents of Adolescents-Incompetence/guilt scoreat the moment of recruitment (T0), after 1 month (T1), and 2 months after T1 (T2) for both groupsThe Stress Index for Parents of Adolescents is a screening and diagnostic instrument that identifies areas of stress in parent-adolescent interactions, allowing examination of the relationship of parenting stress to adolescent characteristics, parent characteristics, the quality of the adolescent-parent interactions, and stressful life circumstances. It can be used for parents of children between 11 and 19 years. Minimum-maximum value: 8-40. Higher scores mean worse outcome
Caregiver Burden Inventory-Time-dependence burden scoreat the moment of recruitment (T0), after 1 month (T1), and 2 months after T1 (T2) for both groupsThe Caregiver Burden Inventory comprises 24 closed questions to assess the physical, psychological, emotional, social and financial problems experienced by family caregivers. Minimum-maximum value: 0-20. Higher scores mean worse outcome.
Caregiver Burden Inventory-Developmental burden scoreat the moment of recruitment (T0), after 1 month (T1), and 2 months after T1 (T2) for both groupsThe Caregiver Burden Inventory comprises 24 closed questions to assess the physical, psychological, emotional, social and financial problems experienced by family caregivers. Minimum-maximum value: 0-20. Higher scores mean worse outcome.
Caregiver Burden Inventory-Physical burden scoreat the moment of recruitment (T0), after 1 month (T1), and 2 months after T1 (T2) for both groupsThe Caregiver Burden Inventory comprises 24 closed questions to assess the physical, psychological, emotional, social and financial problems experienced by family caregivers. Minimum-maximum value: 0-16. Higher scores mean worse outcome.
Caregiver Burden Inventory-Social burden scoreat the moment of recruitment (T0), after 1 month (T1), and 2 months after T1 (T2) for both groupsThe Caregiver Burden Inventory comprises 24 closed questions to assess the physical, psychological, emotional, social and financial problems experienced by family caregivers. Minimum-maximum value: 0-20. Higher scores mean worse outcome.
Caregiver Burden Inventory-Emotional burden scoreat the moment of recruitment (T0), after 1 month (T1), and 2 months after T1 (T2) for both groupsThe Caregiver Burden Inventory comprises 24 closed questions to assess the physical, psychological, emotional, social and financial problems experienced by family caregivers. Minimum-maximum value: 0-20. Higher scores mean worse outcome.
Family Assessment Device 3-Problem Solving scoreat the moment of recruitment (T0), after 1 month (T1), and 2 months after T1 (T2) for both groupsThe McMaster Family Assessment Device is a 60-item questionnaire that measures an individual's perceptions of his/her family. Minimum-maximum value: 6-24. Higher scores mean worse outcome.
Family Assessment Device 3-Communication scoreat the moment of recruitment (T0), after 1 month (T1), and 2 months after T1 (T2) for both groupsThe McMaster Family Assessment Device is a 60-item questionnaire that measures an individual's perceptions of his/her family. Minimum-maximum value: 6-40. Higher scores mean worse outcome.
Family Assessment Device 3-Roles scoreat the moment of recruitment (T0), after 1 month (T1), and 2 months after T1 (T2) for both groupsThe McMaster Family Assessment Device is a 60-item questionnaire that measures an individual's perceptions of his/her family. Minimum-maximum value: 6-44. Higher scores mean worse outcome.
Family Assessment Device 3-Affective Responsiveness scoreat the moment of recruitment (T0), after 1 month (T1), and 2 months after T1 (T2) for both groupsThe McMaster Family Assessment Device is a 60-item questionnaire that measures an individual's perceptions of his/her family. Minimum-maximum value: 6-24. Higher scores mean worse outcome.
Family Assessment Device 3-Affective Involvement scoreat the moment of recruitment (T0), after 1 month (T1), and 2 months after T1 (T2) for both groupsThe McMaster Family Assessment Device is a 60-item questionnaire that measures an individual's perceptions of his/her family. Minimum-maximum value: 6-28. Higher scores mean worse outcome.
Family Assessment Device 3-Behavior Control scoreat the moment of recruitment (T0), after 1 month (T1), and 2 months after T1 (T2) for both groupsThe McMaster Family Assessment Device is a 60-item questionnaire that measures an individual's perceptions of his/her family. Minimum-maximum value: 6-36. Higher scores mean worse outcome.
Family Assessment Device 3-General Functioning scoreat the moment of recruitment (T0), after 1 month (T1), and 2 months after T1 (T2) for both groupsThe McMaster Family Assessment Device is a 60-item questionnaire that measures an individual's perceptions of his/her family. Minimum-maximum value: 6-48. Higher scores mean worse outcome.

Countries

Italy

Contacts

Primary ContactMaria Chiara Oprandi
chiara.oprandi@lanostrafamiglia.it+39 340 05 18 917

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026