Skip to content

Evaluation of the Venous Thrombotic Biological Profile of Different PCOS Phenotypes: French Cross-sectional Study

Evaluation of the Venous Thrombotic Biological Profile of Different PCOS Phenotypes: French Cross-sectional Study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06339567
Acronym
Hemo-PCOS
Enrollment
352
Registered
2024-04-01
Start date
2024-02-08
Completion date
2027-02-07
Last updated
2026-08-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Polycystic Ovary Syndrome

Brief summary

Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is the most common endocrine disorder of women of childbearing age. PCOS can be individualized into several phenotypes, taking into account in particular the presence of hyperandrogenism, insulin resistance and BMI. Hyperandrogenism and insulin resistance appear to be important factors in the development of cardiovascular cardiovascular disease. In addition, patients frequently use anti-androgenic and/or contraceptive treatments contraceptives, such as combined hormonal contraception (CHC), the use of which is associated with an increased cardiovascular and thrombo and venous thrombosis (VTE). A meta-analysis published in 2020 by Gariani et al. based on three large studies, estimated the risk of VTE in women with PCOS after adjustment for obesity and hormone therapy. This risk was significantly higher compared with women without PCOS (pooled OR 1.89, CI95% 1.60-2.24). No study has looked specifically investigated the risk of VTE according to different PCOS phenotypes. Such data would be very useful in clinical practice, as it would enable monitoring, contraceptive treatment and anti-androgenic anti-androgen treatment according to the PCOS phenotype, while limiting risks. Assessing the differences PCOS phenotypes is limited by the large sample size required. required. VTE is a rare event in women of childbearing age, and the number of PCOS phenotypes is high. PCOS phenotypes. Intermediate markers of VTE risk are used in these situations. These markers are thrombin generation tests (notably ETP) and their sensitivity to activated protein C (nAPCsr) and thrombomodulin (nTMsr), as well as sex-hormone binding globulin (SHBG).

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTThrombotic profile

several thrombotic biological marker will be dosed in blood. (C protein, S protein, CRP us, Factor VIII, TFPI , nAPCsr, SHBG, nTMsr)

Sponsors

Fondation Hôpital Saint-Joseph
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 35 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Be between 18 and 35 years of age at the time of inclusion; * Able to give non-opposition * Strong suspicion of PCOS according to 2023 recommendations * Have stopped hormonal contraception for at least 3 months or insulin-sensitizing treatment for at least 3 months. * Fasting for at least 12 hours. * Be affiliated to a health insurance scheme. * French-speaking

Exclusion criteria

* Already included in a type 1 interventional research protocol (RIPH1). * Be under guardianship or curatorship * Deprived of liberty * Under court protection * Pregnant (positive urine or blood pregnancy test), or within 3 months of post-partum or post abortum, or breastfeeding (or within 3 months of weaning) * Using hormonal contraception or insulin-sensitizing therapy (a wash-out of at least 3 months before inclusion). * Have a personal history of VTE or known thrombophilia. * Current anticoagulant or antiaggregant treatment or treatment stopped less than one month before inclusion. * Have a severe personal medical history in the previous 6 weeks (fracture, infection, hospitalization, surgery, cardiovascular event, cancer).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
biological procoagulant profileone yearEvaluation of the biological procoagulant profile in women of childbearing age with PCOS, in relation to the presence or absence of insulin resistance, by comparing FTE levels between women with PCOS and women without PCOS. the presence or absence of insulin resistance, by comparing ETP levels between women with PCOS without and with insulin resistance

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Insuline resistance and weight1 yearEstimate the prevalence of overweight, obesity, and insulin resistance in women with with PCOS
comparison of procoagulant profile depending on insulin resistance1 yearcomparison of procoagulant biomarker for women with or without insulin resistance
comparison of procoagulant profile depending on hyperangrogenism1 yearcomparison of procoagulant biomarker for women with or without hyperangrogenism
comparison of procoagulant profile depending on PCOS phenotype1 yearcomparison of procoagulant biomarker depending on PCOS phenotype
comparison of procoagulant profile depending on AMH Rate1 yearcomparison of procoagulant biomarker depending on AMH Rate
comparison of QoL score depending on PCOS phenotype1 yearcomparison of PCOS-QoL, SF36 and HADS scores depending on PCOS phenotype

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Aug 19, 2026