Renal Stone
Conditions
Brief summary
Rcompare high-energy versus low-energy laser settings in renal stone lithotripsy using low power machines) Holmium YAG 30 watts, examining their respective advantages, limitations, and overall efficacy.
Detailed description
The prevalence of urinary stone disease treatment has shown a continuous updating Within the armamentarium of urinary stone management, the laser has emerged as a cornerstone for lithotripsy in endourological procedures. The laser technology has witnessed a progressive evolution, transitioning from the established holmium: yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Ho:YAG) laser with pulse modulation to the advent of thulium fiber laser (TFL) and, more recently, the innovative pulsed thulium:YAG (p-Tm:YAG) laser Laser lithotripsy is prefered for its minimally invasive approach and high success rates in fragmenting stones, yet the ongoing debate continues regarding the optimal laser power settings for this procedure. contemporary approaches in laser lithotripsy focus on two primary strategies: fragmenting stones into smaller retrievable parts or breaking them into minute fragments, commonly referred to as 'dust,' facilitating the natural passage of smaller particles The choice between high power and low power settings in laser lithotripsy significantly influences treatment outcomes, including stone fragmentation efficiency, procedural time, and potential tissue damage. High-energy power laser settings offer rapid stone ablation capabilities, enabling quick fragmentation but potentially raising concerns about thermal injury to surrounding tissues. In contrast, low-energy power settings, while reducing the risk of tissue damage, might prolong the procedure and necessitate additional maneuvers for complete stone clearance This study aims to compare high-energy versus low-energy laser settings in renal stone lithotripsy using low power machines) Holmium YAG 30 watts, examining their respective advantages, limitations, and overall efficacy. By scrutinizing existing literature and recent studies, this study intends to provide a 56 comprehensive understanding of the clinical implications of choosing optimal laser settings in urolithiasis comprehensive understanding of the clinical implications of choosing optimal laser settings in urolithiasis.
Interventions
DEVICEHolmium Yag laser
Use two laser energy low and high to reach the optimal setting for stone dusting
Sponsors
Menoufia University
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* adult patients * hard renal stones * less than 2 cm * Hounsfield unit of ≥ 1000
Exclusion criteria
* Patients less than 18 years * ureteral stones * stones with Hounsfield units less than 1000 * stones in calyceal diverticulum * patients with coagulopathy were also excluded from the study.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Stone free rates | One year | Assess stone free rate between two different setting |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Preoperative complications | One year | To assess complications between low and high energy |
Countries
Egypt
Outcome results
None listed