Skip to content

A Clinical Trial to Investigate 18F-AzaFol in the Diagnosis of Large Vessel Vasculitis

Cross-over, Randomized, Open-label, Single-centre, Phase II Clinical Trial to Investigate 18F-AzaFol in the Diagnosis of Large Vessel Vasculitis

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06335888
Acronym
CRAFT
Enrollment
70
Registered
2024-03-28
Start date
2025-02-03
Completion date
2029-05-31
Last updated
2025-02-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Giant Cell Arteritis

Keywords

Tracer, PET imaging

Brief summary

The goal of this open-label clinical trial is to evaluate the efficacy of AzaFol-PET/CT in the diagnosis of GCA (giant cell arteritis), to compare AzaFol- with 2-\[18F\]FDG-PET/CT, and to assess the safety and tolerability of AzaFol in subjects with suspicion of GCA. Participants will undergo AzaFol-PET/CT imaging at a single timepoint.

Detailed description

Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is the most common systemic vasculitis in the elderly population. 2-\[18F\]Fluor-2-desoxy-D-glucose (2-\[18F\]FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/ computed tomography (CT) is performed to diagnose GCA (standard of care, SOC) but unable to reliably distinguish atherosclerosis from vasculitis. Activated macrophages express folate receptor (FR)-β and are enriched in inflamed vascular tissue in GCA. 3'-Aza-2'-\[18F\]Fluoro-Folic Acid (AzaFol) is a nuclear tracer targeting FRβ. The investigators hypothesize that AzaFol is a specific and reliable tracer to visualize activated macrophages in GCA and therefore might improve the discrimination of vasculitic and atherosclerotic lesions as compared to 2-\[18F\]FDG-PET/CT.

Interventions

DRUGAzaFol

AzaFol-PET/CT imaging

DRUGFDG

FDG-PET/CT imaging

Sponsors

Paul Scherrer Institut, Center for Proton Therapy
CollaboratorOTHER
Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Cross-over, randomized, open label, single-centre

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
50 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Individuals ≥ 50 years with clinical suspicion of GCA * Women of childbearing potential must not have a positive serum pregnancy test at the Screening Visit * Subjects must be able to understand and adhere to all protocol requirements and must voluntarily sign and date an informed consent, approved by an independent ethics committee (IEC)/institutional review board (IRB), prior to the initiation of any screening or study-specific procedures. * Are willing and able to comply with procedures required in this protocol.

Exclusion criteria

1. Folate deficiency 2. Female subjects who are pregnant, breastfeeding, or considering becoming pregnant during the study or within 30 days after the last dose of study drug 3. Concomitant treatment with medications that lead to a significant impairment of folic acid levels (methotrexate, pemetrexed, raltitrexed) 4. Concomitant glucose-containing infusion or parental nutrition within 6 hours prior to 2-\[18F\]FDG tracer application 5. Glucose level \> 10 mmol/l at the timepoint of 2-\[18F\]FDG PET/CT 6. Unable to remain in the PET/CT for the duration of the examination 7. Unable to lie still for the duration of the examination (45 min) 8. Unable not to eat or drink (except water) for 6 hours prior to 2-\[18F\]FDG tracer application 9. Prior PET-imaging within 60 days before baseline 10. Intake of vitamin supplements containing \> 1mg/day folic acid within 48 h prior to the PET/CT with AzaFol 11. Known hypersensitivity or allergy to folic acid 12. Enrolment of the investigator, his/her family members, employees and other dependent persons 13. Participation in another study with investigational drug within the 7 days preceding and during the present study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Specificity of the GCA-diagnosis at the patient levelBaselineSpecificity of the GCA-diagnosis at the patient level using visual analysis as a diagnostic method with the clinical expert diagnosis as the reference standard

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Lesion detection rate (visual analysis)BaselineLesion detection rate in PET/CT in patients with suspicion of GCA, in patients with GCA (clinical expert diagnosis), and in patients without GCA (clinical expert diagnosis) by visual analysis at the level of the vessel.
Lesion detection rate (semiquantitative analysis)BaselineLesion detection rate in PET/CT in patients with suspicion of GCA, in patients with GCA (clinical expert diagnosis), and in patients without GCA (clinical expert diagnosis) by semiquantitative analysis at the level of the vessel.
Sensitivity of the GCA-diagnosis at the patient levelBaselineSensitivity of the GCA-diagnosis at the patient level using visual evaluation as a diagnostic method with the clinical expert diagnosis as the reference standard.

Countries

Switzerland

Contacts

Primary ContactBritta Maurer
RI-Studien@insel.ch+41 31 63 2 7229

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026