Skip to content

Efficacy of Mini Sling Versus Transobturator Tape in Surgical Management of Women With Stress Urinary Incontinence

Efficacy of Mini Sling Versus Transobturator Tape in Surgical Management of Women With Stress Urinary Incontinence

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06334848
Enrollment
42
Registered
2024-03-28
Start date
2024-04-30
Completion date
2025-09-30
Last updated
2024-03-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Stress Urinary Incontinence

Brief summary

To compare the efficacy of mini sling against Transobturator tape for surgical management of women with stress urinary incontinence.

Detailed description

Urinary incontinence is defined as involuntary loss of urine and is divided into subtypes according to symptoms. These subtypes include SUI, in which urine loss occurs during exertion, physical exercise, coughing or sneezing; urgency urinary incontinence (UUI), in which urine loss is associated with urinary urgency; and mixed urinary incontinence (MUI), which is characterized by the association of stress loss with urgency. There are non-surgical treatments (e.g., lifestyle modifications, pharmacotherapy, physiotherapy and vaginal pessary) and surgical treatments. As regards sling use, it was found that mid urethral slings techniques achieved high cure rates in women with SUI and have become the mainstay for surgical treatment of SUI in women over the last 2 decades. One of the modalities of such procedures is the transobturator mid urethral tape (TOT). It was introduced to minimize the complications of the previous retropubic tapes, which include injury to the bladder, major vessels, and bowel. In an effort to maintain efficacy while eliminating some of the side effects, a new generation of tapes has been developed, called single incision tapes or mini-slings. They are designed to be shorter in length than standard mid-urethral slings and do not penetrate the tissues as deeply as standard slings.

Interventions

Women with stress urinary incontinence are treated by transobturator tape versus mini sling

Sponsors

Ain Shams University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
No minimum to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Women with a medical history of SUI * mixed urinary incontinence (MUI) in which SUI had to be the dominating symptom * confirmed by a positive standardized cough test with 300 cm3 water in the bladder

Exclusion criteria

* Women will be excluded if they are aged \>60 years * had previous incontinence or pelvic organ prolapse surgery * planned or present pregnancy * residual urine volume\>100 ml * previous pelvic irradiation * neurological conditions such as multiple sclerosis * current treatment with corticoids * history of genital or abdominal cancer or a pelvic mass.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Comparing Mini Sling and Transobturator Tape in Surgical Management of Women with Stress Urinary Incontinence regarding incidence of complicationsone yearcomparing between mini sling and transobturator tape in surgical management of women with stress urinary incontinence regarding: • Urinary continence measured by ICIQ(international continence index questionnaire)
Comparing Mini Sling and Transobturator Tape in Surgical Management of Women with Stress Urinary Incontinence regarding postoperative painone yearcomparing between mini sling and transobturator tape in surgical management of women with stress urinary incontinence regarding: • Post operative pain measured by NRS(numerical rating pain score)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Comparing Mini Sling and Transobturator Tape in Surgical Management of Women with Stress Urinary Incontinence regarding sexual functionone yearcomparing between mini sling and transobturator tape in surgical management of women with stress urinary incontinence regarding: • Sexual function measured by FSFI(female sexual function index)

Contacts

Primary ContactTarek Salem
tareksalemrezk@gmail.com00201002519888
Backup ContactAhmed Emam
emam606@hotmail.com00201228770965

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026