Accuracy of Guided Ridge Splitting With Simultaneous Implant Placement

Accuracy of Novel Ridge Splitting Guide Design in Comparison to Freehand With Simultaneous Implant Placement

Status

Completed

Phases

Study type

Interventional

Source

ClinicalTrials.gov

Registry ID

NCT06333912

Enrollment

Registered

2024-03-27

Start date

2023-08-02

Completion date

2024-02-27

Last updated

2024-03-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dental Implant

Keywords

guided ridge splitting, atrophic maxilla, osseodensification drills.

Brief summary

Assessing whether is there a difference between computer-guided ridge splitting and conventional technique with simultaneous implant placement in patients with maxillary width deficiency.

Detailed description

Two groups one treated with ridge splitting using guided surgery and the other one treated with freehand surgery and both groups had simultaneous dental implants the first one had guided placement and the other one was freehand.

Interventions

PROCEDUREdental implant placement with ridge splitting.

ridge splitting to increase bone width in atrophic maxilla with simultaneous implant placement

Study design

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Intervention model

PARALLEL

Primary purpose

TREATMENT

Masking

TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

ALL

Age

20 Years to 60 Years

Healthy volunteers

Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Patient with missing maxillary anteriors or premolars teeth. * Tooth extraction at the implant sites was performed at least 4 months before the surgery. * The bone width of the crestal one -third (3-5 mm) with sufficient bone height allowing for simultaneous implant placement. * Free from any systemic disease or local pathological lesions that may affect bone healing or contraindicate implant placement. * With no history of any previous grafting surgeries at the area of interest.

Exclusion criteria

* Sever concavity of the alveolar ridge. * Bad oral hygiene ( Silness-Löe index (score 2-3). * Heavy smoker (smoke greater than or equal 25 cigarettes per day). * Presence of acute infections or periapical lesions in adjacent teeth. * Parafunctional habits. * Pregnant females.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame	Description
Assessing the accuracy of guided surgery	one week	superimposition of post-op cbct to the planned position to check the accuracy of implant positions.

Secondary

Measure	Time frame	Description
the bone-width increase between control and study group.	6 months	evaluation of two techniques of ridge splitting in increasing bone width.

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026